What's the best way to solve this without memorizing what each radical represents?
a) a, b, c
b) b, c, a
c) b, a, c
d) c, a ,b
e) c, b, a
That's Radical Dude
This topic has expert replies
If we simply do a square for all these three it can be seen that
c : 16 = 8 + 8
b : 8 + 2 (15)^1/2 .Here 2 (15)^1/2 will be less than 2(16)^1/2 which is equal to 8 hence this will be less than c.
a: 8 + 2 (12)^1/2.Here 2 (12)^1/2 will be less than 2(15)^1/2 hence this will be less than b.
hence the correct order will be : c,b,a.
c : 16 = 8 + 8
b : 8 + 2 (15)^1/2 .Here 2 (15)^1/2 will be less than 2(16)^1/2 which is equal to 8 hence this will be less than c.
a: 8 + 2 (12)^1/2.Here 2 (12)^1/2 will be less than 2(15)^1/2 hence this will be less than b.
hence the correct order will be : c,b,a.
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 1:55 pm
- Thanked: 5 times
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Rahul@gurome
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1179
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 9:07 pm
- Location: Milpitas, CA
- Thanked: 447 times
- Followed by:88 members
Solution
It is given that a = sqrt(2) + sqrt(6) and b = sqrt(3) + sqrt(5).
Consider sqrt(6) - sqrt(5) which is same as {sqrt(6) -sqrt(5)} * {sqrt(6) + sqrt(5)}/ {sqrt(6) + sqrt(5)}.
In the above step we are both multiplying and dividing by the same quantity {sqrt(6) + sqrt(5)}.
So sqrt(6) - sqrt(5) = (6-5)/ {sqrt(6) + sqrt(5)} = 1/{sqrt(6) + sqrt(5)}.
Similarly sqrt(3) - sqrt(2) = 1/{sqrt(3) + sqrt(2)}.
Obviously {sqrt(6) + sqrt(5)} > {sqrt(3) + sqrt(2)} since both 6 and 5 are greater than 3 and 2 and so the sum of the roots of 6 and 5 will also be greater than the sum of roots of 3 and 2.
So 1/ {sqrt(6) + sqrt(5)}< 1/{sqrt(3) + sqrt(2)}.
Or sqrt(6) - sqrt(5) < sqrt(3) - sqrt(2).
Or sqrt(2) + sqrt(6) < sqrt(5) + sqrt(3).
So a < b.
Now 4 = sqrt(4) + sqrt (4).
Next consider b = sqrt(3) + sqrt(5) and c = sqrt(4) + sqrt (4).
So sqrt(5) - sqrt(4) = {sqrt(5) - sqrt(4)}* {sqrt(5) + sqrt(4)}/ {sqrt(5) + sqrt(4)}
= (5 - 4)/ {sqrt(5)+sqrt(4)}=1/{sqrt(5)+sqrt(4)}.
Similarly sqrt(4) - sqrt(3) = 1/{sqrt(4) + sqrt(3)}
Now 5 > 4 and 4 > 3.
So sqrt(5) > sqrt(4) and sqrt(4) > sqrt(3).
Hence sqrt(5) + sqrt(4) > sqrt(4) + sqrt(3).
Or 1/ {sqrt(5) + sqrt(4)} < 1/ {sqrt(4) + sqrt(3)}.
Or {sqrt(5) - sqrt(4)} < {sqrt(4) - sqrt(3)}.
Or sqrt(5) + sqrt(3) < sqrt(4) + sqrt(4)
Or sqrt(5) + sqrt(3) < 4.
Or b < c.
So a < b < c.
The correct answer is (a).
It is given that a = sqrt(2) + sqrt(6) and b = sqrt(3) + sqrt(5).
Consider sqrt(6) - sqrt(5) which is same as {sqrt(6) -sqrt(5)} * {sqrt(6) + sqrt(5)}/ {sqrt(6) + sqrt(5)}.
In the above step we are both multiplying and dividing by the same quantity {sqrt(6) + sqrt(5)}.
So sqrt(6) - sqrt(5) = (6-5)/ {sqrt(6) + sqrt(5)} = 1/{sqrt(6) + sqrt(5)}.
Similarly sqrt(3) - sqrt(2) = 1/{sqrt(3) + sqrt(2)}.
Obviously {sqrt(6) + sqrt(5)} > {sqrt(3) + sqrt(2)} since both 6 and 5 are greater than 3 and 2 and so the sum of the roots of 6 and 5 will also be greater than the sum of roots of 3 and 2.
So 1/ {sqrt(6) + sqrt(5)}< 1/{sqrt(3) + sqrt(2)}.
Or sqrt(6) - sqrt(5) < sqrt(3) - sqrt(2).
Or sqrt(2) + sqrt(6) < sqrt(5) + sqrt(3).
So a < b.
Now 4 = sqrt(4) + sqrt (4).
Next consider b = sqrt(3) + sqrt(5) and c = sqrt(4) + sqrt (4).
So sqrt(5) - sqrt(4) = {sqrt(5) - sqrt(4)}* {sqrt(5) + sqrt(4)}/ {sqrt(5) + sqrt(4)}
= (5 - 4)/ {sqrt(5)+sqrt(4)}=1/{sqrt(5)+sqrt(4)}.
Similarly sqrt(4) - sqrt(3) = 1/{sqrt(4) + sqrt(3)}
Now 5 > 4 and 4 > 3.
So sqrt(5) > sqrt(4) and sqrt(4) > sqrt(3).
Hence sqrt(5) + sqrt(4) > sqrt(4) + sqrt(3).
Or 1/ {sqrt(5) + sqrt(4)} < 1/ {sqrt(4) + sqrt(3)}.
Or {sqrt(5) - sqrt(4)} < {sqrt(4) - sqrt(3)}.
Or sqrt(5) + sqrt(3) < sqrt(4) + sqrt(4)
Or sqrt(5) + sqrt(3) < 4.
Or b < c.
So a < b < c.
The correct answer is (a).
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
- Thanked: 173 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:710
Nice Approach!!rn4gmat wrote:If we simply do a square for all these three it can be seen that
c : 16 = 8 + 8
b : 8 + 2 (15)^1/2 .Here 2 (15)^1/2 will be less than 2(16)^1/2 which is equal to 8 hence this will be less than c.
a: 8 + 2 (12)^1/2.Here 2 (12)^1/2 will be less than 2(15)^1/2 hence this will be less than b.
hence the correct order will be : c,b,a.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 12:33 am
- Thanked: 47 times
- Followed by:2 members
c² = 8 + 2√16rn4gmat wrote:If we simply do a square for all these three it can be seen that
c : 16 = 8 + 8
b : 8 + 2 (15)^1/2 .Here 2 (15)^1/2 will be less than 2(16)^1/2 which is equal to 8 hence this will be less than c.
a: 8 + 2 (12)^1/2.Here 2 (12)^1/2 will be less than 2(15)^1/2 hence this will be less than b.
hence the correct order will be : c,b,a.
b² = 8 + 2√15 8 = 3+5
a² = 8 + 2√12 8 = 2+6
that will make it clearer
so ascending order
a, b & c as they are +ve nos.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:46 pm
- Thanked: 8 times
- GMAT Score:690
Thanks, KSTV. Would it be possible for you to clarify that portion just a little more? I kind of follow it, but also a little lost.c² = 8 + 2√16
b² = 8 + 2√15 8 = 3+5
a² = 8 + 2√12 8 = 2+6