OG10#88 - verb tense confusion ?

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:07 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:2 members

OG10#88 - verb tense confusion ?

by sui generis » Wed Jul 18, 2012 2:23 am
The Emperor Augustus, it appears, commissioned an idealized sculpture portrait, the features of which are so unrealistic as to constitute what one scholar calls an "artificial face."

(A) so unrealistic as to constitute
(B) so unrealistic they constituted
(C) so unrealistic that they have constituted
(D) unrealistic enough so that they constitute
(E) unrealistic enough so as to constitute

OA: A

The official explanation states: The verbs are and calls indicate that the sculpture is being viewed and judged in the present. Thus, neither the past tense verb constituted (in B) nor the present perfect verb have constituted (in C) is correct; both suggest that the statue's features once constituted an artificial face but no longer do so.

I couldn't get how 'have constituted' can be rejected on the aforementioned grounds.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Jul 18, 2012 3:22 am
sui generis wrote:The Emperor Augustus, it appears, commissioned an idealized sculpture portrait, the features of which are so unrealistic as to constitute what one scholar calls an "artificial face."

(A) so unrealistic as to constitute
(B) so unrealistic they constituted
(C) so unrealistic that they have constituted
(D) unrealistic enough so that they constitute
(E) unrealistic enough so as to constitute

OA: A

The official explanation states: The verbs are and calls indicate that the sculpture is being viewed and judged in the present. Thus, neither the past tense verb constituted (in B) nor the present perfect verb have constituted (in C) is correct; both suggest that the statue's features once constituted an artificial face but no longer do so.

I couldn't get how 'have constituted' can be rejected on the aforementioned grounds.
To indicate a GENERAL TRUTH -- something that is true now and will remain true in the future -- we use the PRESENT TENSE.
The features of the sculpture are a general truth.
Thus, the present tense is appropriate here:
The features ARE so unrealistic as TO CONSTITUTE what one scholar CALLS an "artificial face".

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:07 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:2 members

by sui generis » Wed Jul 18, 2012 4:29 am
Thanks Mitch for the quick reply.

I concur with your reasoning; definitely A is better than C. However, in absence of choice A would choice C be correct ? As such I don't see any problem with 'have constituted'.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 299
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:27 am
Thanked: 9 times
Followed by:2 members

by hey_thr67 » Wed Jul 18, 2012 6:39 am
why not D is correct ?

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 1:59 am
Followed by:1 members

by katy_123 » Wed Jul 18, 2012 7:32 am
the correct idiom is "so X as to Y"

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:07 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:2 members

by sui generis » Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:45 am
why not D is correct ?
D uses both 'enough' and 'so that', making the construction redundant and awkward.

Using either is the correct usage.
e.g. - X are unrealistic enough to constitute Y
OR X are so unrealistic that they constitute Y
OR X are so unrealistic as to constitute Y

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 434
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:42 pm
Location: Bangalore, India
Thanked: 91 times
Followed by:46 members

by EducationAisle » Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:45 am
katy_123 wrote:the correct idiom is "so X as to Y"
Looks like this is debatable. While I seem to remember coming across a recent GMATPrep question that uses this idiom, it is interesting to note the OE for OG 12 #37, option C:

The construction so x as to y is not a correct idiom.

But then, some of the OEs are known to be not exactly high class.
Ashish
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:

a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana

b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 150
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:19 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by mv12 » Wed Jul 18, 2012 9:01 am
My pick A

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 979
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:38 am
Location: Hyderabad, India
Thanked: 49 times
Followed by:12 members
GMAT Score:700

by bubbliiiiiiii » Thu Jul 19, 2012 12:13 am
sui generis wrote:The Emperor Augustus, it appears, commissioned an idealized sculpture portrait, the features of which are so unrealistic as to constitute what one scholar calls an "artificial face."

(A) so unrealistic as to constitute
(B) so unrealistic they constituted
(C) so unrealistic that they have constituted
(D) unrealistic enough so that they constitute
(E) unrealistic enough so as to constitute
Between A and E, I preferred A for idiomatic usage.
Regards,

Pranay