-
Target Test Prep 20% Off Flash Sale is on! Code: FLASH20
Redeem
Executive Assessment: Verbal Strategies – Part 6
Welcome to the sixth and final installment of Verbal Strategies for the EA! If youre just joining us now, I suggest going back to the first part and proceeding from there.
Last time, we tried a couple of Reading Comprehension (RC) questions. Ill copy the passage and second question again below, but do start from the previous article before you keep readingI discussed both the passage and the first question last time and Im going to assume you know those details already.
The following question(s are) based on material written in 1996: The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, signed in 1987 by more than 150 nations, has attained its short-term goals: it has decreased the rate of increase in amounts of most ozone-depleting chemicals reaching the atmosphere and has even reduced the atmospheric levels of some of them. The projection that the ozone layer will substantially recover from ozone depletion by 2050 is based on the assumption that the protocol's regulations will be strictly followed. Yet there is considerable evidence of violations, particularly in the form of the release of ozone-depleting chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), which are commonly used in the refrigeration, heating, and air-conditioning industries. These violations reflect industry attitudes; for example, in the United States, 48% of respondents in a recent survey of subscribers to Air Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration News, an industry trade journal, said that they did not believe that CFCs damage the ozone layer. Moreover, some in the industry apparently do not want to pay for CFC substitutes, which can run five times the cost of CFCs. Consequently, a black market in imported illicit CFCs has grown. Estimates of the contraband CFC trade range from 10,000 to 22,000 tons a year, with most of the CFCs originating in India and China, whose agreements under the Protocol still allow them to produce CFCs. In fact, the United States Customs Service reports that CFC-12 is a contraband problem second only to illicit drugs.According to the passage, which of the following best describes most ozone-depleting chemicals in 1996 as compared to those in 1987?
(A) The levels of such chemicals in the atmosphere had decreased.
(B) The number of such chemicals that reached the atmosphere had declined.
(C) The amounts of such chemicals released had increased but the amounts that reached the atmosphere had decreased.
(D) The rate of increase in amounts of such chemicals reaching the atmosphere had decreased.
(E) The rate at which such chemicals were being reduced in the atmosphere had slowed.
Heres our breakdown of the passage from last time:
MP: met ST goal: DTL
Proj: OL recover by 2050
But: some violating, dont believe (US)
black mkt: China India US
And the simple story:
Theres an international protocol to fix the ozone layer, and it has met its short-term goals, but theres strong reason to believe that it may not meet its long-term goal. Companies don't want to pay higher costs and this is leading to a black market in the US. Plus lots of detail about exactly how this is playing out.
Now lets tackle that second question.
According to the passage, which of the following best describes most ozone-depleting chemicals in 1996 as compared to those in 1987?
The language according to the passage indicates a Specific Detail question; theyre going to ask us to find something in the passage and give it right back to them, probably in slightly different words.
Note the very specific language here: chemicals in 1996 vs. 1987. Scan for that in the passage.
The following question(s are) based on material written in 1996: The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, signed in 1987 by more than 150 nations, has attained its short-term goals: it has decreased the rate of increase in amounts of most ozone-depleting chemicals reaching the atmosphere and has even reduced the atmospheric levels of some of them.
In 1987, things were bad enough that the Protocol was created and signed. By 1996, it had attained certain short-term goals: (1) the rate of increase of the ODCs (for short) had gone down, and (2) some of these ODCs actually decreased.
Step 3 asks you to predict an answer. On Specific Detail questions, stick tightly to the text. It told us two things were true of ozone-depleting chemicals. Look for one in the answers.
(A) The levels of such chemicals in the atmosphere had decreased.
Hmm. It does say that some had decreased. Is that close enough?
By omitting some kind of qualifier, such as some, this choice implies that the levels of all such chemicals went downand thats not the case. Id put a question mark next to this one, but I will abandon it immediately if I find something even a tiny bit better.
(B) The number of such chemicals that reached the atmosphere had declined.
The passage doesnt indicate that some of the chemicals no longer get up into the atmosphere. It indicates only that the rate of increase has declined for most and that some have decreasedbut not stopped entirely. Eliminate choice (B).
(C) The amounts of such chemicals released had increased but the amounts that reached the atmosphere had decreased.
The passage doesnt make a distinction between chemical release in general vs. chemicals reaching the atmosphere (and it says that only some decreased). Eliminate choice (C).
(D) The rate of increase in amounts of such chemicals reaching the atmosphere had decreased.
Wow, thats confusing. The rate of increasedecreased. Oh, waityes, they did say this! The passage literally says it has decreased the rate of increase in amounts of most ODCs. Perfect match!
Lets check the final answer, just to be sure.
(E) The rate at which such chemicals were being reduced in the atmosphere had slowed.
Again, really confusing. The rate at which they were being reducedhas slowed. They were being reduced at a certain rateand that rate has slowed down. No. That would be a bad thing. We wanted them to go down at a faster rateand thats exactly what the Montreal Protocol accomplished. This is the opposite of what the passage said; eliminate choice (E).
The correct answer is (D).
Key Takeaways for EA Reading Comprehension:
(1) RC is similar to CR: Identify the question first. Then dive back into the passage to find the particular sentence or sentences you need to help you predict your own answer. Finally, start eliminating bad answers and looking for an answer that matches your prediction.
(2) On Specific Detail questions, you mostly just need to repeat back something the passage has already told you. Theyre going to mix up or change the wording a little bittheyre not going to make it too easy for you! But thats basically all youre doing.
(3) Turn that knowledge into Know the Code flash cards:
* Executive Assessment questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.
Recent Articles
Archive
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009