# Know the GMAT Code: Interest Rates on the GMAT:

I’m excited about the problem I have to share with you today in the latest installment of our Know the Code series. Interest rate problems can be extremely annoying on the GMAT—you might find yourself spending 4 minutes and still having to guess in the end. So your first decision is whether you even want to tackle these kinds of problems in the first place.

But there are some things you can learn that could make answering interest rate questions a lot less irritating. Try out this Integrated Reasoning (IR) Two-Part problem from the GMATPrep® free practice exams. (Note: This one is an IR question, but I could absolutely see them testing the same principle on a Quant problem.)

If you’re planning to guess on 3 questions in the IR section, then you can give yourself 3 minutes and 20 seconds to do this problem. If you’re planning to guess on 2 questions, then give yourself 3 minutes.

“*Loan X has a principal of $10,000

xand a yearly simple interest rate of 4%. Loan Y has a principal of $10,000yand a yearly simple interest rate of 8%. Loans X and Y will be consolidated to form Loan Z with a principal of $(10,000x+ 10,000y) and a yearly simple interest rate ofr%, where. In the table, select a value forxand a value forycorresponding to a yearly simple interest rate of 5% for the consolidated loan. Make only two selections, one in each column.”

Ready?

*1-second Glance.* Two-Part. Wall of words! Story—will need to translate.

*Read *and* Jot*. This one’s so complex that I needed to read it twice, and I didn’t start writing anything till the second time. Sometimes you need to do that with story problems.

There are two loans with some details and then a third one that’s a combination of the first two. Interesting. Let’s start with the first two.

*Reflect*. I’m also going to do a loop on my first two steps. I’m going to reflect a bit here, then continue with the rest of my second read-through and jot down the rest.

Hmm. If both of these were exactly $10k in principle, then combining them would give me a combined interest rate of 6%—the exact or “straight,” average of the two interest rates. But the principles have these extra variables, *x* and *y*, and they probably don’t represent the same value—that would be too easy.

I have noticed one important thing, though: this problem is really a weighted average problem in disguise, with the *x* and the *y* representing the relative weights of the two original loans. The combined loan will depend on how much each of the original loans is weighted.

*Read* and *Jot* some more.

The first part is okay, but what is up with that weird formula for *r*? (I don’t know what it means, so I haven’t jotted it down yet.) And then that last bit—they’re telling me to calculate based on a simple interest rate of 5%…*for the consolidated loan*.

Hey! That’s Loan Z. They actually just told us that *r*% = 5%. Nice!

And here’s the even nicer thing: go back to that weird formula. Plug in *r* = 5.

That’s ugly. So make it less ugly. Simplify!

That’s certainly a much nicer equation. But what’s the significance? What is that telling us?

The question asks us to find a value for *x* and a value for *y* that correspond with all of the given information. This equation gives a relationship between those two variables. Whatever *y* is, multiply it by 3 to get *x*.

Go take a look at the possible answer choices. If *y* were 21, what would *x* have to be?

If *y* = 21, then *x* = (3)21 = 63. However, that value, 63, isn’t in the answers, so *y* doesn’t equal 21.

Try the next one. If *y* = 32, then *x* = (3)32 = 96. Bingo! That value is in the answers! The value for *y* is 32 and the value for *x* is 96. Done!

Now, wait a sec. What just happened here? How did that really work?

If you’re comfortable with the idea that the problem asked you for relative values of *x* and *y*, and all you really had to do was find that relative relationship and then find the two answers that fit that relationship, you’re good to go.

If, on the other hand, you want to understand the underlying principles here—and, by the way, if you’re interested in learning an even *faster* way to solve—then read on.

Remember, at the beginning, when I mentioned that this was a weighted average problem? We never followed up on that. Now we’re going to.

Loan X is 4% and Loan Y is 8%. And then they tell us the rate for the combined loan: it’s 5%. That’s really key!

If the combined loan rate is 5%, then we can figure out the relative proportion of Loan X to Loan Y using the teeter-totter method (we discuss this in the Weighted Averages chapter of our Word Problems Strategy Guide). And remember that Loan X = 10,000*x* and Loan Y = 10,000*y*. In other words, the relative values of *x* and* y* equal the relative weighting that each loan is given in the overall calculation.

Here’s how it works:

If the teeter totter were perfectly balanced, then the combined rate would be exactly halfway between Loan X and Loan Y, at 6%. It’s not perfectly balanced, though; it’s tilted over towards Loan X.

That leads to our first important conclusion: Loan X is more heavily represented, so the value of *x* is larger than the value of *y*. Keep that in mind if you get stuck and have to guess later.

Next, we can actually figure out the exact proportion of *x* to *y*. Here’s how:

There are two “sub-distances”: 5 – 4 = 1 and 8 – 5 = 3. The shorter one goes with the smaller loan, Y. The longer one goes with the larger loan, X. The values themselves represent the ratio of the two loans: *x* : *y* = 3 : 1. In other words, *x* is 3 times as large as Y.

That’s the same info that the earlier equation told us, and you can follow the same logic to get to the answer pairing 32 and 96. In other words, if you recognize that this is a weighted average, you can find the 3 : 1 ratio just by drawing a number line and doing some pretty basic subtraction. No algebra needed.

As I mentioned earlier, I can definitely see them using this same principle on a regular quant question. The only major difference would be that IR questions do tend to provide more information than you need to answer a question, while quant questions do not. So, in quant-question form, the question stem would be streamlined: You’d be given only what you need in order to answer the question.

## Key Takeaways for Knowing the Code:

(1) Take long story problems in parts. You may need to read the whole thing first to understand the basic story, then read it a second time in order to jot down information and reflect on how to move forward.

(2) Don’t skip that *Reflect* step! In this case, there were two important keys to notice: first, that this is a weighted average problem in disguise, and second, that *r* = 5.

(3) Turn any knowledge you gain into Know the Code flash cards:

* GMATPrep® questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.

## 1 comment

DCML on January 31st, 2017 at 7:49 am

Amazing how you broke this exercise down into more understandable pieces, Stacey.

Thank for the flashcards examples - I love those!