Is \(x\) a multiple of \(72?\)
(1) \(x\) is a multiple of \(16.\)
(2) \(x\) is divisible by \(18.\)
Answer: C
Source: Manhattan GMAT
Is \(x\) a multiple of \(72?\)
This topic has expert replies
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
-----ASIDE---------------------
A lot of integer property questions can be solved using prime factorization.
For questions involving divisibility, divisors, factors and multiples, we can say:
If N is a multiple of k, then k is "hiding" within the prime factorization of N
Consider these examples:
24 is a multiple of 3 because 24 = (2)(2)(2)(3)
Likewise, 70 is a multiple of 5 because 70 = (2)(5)(7)
And 112 is a multiple of 8 because 112 = (2)(2)(2)(2)(7)
And 630 is a multiple of 15 because 630 = (2)(3)(3)(5)(7)
-----ONTO THE QUESTION!---------------------
Target question: Is x a multiple of 72?
This is a good candidate for rephrasing the target question.
72 = (2)(2)(2)(3)(3)
REPHRASED target question: Are three 2's and two 3's hiding in the prime factorization of x?
Aside: the video below has tips on rephrasing the target question
Statement 1: x is a multiple of 16
16 = (2)(2)(2)(2)
So, this tells us that there are four 2's hiding in the prime factorization of x.
However, we can't be sure whether there are also two 3's hiding in the prime factorization of x.
Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: x is divisible by 18
18 = (2)(3)(3)
So, this tells us that there is one 2 and two 3's hiding in the prime factorization of x.
This means we have enough 3's, however we can't be sure whether there are also three 2's hiding in the prime factorization of x
Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statements 1 and 2 combined
Statement 1 tells us that there are three 2's hiding in the prime factorization of x
Statement 2 tells us that there are two 3's hiding in the prime factorization of x
So when we COMBINE statements, the answer to the REPHRASED target question is YES, there are three 2's and two 3's hiding in the prime factorization of x
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT
Answer: C