Philadelphia

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:44 am
Thanked: 9 times

Philadelphia

by avenus » Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:12 am
..
Attachments
Philadelphia.JPG

Legendary Member
Posts: 941
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:28 am
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:1 members

by bhumika.k.shah » Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:30 am
avenus wrote:..
A- in advertising...in the labeling - lack of parallelism . ELIMINATE

B- in advertising ...in the labels of ... lack of parallelism . ELIMINATE

C- in advertising...in labeling of ... lack of parallelism . ELIMINATE . i think it is purposely mentioned to confuse us .

D- in advertising ...in labeling...parallelism maintained. CORRECT

E-in advertising...labeling... lack of parallelism + prepositional error missing.ELIMINATE

Hope this helps :)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 199
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:15 am
Location: India
Thanked: 13 times

by gauravgundal » Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:57 am
IMO c.
Let me know if it is correct.
If it is correct I can explain it.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2109
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:25 pm
Location: New Jersey
Thanked: 109 times
Followed by:79 members
GMAT Score:640

by money9111 » Sun Feb 14, 2010 8:56 pm
IMO C as well... truth in vs. labeling of
My goal is to make MBA applicants take onus over their process.

My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog

Me featured on Poets & Quants

Free Book for MBA Applicants