A recent survey found that more computers than copies of computer programs were purchased by Germans last year. The best interpretation of this finding is that the practice of illegally duplicating commercial computer programs is widespread among Germans.
Each of the following, if true, would counter some reasonable objection to the interpretation advanced above EXCEPT:
(A) Few German computer users write their own computer programs.
(B) There are few free noncommercial computer programs available in Germany.
(C) Some Germans purchase computers outside of Germany for use in Germany, and such purchases were counted in the survey.
(D) The typical German computer user has several commercially written computer programs on his or her computer.
(E) Many Germans legally make duplicates of commercial computer programs, but such duplicates were counted as purchased copies in the survey.
For discussion, OA to follow. Pls explain your answers
Germans
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
- Thanked: 15 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:690
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:55 am
- Thanked: 17 times
IMO A
(A) Few German computer users write their own computer programs.
This cannot be an objection. Instead it strengthens.
(B) There are few free noncommercial computer programs available in Germany. This can be an objection, since users might be using free soft.
(C) Some Germans purchase computers outside of Germany for use in Germany, and such purchases were counted in the survey. This can be an objection since they might be buying programs outside germany
(D) The typical German computer user has several commercially written computer programs on his or her computer. This can be an objection since they might already have programs.
(E) Many Germans legally make duplicates of commercial computer programs, but such duplicates were counted as purchased copies in the survey.... This can be an ojbection clear.y
For discussion, OA to follow. Pls explain your answers[/quote]
(A) Few German computer users write their own computer programs.
This cannot be an objection. Instead it strengthens.
(B) There are few free noncommercial computer programs available in Germany. This can be an objection, since users might be using free soft.
(C) Some Germans purchase computers outside of Germany for use in Germany, and such purchases were counted in the survey. This can be an objection since they might be buying programs outside germany
(D) The typical German computer user has several commercially written computer programs on his or her computer. This can be an objection since they might already have programs.
(E) Many Germans legally make duplicates of commercial computer programs, but such duplicates were counted as purchased copies in the survey.... This can be an ojbection clear.y
For discussion, OA to follow. Pls explain your answers[/quote]
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 8:01 am
- Thanked: 4 times
I will go for A too....
The Answer would be the option that - does not counter some reasonable objection to the interpretation advanced.
Reasonable Objection to the interpretation would prove that - germans do not practice illegal duplication
Counter the reasonable objection to the interpretation would prove that - germans do practice illegal duplication
Answer would be that - Does not counter the objection to the interpreation would prove that - germans do not practice illegal duplication
1) Few German computer users write their own computer programs - Correct Answer .... Do not practice illegal duplication
2) There are few free non commercial computer programs available in Germany - Non Commercial computer programs are not being discussed here...
3) Some Germans purchase computers outside of germany , and such purchases were counted in the survey - This might prove that germans practice illegal duplication , since the purchase of computers outisde of germany has been counted.
4) The typical German computer user has several commercially written computer programs on his or her computer - This might prove that germans practice illegal duplication , since they are having several programs and even though they are buying less copies of computer programs...
5) Many Germans legally make duplicates of commercial computer programs, but such duplicates were counted as purchased copies in the survey - This might prove that germans practice illegal duplication , coz legally made duplicates have been counted and still No. of computers purchased > No. of computer programs.
The Answer would be the option that - does not counter some reasonable objection to the interpretation advanced.
Reasonable Objection to the interpretation would prove that - germans do not practice illegal duplication
Counter the reasonable objection to the interpretation would prove that - germans do practice illegal duplication
Answer would be that - Does not counter the objection to the interpreation would prove that - germans do not practice illegal duplication
1) Few German computer users write their own computer programs - Correct Answer .... Do not practice illegal duplication
2) There are few free non commercial computer programs available in Germany - Non Commercial computer programs are not being discussed here...
3) Some Germans purchase computers outside of germany , and such purchases were counted in the survey - This might prove that germans practice illegal duplication , since the purchase of computers outisde of germany has been counted.
4) The typical German computer user has several commercially written computer programs on his or her computer - This might prove that germans practice illegal duplication , since they are having several programs and even though they are buying less copies of computer programs...
5) Many Germans legally make duplicates of commercial computer programs, but such duplicates were counted as purchased copies in the survey - This might prove that germans practice illegal duplication , coz legally made duplicates have been counted and still No. of computers purchased > No. of computer programs.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 527
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:14 am
- Location: Atlanta
- Thanked: 17 times
For me between C and D, but i chose D. i think D strengthens the conclusion
i think A weakens the conclusion. Germans write their own programs and does not illegally copy programs - (against the conclusion)
For C - > even though the computers were bought outside Germany, but being used in Germany, the owners should have bought the programs to be used.
i think A weakens the conclusion. Germans write their own programs and does not illegally copy programs - (against the conclusion)
For C - > even though the computers were bought outside Germany, but being used in Germany, the owners should have bought the programs to be used.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
- Thanked: 15 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:690
Update -> OA - Cpandeyvineet24 wrote:For me between C and D, but i chose D. i think D strengthens the conclusion
i think A weakens the conclusion. Germans write their own programs and does not illegally copy programs - (against the conclusion)
For C - > even though the computers were bought outside Germany, but being used in Germany, the owners should have bought the programs to be used.
Last edited by crackgmat007 on Sat Jul 25, 2009 7:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:02 pm
- Thanked: 15 times
what about E? Isnt the question asking which one does not weaken the argument, i.e. which one does not indicate that illegal copies are being made (either through strengthening the original claim or a neutral statement that neither strengthens nor weakens)...crackgmat007 wrote:A recent survey found that more computers than copies of computer programs were purchased by Germans last year. The best interpretation of this finding is that the practice of illegally duplicating commercial computer programs is widespread among Germans.
Each of the following, if true, would counter some reasonable objection to the interpretation advanced above EXCEPT:
(A) Few German computer users write their own computer programs. --> that could be why software sale< computer sales
(B) There are few free noncommercial computer programs available in Germany. --> that could be why software sale< computer sales
(C) Some Germans purchase computers outside of Germany for use in Germany, and such purchases were counted in the survey. --> number of computers overcounted.
(D) The typical German computer user has several commercially written computer programs on his or her computer.--> hence no need to purchase software
(E) Many Germans legally make duplicates of commercial computer programs, but such duplicates were counted as purchased copies in the survey. --> this means that software counted were more than actually purchased hence strengthens the claim that software sales < computer sales.
For discussion, OA to follow. Pls explain your answers
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:02 pm
- Thanked: 15 times
I think I confused myself there! what I meant to say was that I think the question is asking which statement does not weaken the the conclusion that illegal copies are being made. I still think its E though.life is a test wrote:what about E? Isnt the question asking which one does not weaken the argument, i.e. which one does not indicate that illegal copies are being made (either through strengthening the original claim or a neutral statement that neither strengthens nor weakens)...crackgmat007 wrote:A recent survey found that more computers than copies of computer programs were purchased by Germans last year. The best interpretation of this finding is that the practice of illegally duplicating commercial computer programs is widespread among Germans.
Each of the following, if true, would counter some reasonable objection to the interpretation advanced above EXCEPT:
(A) Few German computer users write their own computer programs. --> that could be why software sale< computer sales
(B) There are few free noncommercial computer programs available in Germany. --> that could be why software sale< computer sales
(C) Some Germans purchase computers outside of Germany for use in Germany, and such purchases were counted in the survey. --> number of computers overcounted.
(D) The typical German computer user has several commercially written computer programs on his or her computer.--> hence no need to purchase software
(E) Many Germans legally make duplicates of commercial computer programs, but such duplicates were counted as purchased copies in the survey. --> this means that software counted were more than actually purchased hence strengthens the claim that software sales < computer sales.
For discussion, OA to follow. Pls explain your answers
- gmat740
- MBA Student
- Posts: 1194
- Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:42 pm
- Location: Paris, France
- Thanked: 71 times
- Followed by:17 members
- GMAT Score:710
Guys take a look :
Conclusion : the practice of illegally duplicating commercial computer programs is widespread among Germans
Why : Because more computers than copies of computer programs were purchased by Germans
Now keep in mind the conclusion. We have to find an answer which does not weaken
Hope this Long Post Clarifies all your Doubts
Conclusion : the practice of illegally duplicating commercial computer programs is widespread among Germans
Why : Because more computers than copies of computer programs were purchased by Germans
Now keep in mind the conclusion. We have to find an answer which does not weaken
The answer has to be C(A) Few German computer users write their own computer programs. that means Germans don't need to buy programs.So this weakens the argument. Hence not an answer
(B) There are few free noncommercial computer programs available in Germany. When free programs are available, will you care to buy?? Certainly no! so this also weakens.Kick this one out
(C) Some Germans purchase computers outside of Germany for use in Germany, and such purchases were counted in the survey. The conclusion is about the computer program and this statement NEVER talks about any such program.Clearly, this has hardly any effect on the argument
(D) The typical German computer user has several commercially written computer programs on his or her computer. When Germans already have programs in their computer,why will they buy.So this weakens to and not the answer.You can personalize this one as, if you are getting Mobile Phone + Accessories, will you still buy accessories?NO
(E) Many Germans legally make duplicates of commercial computer programs, but such duplicates were counted as purchased copies in the survey.When Germans legally duplicate(may be by paying some amount)so they are definitely not making ILLEGAL COPIES which the argument claims.So this also weakens.
Hope this Long Post Clarifies all your Doubts
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
- Thanked: 15 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:690
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 527
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:14 am
- Location: Atlanta
- Thanked: 17 times
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
- Thanked: 15 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:690
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:07 am