Confused about use of which. Please explain
I read the following material from Wren & Martin.
Some times which is used as a relative pronoun to refer to the noun immediately preceding it.
ex: I gave him a dollar, which was all I had with me.
Some times which is used to refer to a previous sentence/a preceding clause.
ex: The man was said to be drunk, which was not the case.
and now I read the following example in MGMAT SC
The police found the murder weapon, which made the procesutors job easier.
MGMAT says 'which' is used to refer to a noun immediately preceding it. So in this sentence, 'which' refers to a weapon, while the intention is finding the weapon has made the prosecutor's job easier.
My question is why can't 'which' indicate that the 'finding of the weapon' has made the prosecutors job easy?
How can we catch the difference in usage of 'which' in GMAT? can someone explain with more examples?
Thanks in advance!!
Use of Which - nuances
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pm
- Thanked: 104 times
- Followed by:1 members
"which" must only refer to an immediately preceding noun. it cannot refer to a preceding clause.
the 2nd example would be a wrong usge of "which" per gmat.
the 2nd example would be a wrong usge of "which" per gmat.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Stacey Koprince
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2228
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
- Location: Montreal, Canada
- Thanked: 639 times
- Followed by:694 members
- GMAT Score:780
The key here is that you have to make sure you're studying what the GMAT tests - that's not necessarily the same as what another grammar source says is acceptable. Wren & Martin is a very reputable source. But the GMAT tends to cling to the old formal rules much longer, while more modern sources will adapt more quickly to recent changes.
Because the GMAT people are writing the test, we have to go by what they say, not by what modern usage may allow in everyday speech or writing.
I think Wren & Martin (or something similar) can be a good secondary resource if you want some additional information about something you read, but use GMAT-based works (such as OG or our SC guide) as your primary source and, if there are contradictions, go with what the GMAT-based source says.
Because the GMAT people are writing the test, we have to go by what they say, not by what modern usage may allow in everyday speech or writing.
I think Wren & Martin (or something similar) can be a good secondary resource if you want some additional information about something you read, but use GMAT-based works (such as OG or our SC guide) as your primary source and, if there are contradictions, go with what the GMAT-based source says.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!
Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT
Contributor to Beat The GMAT!
Learn more about me
Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT
Contributor to Beat The GMAT!
Learn more about me
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 9:10 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
- Followed by:1 members