Like Austen, the characters of Forster are concerned largely with achieving economic security in a world riddled with class distinctions.
A. Like Austen, the characters of Forster
B.Like Austen, Forster's characters
C. Like Austen's, Forster's characters
D. As with Austen, Forster's characters
E. As are Austen's Forster's characters
Like
This topic has expert replies
- hariharakarthi
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:54 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
- GMAT Score:550
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:55 am
- Thanked: 17 times
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:2 members
One more for C...madhur_ahuja wrote:Its C
For comparsion of nouns....the preferred ones are Like/unlike....
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1161
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
- Location: Sydney
- Thanked: 23 times
- Followed by:1 members
Can I ask what's wrong with A?
goelmohit2002 wrote:One more for C...madhur_ahuja wrote:Its C
For comparsion of nouns....the preferred ones are Like/unlike....
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:2 members
IMO..mehravikas wrote:Can I ask what's wrong with A?
A says "Like Austen, the characters of Forster".....here Austen is wrongly....compared to characters
Comparison should be between comparable things..
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1161
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
- Location: Sydney
- Thanked: 23 times
- Followed by:1 members
IMO - like can also have a meaning "similar to"...
goelmohit2002 wrote:IMO..mehravikas wrote:Can I ask what's wrong with A?
A says "Like Austen, the characters of Forster".....here Austen is wrongly....compared to characters
Comparison should be between comparable things..
So what? again 'similar to' also is used for comparison only....mehravikas wrote:IMO - like can also have a meaning "similar to"...
goelmohit2002 wrote:IMO..mehravikas wrote:Can I ask what's wrong with A?
A says "Like Austen, the characters of Forster".....here Austen is wrongly....compared to characters
Comparison should be between comparable things..
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:2 members
Just to add what real2008 said already....mehravikas wrote:IMO - like can also have a meaning "similar to"...
Manhattan SC giuide say:
like = similar to [but not including]
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 2:47 am
- Thanked: 12 times
Chariharakarthi wrote:Like Austen, the characters of Forster are concerned largely with achieving economic security in a world riddled with class distinctions.
A. Like Austen, the characters of Forster
B.Like Austen, Forster's characters
C. Like Austen's, Forster's characters
D. As with Austen, Forster's characters
E. As are Austen's Forster's characters
apples to apples comparison in part of speech
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:05 pm
- Location: Ohio, US
- Thanked: 6 times
Another Vote for C,
comparison of nouns will take Like and not As
comparison of nouns will take Like and not As
Its better to burn out than to fade away
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:24 am
My vote goes for C too.
If we add a coma after "Austen's", would E be acceptable?
"As are Austen's, Forster's characters are concerned largely with achieving economic security in a world riddled with class distinctions."
Is it the correct use of "As"?
Isn' t it a bit "wordy"?
Thanks for the help.
If we add a coma after "Austen's", would E be acceptable?
"As are Austen's, Forster's characters are concerned largely with achieving economic security in a world riddled with class distinctions."
Is it the correct use of "As"?
Isn' t it a bit "wordy"?
Thanks for the help.