A question from GMATPrep.
A certain jar contains only b black marbles, w white marbles, and r red marbles. If one marble is to be chosen at random from the jar, is the probability that the marble chosen will be red greater than the probability that the marble chosen will be white ?
1) r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)
2) b-w >r
I'll post the answer after a few repplies.
Hope one of you can help me out here.
Thnx,
-B
GMATPrep - Marbles
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:42 am
- Thanked: 27 times
Answer should be A
Q asks "is the probability that the marble chosen will be red greater than the probability that the marble chosen will be white ? "
this is possible only if r>w
stm1 :
r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)
i.e. r(b + r) > w (b + w)
now since b is same(constant) in both expressions so r>w to make the expression true
hence SUFF
stmt 2: b-w >r
this would be possible for both the cases r>w & w>r
i.e b =20 ,w =14 ,r =5
& b=10, w =2 & r = 6
so Insuff
Q asks "is the probability that the marble chosen will be red greater than the probability that the marble chosen will be white ? "
this is possible only if r>w
stm1 :
r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)
i.e. r(b + r) > w (b + w)
now since b is same(constant) in both expressions so r>w to make the expression true
hence SUFF
stmt 2: b-w >r
this would be possible for both the cases r>w & w>r
i.e b =20 ,w =14 ,r =5
& b=10, w =2 & r = 6
so Insuff
Regards
Samir
Samir
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 9:50 pm
- Location: Chicago
- Thanked: 1 times
I did this way:
the prob of taking red ball out = r/b+w+r
for white ball = w/b+w+r
the question is whether r/b+w+r > w/b+w+r
or we have to find whether r > w
According to 1
r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)
Add 1 to both sides
this makes r+b+w/b+w>r+b+w/b+r
this givesb+r > b+w which means r > w SUFF
2.b - w > r
here we don't know if w>r or w<r
hence A
the prob of taking red ball out = r/b+w+r
for white ball = w/b+w+r
the question is whether r/b+w+r > w/b+w+r
or we have to find whether r > w
According to 1
r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)
Add 1 to both sides
this makes r+b+w/b+w>r+b+w/b+r
this givesb+r > b+w which means r > w SUFF
2.b - w > r
here we don't know if w>r or w<r
hence A
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 6:22 am
one more shot,
we need to prove
r/(r+b+w) > b/(r+b+w)
cross multiplying
= r^2 + br+wr > wr+bw+w^2
= r^2+br > bw+ w^2
= r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)
which is the given first condition
hence A is suff.
b is not suff because, b>r+w is given, but it doesnt say anything about r and w.
we need to prove
r/(r+b+w) > b/(r+b+w)
cross multiplying
= r^2 + br+wr > wr+bw+w^2
= r^2+br > bw+ w^2
= r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)
which is the given first condition
hence A is suff.
b is not suff because, b>r+w is given, but it doesnt say anything about r and w.