A photography dealer ordered 60 Model X cameras to be sold for $250 each, which represents a 20 percent markup over the dealer's initial cost for each camera. Of the cameras ordered, 6 were never sold and were returned to the manufacturer for a refund of 50 percent of the dealer's initial cost. What was the dealer's approximate profit or loss as a percent of the dealer's initial cost for the 60 cameras?
A.7% loss
B.13% loss
C.7% profit
D.13% profit
E.15% profit
photography
This topic has expert replies
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Since the question asks for a PERCENTAGE, ignore the numbers given.GmatKiss wrote:A photography dealer ordered 60 Model X cameras to be sold for $250 each, which represents a 20 percent markup over the dealer's initial cost for each camera. Of the cameras ordered, 6 were never sold and were returned to the manufacturer for a refund of 50 percent of the dealer's initial cost. What was the dealer's approximate profit or loss as a percent of the dealer's initial cost for the 60 cameras?
A.7% loss
B.13% loss
C.7% profit
D.13% profit
E.15% profit
Plug in values that satisfy the given conditions and make the math easy.
The fraction of cameras not sold = 6/60 = 1/10.
Let the number of cameras ordered = 10.
Let the cost per camera = 10.
Total cost = 10*10 = 100.
The number not sold = (1/10)10 = 1.
For this one camera, the refund received = .5(10) = 5.
The number of cameras sold = 9.
With a markup of 20%, the selling price = 12.
Total revenue = 9*12 = 108.
Refund + revenue = 5+108 = 113, a profit of 13%.
The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:27 pm
- Thanked: 2 times
- Followed by:4 members
- GMAT Score:640
Mitch is it possible to ballpark the % value by doing the following? -
If all the 60 cameras were sold, then Profit % = 20%
If 50 cameras were sold, then Profit % = 0%
If 55 cameras were sold, then Profit = 10% (Benchmark)
Since, more than 50 cameras were sold, a Loss is NOT possible. Eliminate A & B.
In this case, technically 57 cameras have been sold. (54 + Half Revenue for 6 cameras) So the profit % has to be > 10%. Eliminate C.
To get a 15% Profit > 57 cameras have to be sold. Eliminate E.
Only answer is 13%.
If all the 60 cameras were sold, then Profit % = 20%
If 50 cameras were sold, then Profit % = 0%
If 55 cameras were sold, then Profit = 10% (Benchmark)
Since, more than 50 cameras were sold, a Loss is NOT possible. Eliminate A & B.
In this case, technically 57 cameras have been sold. (54 + Half Revenue for 6 cameras) So the profit % has to be > 10%. Eliminate C.
To get a 15% Profit > 57 cameras have to be sold. Eliminate E.
Only answer is 13%.
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:27 pm
- Thanked: 2 times
- Followed by:4 members
- GMAT Score:640
Mitch is it possible to ballpark the % value by doing the following? -GMATGuruNY wrote:Since the question asks for a PERCENTAGE, ignore the numbers given.GmatKiss wrote:A photography dealer ordered 60 Model X cameras to be sold for $250 each, which represents a 20 percent markup over the dealer's initial cost for each camera. Of the cameras ordered, 6 were never sold and were returned to the manufacturer for a refund of 50 percent of the dealer's initial cost. What was the dealer's approximate profit or loss as a percent of the dealer's initial cost for the 60 cameras?
A.7% loss
B.13% loss
C.7% profit
D.13% profit
E.15% profit
Plug in values that satisfy the given conditions and make the math easy.
The fraction of cameras not sold = 6/60 = 1/10.
Let the number of cameras ordered = 10.
Let the cost per camera = 10.
Total cost = 10*10 = 100.
The number not sold = (1/10)10 = 1.
For this one camera, the refund received = .5(10) = 5.
The number of cameras sold = 9.
With a markup of 20%, the selling price = 12.
Total revenue = 9*12 = 108.
Refund + revenue = 5+108 = 113, a profit of 13%.
The correct answer is D.
If all the 60 cameras were sold, then Profit % = 20%
If 50 cameras were sold, then Profit % = 0%
If 55 cameras were sold, then Profit = 10% (Benchmark)
Since, more than 50 cameras were sold, a Loss is NOT possible. Eliminate A & B.
In this case, technically 57 cameras have been sold. (54 + Half Revenue for 6 cameras) So the profit % has to be > 10%. Eliminate C.
To get a 15% Profit > 57 cameras have to be sold. Eliminate E.
Only answer is 13%.
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Nice job.Jayanth2689 wrote:Mitch is it possible to ballpark the % value by doing the following? -GMATGuruNY wrote:Since the question asks for a PERCENTAGE, ignore the numbers given.GmatKiss wrote:A photography dealer ordered 60 Model X cameras to be sold for $250 each, which represents a 20 percent markup over the dealer's initial cost for each camera. Of the cameras ordered, 6 were never sold and were returned to the manufacturer for a refund of 50 percent of the dealer's initial cost. What was the dealer's approximate profit or loss as a percent of the dealer's initial cost for the 60 cameras?
A.7% loss
B.13% loss
C.7% profit
D.13% profit
E.15% profit
Plug in values that satisfy the given conditions and make the math easy.
The fraction of cameras not sold = 6/60 = 1/10.
Let the number of cameras ordered = 10.
Let the cost per camera = 10.
Total cost = 10*10 = 100.
The number not sold = (1/10)10 = 1.
For this one camera, the refund received = .5(10) = 5.
The number of cameras sold = 9.
With a markup of 20%, the selling price = 12.
Total revenue = 9*12 = 108.
Refund + revenue = 5+108 = 113, a profit of 13%.
The correct answer is D.
If all the 60 cameras were sold, then Profit % = 20%
If 50 cameras were sold, then Profit % = 0%
If 55 cameras were sold, then Profit = 10% (Benchmark)
Since, more than 50 cameras were sold, a Loss is NOT possible. Eliminate A & B.
In this case, technically 57 cameras have been sold. (54 + Half Revenue for 6 cameras) So the profit % has to be > 10%. Eliminate C.
To get a 15% Profit > 57 cameras have to be sold. Eliminate E.
Only answer is 13%.
One more approach:
54 cameras yield a 20% profit, while 6 cameras suffer a 50% loss.
Average for all 60 cameras = (54*20 - 6*50)/60 = 780/60 = 13.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 9:57 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:19 am
Honestly, how do you come up with this?
It's incredible! Thanks a lot! I've been going over the problem all night!
It's incredible! Thanks a lot! I've been going over the problem all night!
A big question I have is, why does following method give different answer though I believe there is no flaw in my method of attempting this problem -
Purchase price per camera = 250/1.2 = 1250/6.
Total purchase price = 60 * 1250/6 = 12500$
Got return money because of 6 cameras which were returned = 50% of 6 = [(6 * 250/1.2)/2] = 625$
Effective purchase price = 12500 - 625 = 11875$
Total sale = 54 * 250 = 13500$.
Hence % profit = [(Total sale - effective purchase price) / (effective purchase price)] x 100
= [(13500 - 11875) / 11875] x 100
= (1625/11875) x 100
= 13.684 Ans.
Dealer paid total cost of 60 cameras and then I deducted 50% cost of 6 cameras from that instead of adding it as a revenue.
So in this case, technically 54 cameras have been sold and 57 were bought.
Can anyone explain why can't I do that way?
TIA
Purchase price per camera = 250/1.2 = 1250/6.
Total purchase price = 60 * 1250/6 = 12500$
Got return money because of 6 cameras which were returned = 50% of 6 = [(6 * 250/1.2)/2] = 625$
Effective purchase price = 12500 - 625 = 11875$
Total sale = 54 * 250 = 13500$.
Hence % profit = [(Total sale - effective purchase price) / (effective purchase price)] x 100
= [(13500 - 11875) / 11875] x 100
= (1625/11875) x 100
= 13.684 Ans.
Dealer paid total cost of 60 cameras and then I deducted 50% cost of 6 cameras from that instead of adding it as a revenue.
So in this case, technically 54 cameras have been sold and 57 were bought.
Can anyone explain why can't I do that way?
TIA
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
It's important to recognize that we really don't need to use the information about the cameras selling for $250 each. The question boils down to . . .A photography dealer ordered 60 Model X cameras to be sold for $250 each, which represents a 20 percent markup over the dealer's initial cost for each camera. Of the cameras ordered, 6 were never sold and were returned to the manufacturer for a refund of 50 percent of the dealer's initial cost. What was the dealer's approximate profit or loss as a percent of the dealer's initial cost for the 60 cameras?
A.7% loss
B.13% loss
C.7% profit
D.13% profit
E.15% profit
54 cameras were sold at a 20% markup, and 6 cameras were (essentially) sold at a 50% markdown. What was the approximate profit or loss as a percent of the dealer's initial cost for all 60 cameras?
So, we can assign A NICE value of $100 to the initial cost per camera.
This means the 60 cameras cost $6000 to buy.
54 cameras were sold at a 20% markup and 6 cameras were sold at a 50% markdown.
So, 54 cameras were sold for $120, and 6 cameras were sold for $50.
(54)($120) + (6)($50) = $6780
So, the cameras were sold for $6780
This represents a profit of $780 (eliminate A and B)
If the initial cost was $6000, we must determine the percentage equivalent to $780/$6000
$780/$6000 = 78/600 = 13/100 = 13%
Answer = D
Cheers,
Brent
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:39 am
- Thanked: 14 times
- Followed by:5 members
Dear GMATGuru,GMATGuruNY wrote:Since the question asks for a PERCENTAGE, ignore the numbers given.GmatKiss wrote:A photography dealer ordered 60 Model X cameras to be sold for $250 each, which represents a 20 percent markup over the dealer's initial cost for each camera. Of the cameras ordered, 6 were never sold and were returned to the manufacturer for a refund of 50 percent of the dealer's initial cost. What was the dealer's approximate profit or loss as a percent of the dealer's initial cost for the 60 cameras?
A.7% loss
B.13% loss
C.7% profit
D.13% profit
E.15% profit
Plug in values that satisfy the given conditions and make the math easy.
The fraction of cameras not sold = 6/60 = 1/10.
Let the number of cameras ordered = 10.
Let the cost per camera = 10.
Total cost = 10*10 = 100.
The number not sold = (1/10)10 = 1.
For this one camera, the refund received = .5(10) = 5.
The number of cameras sold = 9.
With a markup of 20%, the selling price = 12.
Total revenue = 9*12 = 108.
Refund + revenue = 5+108 = 113, a profit of 13%.
The correct answer is D.
In solving the problem, your logic here is that you treated the 6 cameras as if sold at loss. But I have another logic ( I will follow your numbers):
Net Total cost = 9 * 10 + 1 * 5 = 95..............Here, I added the half cost of 1 camera that I already paid as it is still a cost)
Total Revenue = 9 * 12 = 108
Profit =13
Profit% = 13/95 = 13. 68%
Why is there difference between both methods? where did I go wrong with my thinking?
Thanks
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
The portion in red does not reflect the question at hand.Mo2men wrote:Net Total cost = 9 * 10 + 1 * 5 = 95..............Here, I added the half cost of 1 camera that I already paid as it is still a cost)
where did I go wrong with my thinking?
The question stem asks for the profit or loss as a percentage not of the NET cost but of the INITIAL cost.
Initially -- before the refund -- the dealer buys 10 cameras at a cost of $10 per camera.
Thus, the initial cost = 10*10 = $100.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:39 am
- Thanked: 14 times
- Followed by:5 members
Good hint.GMATGuruNY wrote:The portion in red does not reflect the question at hand.Mo2men wrote:Net Total cost = 9 * 10 + 1 * 5 = 95..............Here, I added the half cost of 1 camera that I already paid as it is still a cost)
where did I go wrong with my thinking?
The question stem asks for the profit or loss as a percentage not of the NET cost but of the INITIAL cost.
Initially -- before the refund -- the dealer buys 10 cameras at a cost of $10 per camera.
Thus, the initial cost = 10*10 = $100.
Regardless of the question, why both methods give different results? shouldn't both reflect the same?
In my method, there is some cost incurred with the items returned to the manufacture with partial refund.
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
In your solution, you calculate the following:Mo2men wrote:Why both methods give different results? should both reflect the same?
(profit)/(resulting cost after the refund)
In my solution, the following is calculated:
(profit)/(initial cost before the refund)
The resulting cost AFTER THE REFUND is not the same as the initial cost BEFORE THE REFUND.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3