Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each \(p\) percent greater in \(1998\) than in \(1995.\) What is the value of

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 2125
Joined: 14 Oct 2017
Followed by:3 members

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each \(p\) percent greater in \(1998\) than in \(1995.\) What is the value of \(p?\)

(1) In \(1995\) Karen's salary was \(\$2,000\) greater than Jason's.
(2) In \(1998\) Karen's salary was \(\$2,440\) greater than Jason's.

Answer: C

Source: GMAT Prep

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15869
Joined: 08 Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1267 members
GMAT Score:770

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

VJesus12 wrote:
Sat Oct 16, 2021 4:51 am
Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each \(p\) percent greater in \(1998\) than in \(1995.\) What is the value of \(p?\)

(1) In \(1995\) Karen's salary was \(\$2,000\) greater than Jason's.
(2) In \(1998\) Karen's salary was \(\$2,440\) greater than Jason's.

Answer: C

Source: GMAT Prep
Target question: What is the value of p?

Given: Jason's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent greater in 1998 than in 1995.
IMPORTANT: If my 1998 salary is p percent greater than my 1995 salary, then: 1998 salary = (1 + p/100)(1995 salary)
For example, if my 1998 salary is 7 percent greater than my 1995 salary, then: 1998 salary = (1 + 7/100)(1995 salary) = 1.07(1995 salary)

Let K = Karen's salary in 1995
Let J = Jason's salary in 1995
So, (1 + p/100)K = Karen's salary in 1998
And (1 + p/100)J = Jason's salary in 1998

Statement 1: In 1995 Karen's salary was $2,000 greater than Jason's
So, we get K - J = 2000
So there's no information about p, so we can't determine the value of p
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: In 1998 Karen's salary was $2,440 greater than Jason's
We get: (1 + p/100)K - (1 + p/100)J = 2400
NOTICE that we can rewrite this as: (1 + p/100)(K - J) = 2400
Since we cannot solve this equation for p, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
From statement 1, we concluded that K - J = 2000
From statement 2, we concluded that (1 + p/100)(K - J) = 2400

Now take the second equation and replace (K - J) with 2000 to get: (1 + p/100)(2000) = 2400
At this point, we need only recognize that we COULD solve this equation for p, but we're not going to, since this would waste valuable time on the time-sensitive GMAT.
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer: C

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image