-
Target Test Prep 20% Off Flash Sale is on! Code: FLASH20
Redeem
Executive Assessment: Quant Strategies for Faster Solutions – Part 6
Welcome to the sixth installment of Quant Strategies for the EA! If youre just joining us now, head back to the first part and work your way back here.
Were going to revisit a strategy weve seen earlier in the series but Im not going to tell you which one. Give yourself about 3 to 3.5 minutes for the below 2-Part Integrated Reasoning question (currently #4 in the 2-Part free problem set on the official EA website).
Practice Problem
Over a period of 5 academic years from Fall 1999 through Spring 2004, the number of faculty at a certain college increased despite a decrease in student enrollment from 5,500 students in Fall 1999.In the given expressions, F and S represent the percent change in the number of faculty and students, respectively, over the 5 academic years, and R represents the number of students per faculty member in Fall 1999. The percent change in a quantity X is calculated using the formula [pmath]({X_new-X_old}/X_old)(100)[/pmath].
Select the expression that represents the number of faculty in Fall 1999, and select the expression that represents the number of students per faculty member in Spring 2004. Make only two selections, one in each column.
Got your answers? Lets go!
First, lets get the basic information down on paper. That first paragraph is pretty straightforwardlets make a table.
The second paragraph oh, I see. Theyre defining F and S in a certain way, so I cant use those variables to mean the number of faculty members or the number of students. Okay, jot that down. And then theres this third variable, R, that really is based on the number of each Ill jot that down using words, since I cant use the same variables.
So that R thing is just for 1999 but I cant use F and S as variables oh, wait a second. They gave me the number of students in 995,500. So I can actually write R as:
Okay, now what? What do they want me to find? First hey, the number of faculty in Fall 1999! Thats right there in that formula. I wonder, can I just rearrange it to isolate fac?
R(fac) = 5500
fac = (5500) / R
Check it out! Thats answer choice (B). Done!
The correct answer for the first column, number of faculty in Fall 1999, is (B): [pmath]{5500/R}[/pmath].
And I didnt even have to use smart numbers! But if I had been uncertain at all, this is where Id have plugged in some real numbers to see whats going on.
Okay, what about that second column? The number of students per faculty member in Spring 2004 thats more complicated. Lets try some real numbers for this one.
What will work nicely with 5,500? Lets say that there were 550 faculty members in 1999. So now I can find R do I need to, though? Thats for 1999 and this column asks about 2004.
Glance at the answers. They all include R, so we do actually have to find R now.
R = students / faculty = 5500 / 550 = 10 / 1 = 10
Now, what happens in 2004? The number of faculty increases, but the number of students decreases.
Lets see. Oh, and then well have to be able to calculate the percent change so lets actually start with the percent change. Lets take students down by how about 10%. (Grab your calculatorits IR, so youre allowed!if you dont want to figure this out on paper.)
(10%)(5500) = 550
5500 550 = 4,950
Remember that S is a 10% decrease; you can also think of this as S = 10% (minus 10%).
Lets say F, on the other hand, goes up by 20%. (Again, grab your calculator if you like.)
(20%)(550) = (55)(2) = 110
550 + 110 = 660
So F = +20% and the new student / faculty ratio is 4950/ 660 = 7.5.
Think about all of that math that you just did. You had to find R, and you also had to find S and F. So the correct answer should include all three variables. Glance at the answersit cant be the first three. If you feel like youre running low on time right now, you might just guess among the other three.
Here are two ways to finish the problem off from here: the extra-special-cool shortcut and the remaining official smart numbers process.
The extra-special-cool shortcut
Again, think about the math that you had to do. The faculty number increased from its starting point, but the student number decreased from its starting point. Look at the remaining three answers. The F part should be 100 + F oh, all three of them say that. Thats not useful.
What about S? Remember that S is a negative. So how should that show up in this expression?
100 (a negative) will end up getting biggernot what we want
100 + (a negative), on the other hand, will get smaller
Only one answer uses 100 + S: answer (D). Were done!
If youre thinking, Uh, sorry, but thats a little too extra-special clever for me WHAT?? then ignore this shortcut and read the next part.
If the extra-special-cool shortcut does work for you, then you dont even need to pick numbers and work through any of the math in the first place. If youre confident in your mathematical reasoning, you can basically just logic your way to answer (D) in the first place. :)
The smart numbers finish
Our last step is to plug into the answers to find our desired solution.
R = 10
S = 10
F = +20
Ignore the first three choices and start with answer (D).
[pmath]({100+S}/{100+F})R=[/pmath]
[pmath]({100+(-10)}/{100+20})(10)=[/pmath]
[pmath](90/120)(10)=[/pmath]
[pmath]7.5[/pmath]
That's a match! The correct answer for the second column is (D).
What did you learn here? Articulate your takeaways before you look at mine below.
Key Takeaways Smart Numbers (especially on IR):
(1) On IR, make sure you understand the story. If you do, you can save yourself a lot of time and trouble, as we did on the first half of the problem; if you dont understand the story, guess and move on.
(2) On IR problems, it may not be the case that we really need to choose numbers and do the mathwe may be able to think through whats happening and go straight to the answers. We did this for the first column and could even do it for the second (though that one was trickier). And if we do need to do some math, we can still choose smart numbers in the same way we would on a regular old math problem from the quant section of the test.
(3) Turn that knowledge into Know the Code flash cards:
* Executive Assessment questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.
Recent Articles
Archive
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009