Permutation or Combination?

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 12:35 am

Permutation or Combination?

by s.pharmaco » Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:58 am
A man wants to visit at least two of the four cities A, B, C and D. how many travel itineries can he make? all cities are connected to one another.

Can somebody please explain why we need to use permutation here and not combination?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 11:12 am
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:2 members

by Anindya Madhudor » Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:27 am
Say the man wants to visit just 2 cities of the 4 cities. Then, you have the following 6 options:

AB AC AD BC BC CD

This 6 options can be obtained by using the combination formula 4C2.

But, in this case, itinerary means AB is not the same as BA, which means you can start with either city A or city B and have two different itinerary. Hence the problem becomes a permutation problem. So, you need to multiply 6 by 2 to obtain 12 as answer for ways you can form an itinerary to visit 2 cities out of 4 cities.

Hope this makes sense.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 12:35 am

by s.pharmaco » Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:05 am
Thanks for your reply. so in this question is "all cities are connected to one another" the cue to decide what we need to apply here (P or C)?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 11:12 am
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:2 members

by Anindya Madhudor » Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:19 am
If the question asks for "how many ways the man can choose 2 or more cities for his itinerary", then it would be a combination problem. The key here is that starting from city A is not the same as starting from city B. So, AB and BA are different itineraries.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 12:35 am

by s.pharmaco » Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:07 am
okies cool now understood.. Thanks...

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 2:01 pm
Thanked: 39 times
Followed by:2 members

by puneetkhurana2000 » Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:22 pm
Good work Anindya Madhudor!!!

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 11:12 am
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:2 members

by Anindya Madhudor » Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:19 pm
Thank you, Puneet!

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 7:14 pm
Location: India
Thanked: 47 times
Followed by:6 members

by The Iceman » Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:49 am
s.pharmaco wrote:A man wants to visit at least two of the four cities A, B, C and D. how many travel itineries can he make? all cities are connected to one another.

Can somebody please explain why we need to use permutation here and not combination?
It's basically a problem on arrangements because order matters here.

First you can arrange all 4 cities. Then select three cities out of four and arrange those three cities. Lastly, select two out of the four and arrange those two cities.

4!+(4C3)*3!+4C2*2! = 60

You could also see this as 4P4 + 4P3 + 4P2, but it is easier to follow the convention using combination "C", given you are bale to apply the logic correctly.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 1:09 am

by mneeti » Mon Jul 22, 2013 5:19 am
The Iceman wrote:
s.pharmaco wrote:A man wants to visit at least two of the four cities A, B, C and D. how many travel itineries can he make? all cities are connected to one another.

Can somebody please explain why we need to use permutation here and not combination?
It's basically a problem on arrangements because order matters here.

First you can arrange all 4 cities. Then select three cities out of four and arrange those three cities. Lastly, select two out of the four and arrange those two cities.

4!+(4C3)*3!+4C2*2! = 60

You could also see this as 4P4 + 4P3 + 4P2, but it is easier to follow the convention using combination "C", given you are bale to apply the logic correctly.
I tried a different approach to solve this question, though its wrong but I want to understand why my approach is wrong here. Please help on that!

There are 4 cites,so for each city we have 2 options either 'Yes' or 'No' making the no. of ways available = 2x2x2x2 = 16

Now, we have to make itineraries picking at least 2 cities. This can be done by eliminating 1) Where we have 'No' in all the cities, there is only one way it can happen=1 2)Where only one city is not picked, this can happen in four ways [YYYN] [YYNY] [YNYY] [NYYY] =4.

Therefore, the no. of ways itineraries can be made picking at least two cities = 16-1-4=11.

What is wrong with my approach?

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Mon Jul 22, 2013 10:11 am
Hi mneeti,

Your approach doesn't account for the ORDER of the stops on the itinerary.

Going to City A first and City B second is NOT THE SAME as going to City B first and City A second.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 468
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:20 pm
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:4 members

by vipulgoyal » Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:29 am
My take 40,
the qustion asks how many travel itineries can he make if he wants to visit at least 2 cities
it means differant itineries for visiting 2 cities + differant itineries for visiting 3 cities

for 2 cities (since all cities are connected to one another)
A-B-C "A to B to C"
A-C-D
A-D-B
A-B-C
Like starting with A we have 4 itineries same for B,C and D
4+4+4+4 = 16
Smae as for 3 cities

fix A in first position, rest B,C and D can be rearranges in 6 ways
same as for B,C, and D

6+6+6+6 = 24

24 + 16 = 40 Inineries are possible