Vargonia

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 572
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:25 am
Thanked: 21 times

Vargonia

by reachac » Wed Jul 16, 2008 11:09 pm
In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic recession because many businesses cut back operations. However, any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools. This is because Vargonia has just introduced a legal requirement that education in government-funded schools be available, free of charge, to all Vargonian children regardless of the state of the economy, and that current student-teacher ratios not be exceeded.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A. The current student-teacher ratio at Vargonia’s government-funded schools is higher than it was during the most recent period of economic recession.
B. During recent periods when the Vargonian economy has been strong, almost 25 percent of Vargonian children have attended privately funded schools, many of which charge substantial fees.
C. Nearly 20 percent more teachers are currently employed in Vargonia’s government-funded schools than had been employed in those schools in the period before the last economic recession.
D. Teachers in Vargonia’s government-funded schools are well paid relative to teachers in most privately funded schools in Vargonia, many of which rely heavily on part-time teachers.
E. During the last economic recession in Vargonia, the government permanently closed a number of the schools that it had funded.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1159
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:35 pm
Thanked: 56 times

by raunekk » Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:09 am
IMO:B

student:teacher ratio should remain the same...

if just 25% attend private schools wen economy is strong.. ten during recession..this students will join government funded schools..

as more students join government schools and the student to teacher ratio should remain the same..more teachers will be hired.. to maintain the ratio...thus even during recession more teachers will be employed...this will strengthen the conclusion..

i guess i went too deep... :?

but will stick to it.. :wink:

thx

please let me know the source..

Amazing question....:)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:33 pm
Thanked: 5 times

by Vignesh.4384 » Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:13 am
Hi Renaukk
if just 25% attend private schools wen economy is strong.. ten during recession..this students will join government funded schools..
How can u say that during recession the students will join governtment funded schools..? Option B does not assure that nor does that passage..

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:23 am
Thanked: 1 times

by bigfernhead » Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:09 am
IMO C.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1159
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:35 pm
Thanked: 56 times

by raunekk » Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:33 am
hi Vignesh.4384..

U misspelled it.. its raunekk :wink:

well.. i applied POE over here.. and was left with C and B

But C doesnt make sense because it says 'before the last recession"...
So was left with B...If you read it closely.. it does make sense..

Argument talks about the current situation and the steps gov. will take for future recession.. which could lead to 'many businesses cut back operations"...like reduction in number of teachers in private school or close down..

Also,this is the only option i felt, that deals with the "ratio" part...

reachac...OA and source pls??? :wink:

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:38 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by lvincy » Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:31 pm
IMO : D.

The availability of jobs will be constant if Vargonia employs fulltime teacher.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1159
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:35 pm
Thanked: 56 times

by raunekk » Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:55 pm
lvincy..

The argument doesnt say anything about payment to teachers...

Also, u said..

"The availability of jobs will be constant if Vargonia employs fulltime teacher."

it means..??? :?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:38 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by lvincy » Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:16 pm
The teaching jobs will not decrease during recession as the jobs are fulltime.
chances are it might increase more students join public school to maintain ratio.

lvincy

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:33 pm
Thanked: 5 times

by Vignesh.4384 » Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:31 pm
Hi raunekk,

i got it right this time :wink:
But C doesnt make sense because it says 'before the last recession"...
So was left with B...If you read it closely.. it does make sense..

Argument talks about the current situation and the steps gov. will take for future recession.. which could lead to 'many businesses cut back operations"...like reduction in number of teachers in private school or close down..
option B says 25% of them attened private schools which has more tutuion fees.
1)This could mean that those who attend private school are form wealthy families and wil continue to do so even during recession period.
2)The passage does not say any thing about private schools being shut down.
3)even if there economic recession is huge, there is no substantical evidence to show that private school teachers will be in the lione of fire..

Consider option D: It says the teachers of govt school are paid well..This would mean there will not be a decrease in the no of teachers in the govt school. So he student teacher ratio wil stil be maintained ..

Wonder where this question came from ?
it seems to be very vague.

IMO D

Regards,
Vignesh

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:31 am
Location: India
Thanked: 2 times

by Aldiablo » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:20 am
Conclusion is:
any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools.

So we are not bothered about the salaries, (discard D.)

And,

nor are we bothered about the percentage of students that attended the private schools when Virginia was not in economic recession. (May be there were even less than 25 percent previously). (discard B.)


IMO C.
When you think you can or you cannot, you are generally correct.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 401
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 9:21 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by NSNguyen » Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:23 am
I will go with E
if this goverment funded school is the only in the region,
have no teacher increase when recession happens
:LOL:
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:14 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by ska7945 » Wed May 27, 2009 1:28 am
b and only b
let's beat GMAT.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 12:22 am

by aman.kr.jha » Wed May 27, 2009 2:16 am
options C seems correct.

"any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools"
this statement is predicting the future senario based on legal requirement which has been just introduced by the goverment.

Option C state - "Nearly 20 percent more teachers are currently employed in Vargonia’s government-funded schools than had been employed in those schools in the period before the last economic recession"
it means .. government has started working on the lagal requirement.
So option c strengthen the argument that "any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools"

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 8:33 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by axat » Wed May 27, 2009 5:10 am
I will go with C too.

OA and source, please?

Why does one have to ask for these, why can't the initiators just have the good sense to include the same, and mask them if so desired.

Bah.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 5:54 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by DarkKnight » Thu May 28, 2009 5:13 pm
I would go with B.

Please post OA....