-
Target Test Prep 20% Off Flash Sale is on! Code: FLASH20
Redeem
Know the GMAT Code: Interest Rates on the GMAT
Im excited about the problem I have to share with you today in the latest installment of our Know the Code series. :) Interest rate problems can be extremely annoying on the GMATyou might find yourself spending 4 minutes and still having to guess in the end. So your first decision is whether you even want to tackle these kinds of problems in the first place.
But there are some things you can learn that could make answering interest rate questions a lot less irritating. Try out this Integrated Reasoning (IR) Two-Part problem from the GMATPrep free practice exams. (Note: This one is an IR question, but I could absolutely see them testing the same principle on a Quant problem.)
If youre planning to guess on 3 questions in the IR section, then you can give yourself 3 minutes and 20 seconds to do this problem. If youre planning to guess on 2 questions, then give yourself 3 minutes.
*Loan X has a principal of $10,000x and a yearly simple interest rate of 4%. Loan Y has a principal of $10,000y and a yearly simple interest rate of 8%. Loans X and Y will be consolidated to form Loan Z with a principal of $(10,000x + 10,000y) and a yearly simple interest rate of r%, where. In the table, select a value for x and a value for y corresponding to a yearly simple interest rate of 5% for the consolidated loan. Make only two selections, one in each column.
Ready?
1-second Glance. Two-Part. Wall of words! Storywill need to translate.
Read and Jot. This ones so complex that I needed to read it twice, and I didnt start writing anything till the second time. Sometimes you need to do that with story problems.
There are two loans with some details and then a third one thats a combination of the first two. Interesting. Lets start with the first two.
Reflect. Im also going to do a loop on my first two steps. Im going to reflect a bit here, then continue with the rest of my second read-through and jot down the rest.
Hmm. If both of these were exactly $10k in principle, then combining them would give me a combined interest rate of 6%the exact or "straight," average of the two interest rates. But the principles have these extra variables, x and y, and they probably dont represent the same valuethat would be too easy.
I have noticed one important thing, though: this problem is really a weighted average problem in disguise, with the x and the y representing the relative weights of the two original loans. The combined loan will depend on how much each of the original loans is weighted.
Read and Jot some more.
The first part is okay, but what is up with that weird formula for r? (I don't know what it means, so I haven't jotted it down yet.) And then that last bittheyre telling me to calculate based on a simple interest rate of 5%...for the consolidated loan.
Hey! Thats Loan Z. They actually just told us that r% = 5%. :) Nice!
And heres the even nicer thing: go back to that weird formula. Plug in r = 5.
[pmath]r={4x+8y}/{x+y}[/pmath]
[pmath]5={4x+8y}/{x+y}[/pmath]
Thats ugly. So make it less ugly. Simplify!
[pmath]5(x+y)=4x+8y[/pmath]
[pmath]5x+5y=4x+8y[/pmath]
[pmath]x=3y[/pmath]
Thats certainly a much nicer equation. But whats the significance? What is that telling us?
The question asks us to find a value for x and a value for y that correspond with all of the given information. This equation gives a relationship between those two variables. Whatever y is, multiply it by 3 to get x.
Go take a look at the possible answer choices. If y were 21, what would x have to be?
If y = 21, then x = (3)21 = 63. However, that value, 63, isnt in the answers, so y doesnt equal 21.
Try the next one. If y = 32, then x = (3)32 = 96. Bingo! That value is in the answers! The value for y is 32 and the value for x is 96. Done!
Now, wait a sec. What just happened here? How did that really work?
If youre comfortable with the idea that the problem asked you for relative values of x and y, and all you really had to do was find that relative relationship and then find the two answers that fit that relationship, youre good to go.
If, on the other hand, you want to understand the underlying principles hereand, by the way, if you're interested in learning an even faster way to solvethen read on.
Remember, at the beginning, when I mentioned that this was a weighted average problem? We never followed up on that. Now were going to.
Loan X is 4% and Loan Y is 8%. And then they tell us the rate for the combined loan: its 5%. Thats really key!
If the combined loan rate is 5%, then we can figure out the relative proportion of Loan X to Loan Y using the teeter-totter method (we discuss this in the Weighted Averages chapter of our Word Problems Strategy Guide). And remember that Loan X = 10,000x and Loan Y = 10,000y. In other words, the relative values of x and y equal the relative weighting that each loan is given in the overall calculation.
Heres how it works:
If the teeter totter were perfectly balanced, then the combined rate would be exactly halfway between Loan X and Loan Y, at 6%. Its not perfectly balanced, though; its tilted over towards Loan X.
That leads to our first important conclusion: Loan X is more heavily represented, so the value of x is larger than the value of y. Keep that in mind if you get stuck and have to guess later.
Next, we can actually figure out the exact proportion of x to y. Heres how:
There are two sub-distances: 5 - 4 = 1 and 8 - 5 = 3. The shorter one goes with the smaller loan, Y. The longer one goes with the larger loan, X. The values themselves represent the ratio of the two loans: x : y = 3 : 1. In other words, x is 3 times as large as Y.
Thats the same info that the earlier equation told us, and you can follow the same logic to get to the answer pairing 32 and 96. In other words, if you recognize that this is a weighted average, you can find the 3 : 1 ratio just by drawing a number line and doing some pretty basic subtraction. No algebra needed.
As I mentioned earlier, I can definitely see them using this same principle on a regular quant question. The only major difference would be that IR questions do tend to provide more information than you need to answer a question, while quant questions do not. So, in quant-question form, the question stem would be streamlined: Youd be given only what you need in order to answer the question.
Key Takeaways for Knowing the Code:
(1) Take long story problems in parts. You may need to read the whole thing first to understand the basic story, then read it a second time in order to jot down information and reflect on how to move forward.
(2) Dont skip that Reflect step! In this case, there were two important keys to notice: first, that this is a weighted average problem in disguise, and second, that r = 5.
(3) Turn any knowledge you gain into Know the Code flash cards:
* GMATPrep questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.
Recent Articles
Archive
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009