adjustments for inflation

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 am
Thanked: 9 times
Followed by:3 members

adjustments for inflation

by kaulnikhil » Sat Apr 10, 2010 12:46 am
With adjustments for inflation,the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973

(a)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than
(b)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement as
(c)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(d)and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(e)and the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less as a result to implement than

[spoiler]What is the issue with C here ?? plz dont say that it doesn't sound good, so easy to eliminate[/spoiler]

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 126
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:41 pm
Location: Chennai
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:660

by vivek1110 » Sat Apr 10, 2010 12:58 am
I would've gone with C too, what's the OA?
Is caught between a rock and a hard place!

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 11:37 pm

by krbharat » Sat Apr 10, 2010 1:12 am
kaulnikhil wrote:With adjustments for inflation,the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973

(a)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than
(b)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement as
(c)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(d)and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(e)and the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less as a result to implement than

[spoiler]What is the issue with C here ?? plz dont say that it doesn't sound good, so easy to eliminate[/spoiler]

IMO:D
what is the oa?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 am
Thanked: 9 times
Followed by:3 members

by kaulnikhil » Sat Apr 10, 2010 3:04 am
vivek1110 wrote:I would've gone with C too, what's the OA?
OA D ..

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 am
Thanked: 9 times
Followed by:3 members

by kaulnikhil » Sat Apr 10, 2010 3:04 am
krbharat wrote:
kaulnikhil wrote:With adjustments for inflation,the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973

(a)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than
(b)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement as
(c)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(d)and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(e)and the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less as a result to implement than

[spoiler]What is the issue with C here ?? plz dont say that it doesn't sound good, so easy to eliminate[/spoiler]

IMO:D
what is the oa?
Can you please explain the issues with C ?
\

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 3:51 am
Thanked: 8 times
GMAT Score:680

by Fiver » Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:39 am
kaulnikhil wrote:
krbharat wrote:
kaulnikhil wrote:With adjustments for inflation,the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973

(a)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than
(b)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement as
(c)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(d)and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(e)and the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less as a result to implement than

[spoiler]What is the issue with C here ?? plz dont say that it doesn't sound good, so easy to eliminate[/spoiler]

IMO:D
what is the oa?
Can you please explain the issues with C ?
\
Option C: resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did

In such comparison structures the verb in the latter part is usually ellided.
The problem here is that 'did' must stand for a verb, while 'costing' is not really a verb.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 am
Thanked: 9 times
Followed by:3 members

by kaulnikhil » Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:55 am
Fiver wrote:
kaulnikhil wrote:
krbharat wrote:
kaulnikhil wrote:With adjustments for inflation,the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973

(a)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than
(b)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement as
(c)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(d)and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(e)and the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less as a result to implement than

[spoiler]What is the issue with C here ?? plz dont say that it doesn't sound good, so easy to eliminate[/spoiler]

IMO:D
what is the oa?
Can you please explain the issues with C ?
\
Option C: resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did

In such comparison structures the verb in the latter part is usually ellided.
The problem here is that 'did' must stand for a verb, while 'costing' is not really a verb.
Missed it ..Thanks a Lot

Legendary Member
Posts: 809
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:10 pm
Thanked: 50 times
Followed by:4 members

by akhpad » Sat Apr 10, 2010 7:06 am
I have a question in D

(d)and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did

Correct idiom is "as a result of". Of is missing, even that is can correct.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 am
Thanked: 9 times
Followed by:3 members

by kaulnikhil » Sat Apr 10, 2010 7:16 am
akhp77 wrote:I have a question in D

(d)and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did

Correct idiom is "as a result of". Of is missing, even that is can correct.
Here you want to show the result of an particular activity hence as a result is fine
However if you want to show the reason for a particular result
as a result of should be used.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 758
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:32 pm
Location: Bangalore,India
Thanked: 67 times
Followed by:2 members

by sumanr84 » Sat Apr 10, 2010 9:35 am
kaulnikhil wrote:With adjustments for inflation,the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973

(a)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than
(b)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement as
(c)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(d)and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(e)and the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less as a result to implement than

[spoiler]What is the issue with C here ?? plz dont say that it doesn't sound good, so easy to eliminate[/spoiler]
Issue with C is 'now costing about'. If we make use of infinitive then it should be ok I guess.
(c)resulting in the welfare program now to cost about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did.

Any thoughts ?
I am on a break !!

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:45 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by shubhamkumar » Wed Mar 28, 2012 7:27 pm
kaulnikhil wrote:With adjustments for inflation,the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973

(a)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than
(b)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement as
(c)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(d)and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(e)and the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less as a result to implement than

[spoiler]What is the issue with C here ?? plz dont say that it doesn't sound good, so easy to eliminate[/spoiler]
:arrow: The official explanation says that the verb resulting cannot be used here because it does not have a real subject.Therefore "and as a result" is more correct.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 58
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 11:12 pm
Thanked: 7 times

by henryjejo » Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:43 am
Hi All,

I couldn't differentiate between C&D with any grammar rules. But based on the context, it appears that the drop in relative cost led to X. This requires a cause-and-effect kind of a sentence and D fits better for this scenario.

As for C, "Resulting" modifies the previous clause, which is not intended.

Please correct my understanding.

Thanks
HenryJEJO

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 279
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 10:56 pm
Thanked: 60 times
Followed by:10 members

by anuprajan5 » Thu Sep 20, 2012 1:27 am
What I could spot in C is the use of a comma. A comma is used when you separate independent clauses with a co-ordinating conjunction. The option in C is not an independent clause whereas D is an independent clause - As a result....

I agree with the idiomatic approach of - "as a result of", but none of the options have that usage.

Regards
Anup