With adjustments for inflation,the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973
(a)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than
(b)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement as
(c)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(d)and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(e)and the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less as a result to implement than
[spoiler]What is the issue with C here ?? plz dont say that it doesn't sound good, so easy to eliminate[/spoiler]
adjustments for inflation
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 am
- Thanked: 9 times
- Followed by:3 members
kaulnikhil wrote:With adjustments for inflation,the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973
(a)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than
(b)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement as
(c)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(d)and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(e)and the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less as a result to implement than
[spoiler]What is the issue with C here ?? plz dont say that it doesn't sound good, so easy to eliminate[/spoiler]
IMO:D
what is the oa?
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 am
- Thanked: 9 times
- Followed by:3 members
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 am
- Thanked: 9 times
- Followed by:3 members
Can you please explain the issues with C ?krbharat wrote:kaulnikhil wrote:With adjustments for inflation,the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973
(a)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than
(b)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement as
(c)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(d)and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(e)and the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less as a result to implement than
[spoiler]What is the issue with C here ?? plz dont say that it doesn't sound good, so easy to eliminate[/spoiler]
IMO:D
what is the oa?
\
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 3:51 am
- Thanked: 8 times
- GMAT Score:680
Option C: resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it didkaulnikhil wrote:Can you please explain the issues with C ?krbharat wrote:kaulnikhil wrote:With adjustments for inflation,the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973
(a)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than
(b)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement as
(c)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(d)and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(e)and the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less as a result to implement than
[spoiler]What is the issue with C here ?? plz dont say that it doesn't sound good, so easy to eliminate[/spoiler]
IMO:D
what is the oa?
\
In such comparison structures the verb in the latter part is usually ellided.
The problem here is that 'did' must stand for a verb, while 'costing' is not really a verb.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 am
- Thanked: 9 times
- Followed by:3 members
Missed it ..Thanks a LotFiver wrote:Option C: resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it didkaulnikhil wrote:Can you please explain the issues with C ?krbharat wrote:kaulnikhil wrote:With adjustments for inflation,the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973
(a)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than
(b)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement as
(c)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(d)and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(e)and the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less as a result to implement than
[spoiler]What is the issue with C here ?? plz dont say that it doesn't sound good, so easy to eliminate[/spoiler]
IMO:D
what is the oa?
\
In such comparison structures the verb in the latter part is usually ellided.
The problem here is that 'did' must stand for a verb, while 'costing' is not really a verb.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:10 pm
- Thanked: 50 times
- Followed by:4 members
I have a question in D
(d)and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
Correct idiom is "as a result of". Of is missing, even that is can correct.
(d)and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
Correct idiom is "as a result of". Of is missing, even that is can correct.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 am
- Thanked: 9 times
- Followed by:3 members
Here you want to show the result of an particular activity hence as a result is fineakhp77 wrote:I have a question in D
(d)and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
Correct idiom is "as a result of". Of is missing, even that is can correct.
However if you want to show the reason for a particular result
as a result of should be used.
- sumanr84
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 758
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:32 pm
- Location: Bangalore,India
- Thanked: 67 times
- Followed by:2 members
Issue with C is 'now costing about'. If we make use of infinitive then it should be ok I guess.kaulnikhil wrote:With adjustments for inflation,the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973
(a)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than
(b)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement as
(c)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(d)and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(e)and the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less as a result to implement than
[spoiler]What is the issue with C here ?? plz dont say that it doesn't sound good, so easy to eliminate[/spoiler]
(c)resulting in the welfare program now to cost about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did.
Any thoughts ?
I am on a break !!
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:45 pm
- Thanked: 2 times
:arrow: The official explanation says that the verb resulting cannot be used here because it does not have a real subject.Therefore "and as a result" is more correct.kaulnikhil wrote:With adjustments for inflation,the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973
(a)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than
(b)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement as
(c)resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(d)and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did
(e)and the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less as a result to implement than
[spoiler]What is the issue with C here ?? plz dont say that it doesn't sound good, so easy to eliminate[/spoiler]
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 11:12 pm
- Thanked: 7 times
Hi All,
I couldn't differentiate between C&D with any grammar rules. But based on the context, it appears that the drop in relative cost led to X. This requires a cause-and-effect kind of a sentence and D fits better for this scenario.
As for C, "Resulting" modifies the previous clause, which is not intended.
Please correct my understanding.
Thanks
HenryJEJO
I couldn't differentiate between C&D with any grammar rules. But based on the context, it appears that the drop in relative cost led to X. This requires a cause-and-effect kind of a sentence and D fits better for this scenario.
As for C, "Resulting" modifies the previous clause, which is not intended.
Please correct my understanding.
Thanks
HenryJEJO
- anuprajan5
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 10:56 pm
- Thanked: 60 times
- Followed by:10 members
What I could spot in C is the use of a comma. A comma is used when you separate independent clauses with a co-ordinating conjunction. The option in C is not an independent clause whereas D is an independent clause - As a result....
I agree with the idiomatic approach of - "as a result of", but none of the options have that usage.
Regards
Anup
I agree with the idiomatic approach of - "as a result of", but none of the options have that usage.
Regards
Anup