in January 1994 an oil barge ran aground off the coast of San Juan, Puerto Rico, leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean, while causing the pollution of the city's beaches.
A. leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean, while causing the pollution of
B. with its cargo of 750000 gallons leaking into the ocean, and it polluted
C. and its cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean, polluting
D. while it leaked its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean and caused the pollution
of
E. so that its cargo of 750000 gallons leaked into the ocean, and they were polluting.
OA-C
What is wrong with A? Can anyone throw some light on "while"?
Oil Leak
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:30 am
- Thanked: 15 times
- Followed by:2 members
- Domnu
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:55 pm
- Thanked: 11 times
- GMAT Score:740
Generally, the use of "while" indicates simultaneous events... here it's not really that likely that the beaches were being polluted at the same time that the oil was being spilled; this is more of a long-term result.
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 2:22 am
- Location: hyderabad
hey...
cargo was not leaked intentionally.."a" gives us that kinda meaning...
"c" is correct..
cargo was not leaked intentionally.."a" gives us that kinda meaning...
"c" is correct..
rahul
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:30 am
- Thanked: 15 times
- Followed by:2 members
- hk
- MBA Student
- Posts: 532
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:39 pm
- Location: Barcelona
- Thanked: 33 times
- Followed by:9 members
- GMAT Score:640
I eliminated A because of the last word. "Pollution of the beaches" is ungrammatical. Polluting the beaches is a desired construction.
@ Kenen750: I dont think your assessment is correct. Leaking is a modifying phrase and is correct in its usage.
The ship wrecked at the coast of Florida, leaking its cargo into the bay - is a correct sentence. Try substituting Leaked in this place and you'll realize your mistake.
@ Kenen750: I dont think your assessment is correct. Leaking is a modifying phrase and is correct in its usage.
The ship wrecked at the coast of Florida, leaking its cargo into the bay - is a correct sentence. Try substituting Leaked in this place and you'll realize your mistake.
Wanna know what I'm upto? Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/harikrish
- dumb.doofus
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 2:02 pm
- Location: San Jose, CA
- Thanked: 43 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:720
Replying as I was PMed.
Just to make it sound simpler first, let's put the sentence in layman terms..
Oil Barge = Ship that carries oil
Ran Aground = got stranded on ground.. or beach..
ok now the sentence dissects into..
A ship got stranded off the coast ---- (a)
Its cargo leaked into the ocean ---- (b)
(b) caused pollution of city's beaches ---- (c)
A is incorrect because of the use of "while". While is used to show contrast and not cause.
B is incorrect too.. as it uses the participle "leaking" instead of the past tense "leaked".. remember this incidence happened in 1994.. Its a past thing..
C is perfect. Why? well, it follows how we have dissected the sentence above. First event (ship got stranded) + second event (its cargo leaked) + effect of second event (polluting city's beaches)
D Can't use "while".. as described above.
E Non-sensically means that the ship intentionally got stranded so that it could leak its cargo.. this sentence fails to show the two separate events and the cause and effect relationship as option C shows. Also, use of "they" is inappropriate.
Just to make it sound simpler first, let's put the sentence in layman terms..
Oil Barge = Ship that carries oil
Ran Aground = got stranded on ground.. or beach..
ok now the sentence dissects into..
A ship got stranded off the coast ---- (a)
Its cargo leaked into the ocean ---- (b)
(b) caused pollution of city's beaches ---- (c)
A is incorrect because of the use of "while". While is used to show contrast and not cause.
B is incorrect too.. as it uses the participle "leaking" instead of the past tense "leaked".. remember this incidence happened in 1994.. Its a past thing..
C is perfect. Why? well, it follows how we have dissected the sentence above. First event (ship got stranded) + second event (its cargo leaked) + effect of second event (polluting city's beaches)
D Can't use "while".. as described above.
E Non-sensically means that the ship intentionally got stranded so that it could leak its cargo.. this sentence fails to show the two separate events and the cause and effect relationship as option C shows. Also, use of "they" is inappropriate.
One love, one blood, one life. You got to do what you should.
https://dreambigdreamhigh.blocked/
https://gmattoughies.blocked/
https://dreambigdreamhigh.blocked/
https://gmattoughies.blocked/
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 10:03 pm
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:2 members
Hi DD,dumb.doofus wrote: A is incorrect because of the use of "while". While is used to show contrast and not cause.
IMO while is used for two purposes:
1. Contrast...e.g.
Sensex fell yesterday, while Nifty rose yesterday.
2. simultaneous action....e.g.
While going to office yesterday, Mohan met his mother.
Why can't it be case of simultaneous action here ? i.e. #2......
Probably as Domnu pointed out above...shouldn't it be good enough reason ?
Here C is correct, as although it is present participle it is used to show the result....
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
goelmohit2002 wrote:not simultaneous action. one of these is the CONSEQUENCE of the other; they are not two separate events happening at the same time.dumb.doofus wrote:Why can't it be case of simultaneous action here ?
if you say "X-ing while Y-ing", then you must be describing two separate but simultaneous actions.
--
incidentally, this is an absolutely textbook-perfect case of a situation in which you should use COMMA + -ING.
for more or that particular construction, see here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/which-usage- ... tml#183920
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:2 members
lunarpower wrote:Thanks Ron !!goelmohit2002 wrote:not simultaneous action. one of these is the CONSEQUENCE of the other; they are not two separate events happening at the same time.dumb.doofus wrote:Why can't it be case of simultaneous action here ?
if you say "X-ing while Y-ing", then you must be describing two separate but simultaneous actions.
--
incidentally, this is an absolutely textbook-perfect case of a situation in which you should use COMMA + -ING.
for more or that particular construction, see here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/which-usage- ... tml#183920
Would it have been correct to say i.e. removing "while" from A ?
"leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean, causing the pollution of"
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
no. you can't use two comma+ing modifiers in a row.goelmohit2002 wrote:Would it have been correct to say i.e. removing "while" from A ?
"leaking its cargo of 750000 gallons into the ocean, causing the pollution of"
you could make that choice reasonable with a little further editing, i.e., "leaking its cargo of 750,000 gallons into the ocean and thus causing..."
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
- hariharakarthi
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:54 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
- GMAT Score:550
B. with its cargo of 750000 gallons leaking into the ocean, and it polluted
in January 1994 an oil barge ran aground off the coast of San Juan, Puerto Rico, with its cargo of 750000 gallons leaking into the ocean, and it polluted
the city's beaches.
Is it a pronoun error?
Can you explain what is wrong with B?
Regards,
hhk
in January 1994 an oil barge ran aground off the coast of San Juan, Puerto Rico, with its cargo of 750000 gallons leaking into the ocean, and it polluted
the city's beaches.
Is it a pronoun error?
Can you explain what is wrong with B?
Regards,
hhk
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
if you write "...with X VERBing", the implication is that this is happening at the same time as the verb in the main clause.hariharakarthi wrote:B. with its cargo of 750000 gallons leaking into the ocean, and it polluted
in January 1994 an oil barge ran aground off the coast of San Juan, Puerto Rico, with its cargo of 750000 gallons leaking into the ocean, and it polluted
the city's beaches.
Is it a pronoun error?
Can you explain what is wrong with B?
Regards,
hhk
analogy:
roy ran down the hallway, with his arms flapping frantically.
the implication is that roy's arms are flapping frantically AS he runs down the hallway.
by the same reasoning, the above choice (b) asserts that the oil was already leaking in the ocean AS the barge ran aground. this clearly isn't the case; the two events actually occurred in sequence, and the one was the consequence of the other.
--
the other problem with that choice is "...and it polluted..."
you don't use "and" in this sense unless the two items you're describing are essentially independent of each other.
for instance, if i said the following:
there was lots of traffic on the freeway and i was late to work.
...then i'm implying, strangely enough, that the traffic had nothing to do with my being late. (perhaps i'm just listing two reasons why it was A Bad Day.)
on the other hand, you could salvage the construction with a connector word that implies causation, such as "so" or "thus". for instance, either of the following would convey the intended meaning accurately in the aforementioned case:
there was lots of traffic on the freeway and i was thus late to work.
there was lots of traffic on the freeway and so i was late to work.
these are both ok.
however, choice (b) doesn't use such a word; it merely uses "and" by itself, which, for the reasons mentioned above, is wrong.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:2 members
Thanks Ron !!!lunarpower wrote:if you write "...with X VERBing", the implication is that this is happening at the same time as the verb in the main clause.hariharakarthi wrote:B. with its cargo of 750000 gallons leaking into the ocean, and it polluted
in January 1994 an oil barge ran aground off the coast of San Juan, Puerto Rico, with its cargo of 750000 gallons leaking into the ocean, and it polluted
the city's beaches.
Is it a pronoun error?
Can you explain what is wrong with B?
Regards,
hhk
analogy:
roy ran down the hallway, with his arms flapping frantically.
the implication is that roy's arms are flapping frantically AS he runs down the hallway.
by the same reasoning, the above choice (b) asserts that the oil was already leaking in the ocean AS the barge ran aground. this clearly isn't the case; the two events actually occurred in sequence, and the one was the consequence of the other.
--
the other problem with that choice is "...and it polluted..."
you don't use "and" in this sense unless the two items you're describing are essentially independent of each other.
for instance, if i said the following:
there was lots of traffic on the freeway and i was late to work.
...then i'm implying, strangely enough, that the traffic had nothing to do with my being late. (perhaps i'm just listing two reasons why it was A Bad Day.)
on the other hand, you could salvage the construction with a connector word that implies causation, such as "so" or "thus". for instance, either of the following would convey the intended meaning accurately in the aforementioned case:
there was lots of traffic on the freeway and i was thus late to work.
there was lots of traffic on the freeway and so i was late to work.
these are both ok.
however, choice (b) doesn't use such a word; it merely uses "and" by itself, which, for the reasons mentioned above, is wrong.
Moreover I guess.....there is no referent for "it" in B...
Kindly tell if there is flaw in my reasoning....