Target Test Prep 20% Off Flash Sale is on! Code: FLASH20

Redeem
Target Test Prep
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

MORE DETAILS
Target Test Prep
Magoosh
Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

MORE DETAILS
Magoosh

Antecedent & Pronoun rule

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 882
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:690

Antecedent & Pronoun rule

by crackgmat007 » Sun Oct 11, 2009 11:37 am
I want to clarify whether a noun must be functioning as a subject or object of the verb in order to be qualified as an antecedent.

Thoughts?
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:07 am
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:690

by vaibhav.iit2002 » Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:37 pm
Great question.

This ques. has been troubling me as well.
I have seen 1-2 examples where both subject and object noun works as antecedent but i am not sure and need more inputs
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 882
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:690

by crackgmat007 » Mon Oct 12, 2009 9:07 pm
vaibhav.iit2002 wrote:Great question.

This ques. has been troubling me as well.
I have seen 1-2 examples where both subject and object noun works as antecedent but i am not sure and need more inputs
Actually antecedent can be a noun that is functioning as a subj or obj of the verb. I want to know whether object of a preposition can qualify as an antecedent. Or any noun that is not functioning as an subj or obj of verb can function as antecedent?
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 882
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:690

by crackgmat007 » Sun Oct 18, 2009 7:52 pm
Anyone! :?
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1