## integrated reasoning

##### This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 15
Joined: 28 Jun 2012

### integrated reasoning

by abcd1111 » Thu Jun 28, 2012 7:42 pm

I have chosen 4 . Please explain if i am wrong .

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 15
Joined: 28 Jun 2012

### integrated reasoning

by abcd1111 » Thu Jun 28, 2012 9:57 pm
I think actual question has not been properly uploaded . here is the actual question :

can any one pls explain !! thanks a lot for help !!

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 90
Joined: 21 Mar 2012
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:2 members
by sandeep_thaparianz » Fri Jul 06, 2012 9:27 pm
question mentions min years of exp. to become a principal

for analyst it says<3 that means min =0
for associate it says 2 but can be relaxed(last point) so min again =0
for principal it says 4+ so min =4

sum all mins and we will have 4

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: 24 May 2010
Followed by:1 members
by katy_123 » Fri Jul 13, 2012 7:14 am
4 yrs as analyst + 2 yrs of MBA
total 6
but it doesnt say full time MBA so I am not sure. what is the OA?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 423
Joined: 11 Jun 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Thanked: 86 times
Followed by:2 members
by srcc25anu » Mon Apr 08, 2013 5:20 am
I would also go with 6 (min 4 yrs exp + 2 yr MBA)

what's the OA?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 423
Joined: 11 Jun 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Thanked: 86 times
Followed by:2 members
by srcc25anu » Mon Apr 08, 2013 5:24 am
there was another similar question for the same information set provided about analyst, associate and partner:

John joined the bank as an Analyst when he was 22. One year later he asked for promotion to Associate. Is it possible that he will be promoted?

YES

[spoiler]I selected NO because 2 years is required from analyst to associate which could be relaxed if atleast 2 associates recommend the analyst strongly. No information is provided about any such reco or how much the 2 year restriction can be eased. I am really confused as to how much leeway do we have in such questions?[/spoiler]

• Page 1 of 1