Hi,
The correct answer is B) but I need an explanation to better understnad why B is correct..... thanks
59. His studies of ice-polished rocks in his Alpine homeland, far outside the range of present-day glaciers, led Louis Agassiz in 1837 to propose the concept of an age in which great ice sheets had existed in now currently temperate areas.
(A) in which great ice sheets had existed in now currently temperate areas
(B) in which great ice sheets existed in what are now temperate areas
(C) when great ice sheets existed where there were areas now temperate
(D) when great ice sheets had existed in current temperate areas
(E) when great ice sheets existed in areas now that are temperate
Thanks
Peer
OG 11 SC 59
This topic has expert replies
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:16 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:44 am
- Thanked: 26 times
If you don't take time to underline the portion that needs to be corrected, it gets difficult for people to answer the Q. People who try to answer will need more time to solve the problem. Please underline.
can someone explain why we use simple past tense instead of past perfect?
i would think we need past perfect since this sentence obviously states his studies and also the ice sheets existed beforehand.
i would think we need past perfect since this sentence obviously states his studies and also the ice sheets existed beforehand.
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:16 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
The correct answer is B) but I need an explanation to better understnad why B is correct..... thanks
59. His studies of ice-polished rocks in his Alpine homeland, far outside the range of present-day glaciers, led Louis Agassiz in 1837 to propose the concept of an age in which great ice sheets had existed in now currently temperate areas.
(A) in which great ice sheets had existed in now currently temperate areas
(B) in which great ice sheets existed in what are now temperate areas
(C) when great ice sheets existed where there were areas now temperate
(D) when great ice sheets had existed in current temperate areas
(E) when great ice sheets existed in areas now that are temperate
Thanks
Peer
59. His studies of ice-polished rocks in his Alpine homeland, far outside the range of present-day glaciers, led Louis Agassiz in 1837 to propose the concept of an age in which great ice sheets had existed in now currently temperate areas.
(A) in which great ice sheets had existed in now currently temperate areas
(B) in which great ice sheets existed in what are now temperate areas
(C) when great ice sheets existed where there were areas now temperate
(D) when great ice sheets had existed in current temperate areas
(E) when great ice sheets existed in areas now that are temperate
Thanks
Peer
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:44 am
- Thanked: 26 times
A is wrong because now and current mean the same and induce redundancy
Is "in which" = when?? No
When refers to an exact time ( Some one correct me if I am wrong)
in which refers to a time period
So C, D & E are out.
Had existed is wrong because there are no 2 actions here and simple past is good enough
Is "in which" = when?? No
When refers to an exact time ( Some one correct me if I am wrong)
in which refers to a time period
So C, D & E are out.
Had existed is wrong because there are no 2 actions here and simple past is good enough
past perfect is needed when one action happened before another in the past! for exmp: i gave her flowers, that i had brought for her! (both actions happened in the past)
so in his consept ice sheets existed and thats all. pp is not needed here.
so in his consept ice sheets existed and thats all. pp is not needed here.
Impossible is nothing
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:2 members
Can someone please explain why "e" is wrong here ?
And why both "in which" and "when" can be used interchangeably here as per the explanation of OG-11 ?
And why both "in which" and "when" can be used interchangeably here as per the explanation of OG-11 ?
Questions:
1) I still don't fully understand why the simple past is preferred over the past perfect. Aren't we trying to say that the ice sheets "had existed" before Louis Agassiz "led to propose in 1837?" So "led" is in the simple past and so, shouldn't "had existed" be used to indicate that the ice sheets existed before his proposal?
2) In the OG, "In which" and "when" can be used interchangeably - I thought a hypothetical time frame requires "in which"
1) I still don't fully understand why the simple past is preferred over the past perfect. Aren't we trying to say that the ice sheets "had existed" before Louis Agassiz "led to propose in 1837?" So "led" is in the simple past and so, shouldn't "had existed" be used to indicate that the ice sheets existed before his proposal?
2) In the OG, "In which" and "when" can be used interchangeably - I thought a hypothetical time frame requires "in which"
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
it isn't. the past perfect would absolutely be acceptable in this sentence; it just happens that both examples containing the past perfect are wrong for other, entirely unrelated, reasons.CANDOGIRL wrote:Questions:
1) I still don't fully understand why the simple past is preferred over the past perfect.
specifically, (a) is unacceptably redundant, in that it says both "now" and "currently", while (d) suggests that the ice sheets actually existed in the current areas (an impossibility, since that would mean that past ice sheets existed in the present!).
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
again, both are acceptable.2) In the OG, "In which" and "when" can be used interchangeably - I thought a hypothetical time frame requires "in which"
you can use "in which" in any construction that would normally use the preposition "in".
for instance, i put my dirty clothes in that drawer <--> that is the drawer in which i put my dirty clothes
so, since things can happen in a time frame, it is acceptable to write "the time frame in which things happen".
to consider the acceptability of "when", you have to use an entirely different criterion -- this time not grammar, but, rather, context.
namely, if you are talking about a time period, then you can use the word "when". since this sentence is definitely talking about a time period, the use of "when" gets the green light here.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
Ron, your explanations are always so clear and precisely address the source of my confusion, relieving me of the question marks I had aobve my head prior to reading your answer; we are lucky to have you as a member of this online forum Ron
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
thanks!tnaim wrote:Ron, your explanations are always so clear and precisely address the source of my confusion, relieving me of the question marks I had aobve my head prior to reading your answer; we are lucky to have you as a member of this online forum Ron
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron