-
Target Test Prep 20% Off Flash Sale is on! Code: FLASH20
Redeem
Manhattan GMAT Challenge Problem of the Week – 29 June 2010
This is our latest Challenge Problem! As always, the problem and solution below were written by one of our fantastic instructors. Each challenge problem represents a 700+ level question. If you are up for the challenge, however, set your timer for 2 mins and go! (And don't forget to answer the Showdown for a chance to win our Strategy Guides.)
Question
If v 0, is |w| < |v|?(1) w/v < 1
(2) [pmath]w^2/v^2 < 1[/pmath]
A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question asked, and additional data are needed.
Answer
In words, we are asked whether the absolute value of w is less than the absolute value of v. We could rephrase this geometrically: is w closer to 0 on the number line than v is? However, we should also retain the original phrasing, which uses concise algebra. (By the way, the condition that v does not equal 0 is only there to prevent division by 0 in the statements.)
Statement (1): INSUFFICIENT. We should not cross-multiply this statement, since we dont know whether v is positive or negative. That is, we cannot claim that w < v results from w/v < 1, since we cant multiply both sides of an inequality by a variable and preserve the inequality sign as is, unless we know that the variable is positive.
Lets instead plug a couple of quick pairs of numbers, trying for a Yes case and a No case. (The Yes case would be one in which |w| is in fact less than |v|, and the No case would be one in which |w| is not less than |v|.) Remember to try negative numbers!
Yes case: w = 2, v = 3. 2/3 is indeed less than 1, satisfying the statement.
As for the question, we get |2| < |3|, giving us a Yes answer to the question.
No case: w = -5, v = 3. -5/3 is indeed less than 1, satisfying the statement.
But |-5| is NOT less than |3|, so we would answer the question No.
Since we have both a Yes case and a No case, this statement is insufficient.
Statement (2): SUFFICIENT. Here, we CAN cross-multiply, since [pmath]v^2[/pmath] is definitely positive. Thus, we can rephrase the statement as follows:
[pmath]w^2/v^2 < 1[/pmath]
[pmath]w^2 < v^2[/pmath]
Now, since both sides are positive (or at least not negative), we can take the positive square root of both sides. The positive square root of a square is in fact the absolute value, so we get
|w| < |v|
If you like, test numbers that satisfy [pmath]w^2 < v^2[/pmath]. In every case, you will find that |w| < |v|.
The correct answer is (B).
Special Announcement: If you want to win prizes for answering our Challenge Problems, try entering our Challenge Problem Showdown. Each week, we draw a winner from all the correct answers. The winner receives a number of our our Strategy Guides. The more people enter, the better the prize.
Recent Articles
Archive
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009