Is it true that x>0?
1)x^2=2x
2)x^3=3x
Is it true that x>0?
This topic has expert replies
- awesomeusername
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:27 pm
- Thanked: 23 times
- Followed by:1 members
- Jose Ferreira
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:14 pm
- Location: NYC
- Thanked: 43 times
- Followed by:9 members
- GMAT Score:800
Great question!
Statement 1:
x can equal 0 or 2 and satisfy this equation, so it must be insufficient.
(0)^2=2(0)
(2)^2=2(2)
Statement 2:
x can equal 0 or sqrt3 or -sqrt3, so it is also insufficient.
(0)^3=3(0)
(sqrt3)^3=(sqrt3)^3
Put the statements together, and we see that the only number that satisfies both equations is 0. So, the answer to the original question is "No," but you cannot confuse an answer of "No" with a lack of sufficiency.
The Answer is C
Statement 1:
x can equal 0 or 2 and satisfy this equation, so it must be insufficient.
(0)^2=2(0)
(2)^2=2(2)
Statement 2:
x can equal 0 or sqrt3 or -sqrt3, so it is also insufficient.
(0)^3=3(0)
(sqrt3)^3=(sqrt3)^3
Put the statements together, and we see that the only number that satisfies both equations is 0. So, the answer to the original question is "No," but you cannot confuse an answer of "No" with a lack of sufficiency.
The Answer is C
Last edited by Jose Ferreira on Wed May 20, 2009 10:24 am, edited 3 times in total.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1169
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 2:34 am
- Thanked: 25 times
- Followed by:1 members
Jose, could you please correct my mistake?
Thanks,
AJ
Thanks,
AJ
Jose Ferreira wrote:Great question!
Statement 1:
x can equal 0 or 2 and satisfy this equation, so it must be insufficient.
(0)^2=2(0)
(2)^2=2(2)
Statement 2:
x can equal 0 or sqrt3 or -sqrt3
(0)^3=3(0)
(sqrt3)^3=(sqrt3)^3
Put the statements together, and we see that the only number that satisfies both equations is 0. So, the answer to the original question is "No", but you cannot confuse an answer of "No" is a lack of sufficiency.
The Answer is C[/list]
- awesomeusername
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:27 pm
- Thanked: 23 times
- Followed by:1 members
Hello Jose,
Thank you for your explanation! I too gave the same explanations, but GMAC had the wrong explanation for (2), so I just wanted to make sure it wasn't me.
Thank you for your explanation! I too gave the same explanations, but GMAC had the wrong explanation for (2), so I just wanted to make sure it wasn't me.
Constant dripping hollows out a stone.
-Lucretius
-Lucretius
- awesomeusername
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:27 pm
- Thanked: 23 times
- Followed by:1 members
AJ, for (1), x can be 0 or 2. Forgetting the 0 is the tricky part.
Constant dripping hollows out a stone.
-Lucretius
-Lucretius
- dmateer25
- Community Manager
- Posts: 1049
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:15 pm
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
- Thanked: 113 times
- Followed by:27 members
- GMAT Score:710
I was just going to mention that! I took a gmatfocus test last night and had this question.awesomeusername wrote:Hello Jose,
Thank you for your explanation! I too gave the same explanations, but GMAC had the wrong explanation for (2), so I just wanted to make sure it wasn't me.
GMAC OE says that for statement 2, x is 0, 3, or -3 which is clearly wrong.
- Jose Ferreira
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:14 pm
- Location: NYC
- Thanked: 43 times
- Followed by:9 members
- GMAT Score:800
Yes, that's exactly right AJ. You always have to check for restrictions on the variable in data sufficiency. In this question, they simply ask you whether x>0. We can safely assume that x can be positive, negative, or zero. Many times, that is not the case (i.e. "X is a positive integer..."), but when there are no restrictions, you can't forget about the possibility of the variable being 0.
Last edited by Jose Ferreira on Wed May 20, 2009 10:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
- cubicle_bound_misfit
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 246
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 7:34 am
- Location: Texaco Gas Station
- Thanked: 7 times
Hi Jose,
I can not get this stmt,
x can equal 0 or sqrt3 or -sqrt3
(0)^3=3(0)
(sqrt3)^3=(sqrt3)^3
stmt 2 says
x^3 = 3x
then why we are going for a avlue like 1.732 ? is not x an integer?
I can not get this stmt,
x can equal 0 or sqrt3 or -sqrt3
(0)^3=3(0)
(sqrt3)^3=(sqrt3)^3
stmt 2 says
x^3 = 3x
then why we are going for a avlue like 1.732 ? is not x an integer?
Cubicle Bound Misfit
- Jose Ferreira
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:14 pm
- Location: NYC
- Thanked: 43 times
- Followed by:9 members
- GMAT Score:800
That's correct. The question does not specify that x is an integer. So, both sqrt3 and -sqrt3 are valid values for x given statement 2.