-
Target Test Prep 20% Off Flash Sale is on! Code: FLASH20
Redeem
Breaking Down a GMATPrep Exponential Equations Problem
This week, were going to tackle a harder GMATPrep problem solving question from the topic of Exponential Equations (a subset of Algebra).
Lets start with the problem. Set your timer for 2 minutes. and GO!
*The temperature of a certain cup of coffee 10 minutes after it was poured was 120 degrees Fahrenheit. If the temperature F of the coffee t minutes after it was poured can be determined by the formula [pmath]F=120(2^{-at})+60[/pmath], where F is in degrees Fahrenheit and a is a constant, then the temperature of the coffee 30 minutes after it was poured was how many degrees Fahrenheit?(A) 65
(B) 75
(C) 80
(D) 85
(E) 90
The problem gives us a formula; thats probably the first thing that most people will write down. The formula contains three variables: F (for temperature), t (for time) and a (an unknown constant). The problem also gives one particular scenario for a temperature, F, at a certain time, t.
Hey, those are two of the three variables! Thats great we can just plug them in and solve for a! Then well know the constant. And then we can plug that into the main formula to solve another time for the answer.
If you were writing a math textbook, or trying to solve using official math processes, then this is exactly what youd want to do. But we dont care about that. We just care about getting to the right answer in the easiest possible way. So lets talk about the official math way first and then discuss how we could use that understanding to discover an easier way.
Also, whenever you have a problem that might include conversions (hours to minutes, for example, or Fahrenheit to Celsius), double-check everything to see whether you do have any. In this case, time is always in minutes and temperature is always in Fahrenheit, so we dont need to worry about any conversions on this problem.
So, we now have this:
[pmath]120=120(2^{-a10})+60[/pmath]
[pmath]120-60=120(2^{-a10})[/pmath]
[pmath]60/120=(2^{-a10})[/pmath]
Note that we have a negative in the exponent on the right-hand side of the equation. How do we get rid of negatives in exponents? Take the reciprocal of the base term, so
[pmath](2^{-a10})[/pmath] becomes [pmath]1/2^a10[/pmath]
Now we have:
[pmath]1/2^1=1/2^a10[/pmath]
The bases (1/2) are the same, so we can drop the bases and set the exponents equal to each other:
[pmath]1=10a[/pmath]
[pmath]a=1/10[/pmath]
Now we know the value for the constant a: 1/10 or 0.1. Our standard formula becomes:
[pmath]F=120(2^(-0.1t))+60[/pmath]
The problem asks us to find the temperature, F, when the time, t, is 30 minutes:
[pmath]F=120(2^({-0.1}*30))+60[/pmath]
[pmath]F=120(2^{-3})+60[/pmath]
[pmath]F=120(1/8)+60[/pmath]
[pmath]F=15+60[/pmath]
[pmath]F=75[/pmath]
And were done! The correct answer is B.
Which part of that did you find the most annoying? For me, and for most people, it was having to solve for a. It wasnt absolutely terrible, but Id like to avoid having to do that math if I can.
When were first reading and writing down the problem, we need to realize several things:
(1) theyve given us the standard formula with three variables
(2) theyve given us an instance in which we can use two values for two of the variables (a temperature of 120 and a time of 10 minutes) in order to solve for the third (the constant)
(3) they are not actually asking us to solve for that third variable, the constant, and
(4) they are asking us to solve for another instance, or usage, of the original formula (the temperature at a time of 30 minutes)
Remember this?
[pmath]120=120(2^{-a10})+60[/pmath]
This was our starting point for the math we did above. Before you start using that formula to solve for a, also write out the one you definitely need to solve:
[pmath]F=120(2^{-a30})+60[/pmath]
You want to solve for F. Whats the painful and unnecessary spot? That constant, a. Im not asked to find a, and yet it looks like I have to solve for a in order to get the answer. Examine the two equations. Theyre very similar. and the other numbers in the problem are not that complex maybe we can find an easier way to get what we need here. Lets isolate the annoying term, [pmath](2^{-a10})[/pmath], in our first equation, just as we did earlier:
[pmath]120-60=120(2^{-a10})[/pmath]
[pmath]60=120(2^{-a10})[/pmath]
[pmath]1/2=(2^{-a10})[/pmath]
And, now, lets not solve for a, okay? We have a specific value for that nasty term that includes the unknown a. I actually need a value for a very similar (and equally nasty) term.
How do I go from [pmath](2^{-a10})[/pmath] to [pmath](2^{-a30})[/pmath]?
I have an exponent of 10 and I want an exponent of 30. If I raise the exponent to another exponent, 3, then that 10 turns into 30! For example, if I had [pmath]x^10[/pmath], I could raise that to the power of three: [pmath](x^10)^3[/pmath]. That would give me [pmath]x^30[/pmath]. Back to our problem. Whatever I do to one side of the equation, I have to do to the other, right?
[pmath](1/2)^3=[(2^{-a10})]^3[/pmath]
[pmath]1/8=[(2^{-a30})][/pmath]
Who cares what a is? We have a value to plug in for that nasty term; thats all we care about.
[pmath]F=120(2^{-a30})+60[/pmath]
[pmath]F=120(1/8)+60[/pmath]
[pmath]F=15+60[/pmath]
[pmath]F=75[/pmath]
The last three lines are identical to our first solution method we just got to skip the painful part in the middle.
Key Takeaways for Solving Hard Equation Problems:
- You may have done the long algebra the first time and gotten the problem right confidently in 2 minutes (or faster!) but that doesnt mean that you still cant learn a more efficient way to do the problem. If something feels especially annoying, long, or problematic, there probably is a more efficient way. While studying, whenever I finish a problem, I always ask myself, What was the most annoying part of that solution? and then I try to find a way to avoid having to do that! (Note: if youre taking the test and you dont know the easier way, dont try to figure it out then. Just do it however you can.)
- When you have multiple versions of the same formula, and it looks like you have to solve for an intermediate variable in order to get the final, desired variable look again, especially if it would be annoying to find that intermediate variable.
- If you have a value for one annoying term and you want to find a value for a similar term, ask yourself what math you have to do to go from the first form of the annoying term to the second. Then apply that same conversion to the value.
* GMATPrep questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.
Recent Articles
Archive
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009