Theory Of Grammar

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 am
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times
Followed by:47 members

Theory Of Grammar

by komal » Wed Feb 10, 2010 8:39 pm
Any theory of grammar should answer three basic questions: what constitutes knowledge of grammar, how it is acquired, and how it is put to use.

(A) how it is acquired, and how it is put to use

(B) how is knowledge of grammar acquired, and how put to use

(C) how it was acquired and put to use

(D) its acquisition and putting to use

(E) how its knowledge is acquired, and how it is put to use


OA A

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1560
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:38 am
Thanked: 137 times
Followed by:5 members

by thephoenix » Wed Feb 10, 2010 8:55 pm
komal wrote: Any theory of grammar should answer three basic questions: what constitutes knowledge of grammar, how it is acquired, and how it is put to use.

(A) how it is acquired, and how it is put to use
correct
(B) how is knowledge of grammar acquired, and how put to use
...no sub in red color part


(C) how it was acquired and put to use
lacks llelism

(D) its acquisition and putting to use
lacks llelism

(E) how its knowledge is acquired, and how it is put to use

its knowledge changes meaning


OA A

Legendary Member
Posts: 941
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:28 am
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:1 members

by bhumika.k.shah » Wed Feb 10, 2010 9:42 pm
Simple parallelism is required here .

What constitutes and how it is .

B ,C and E are wrong because its talking about past tense whereas the sentence is talking about present tense. constitutes..

E lacks parallelism within the underlined sentence itself.

D uses noun form - acquisition which isnt required in our case . Again lacks parallelism within the underlined part.

Hence A

The only one that maintains parallelism.

Hope this helps :)
komal wrote:Any theory of grammar should answer three basic questions: what constitutes knowledge of grammar, how it is acquired, and how it is put to use.

(A) how it is acquired, and how it is put to use

(B) how is knowledge of grammar acquired, and how put to use

(C) how it was acquired and put to use

(D) its acquisition and putting to use

(E) how its knowledge is acquired, and how it is put to use


OA A

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2109
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:25 pm
Location: New Jersey
Thanked: 109 times
Followed by:79 members
GMAT Score:640

by money9111 » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:01 pm
which word is "it" referring to in the correct answer? I guess a better question would be... how do you tell besides just knowing?
My goal is to make MBA applicants take onus over their process.

My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog

Me featured on Poets & Quants

Free Book for MBA Applicants


Legendary Member
Posts: 941
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:28 am
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:1 members

by bhumika.k.shah » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:02 pm
I am sowree. i dint quite get ur question . if u could be a l'l more specific i'd probably be able to help you out .
money9111 wrote:which word is "it" referring to in the correct answer? I guess a better question would be... how do you tell besides just knowing?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2109
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:25 pm
Location: New Jersey
Thanked: 109 times
Followed by:79 members
GMAT Score:640

by money9111 » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:07 pm
sorry... in the correct answer we have:

how it is acquired, and how it is put to use.

how do we know what "IT" is referring too? what part of speech should I be looking for to determine whether or not IT is being properly used?
My goal is to make MBA applicants take onus over their process.

My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog

Me featured on Poets & Quants

Free Book for MBA Applicants


User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1560
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:38 am
Thanked: 137 times
Followed by:5 members

by thephoenix » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:07 pm
money9111 wrote:which word is "it" referring to in the correct answer? I guess a better question would be... how do you tell besides just knowing?
knowledge of grammer is noun phrase ahving head noun as knowledge and it reffers to knowledge
rem sub of prepositional pharse is never the main sub

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 221
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:24 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by mgmt_gmat » Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:30 am
IMO (A)..

parallelism...

what constitutes..

How it is...

How it is....