If x > 0, the value of 6√x - x - 8 is greatest when x=
A. 0.1
B. √63
C. √72
D. √81
E. √121
OA=D
If x > 0, the value of 6√x - x – 8 is greatest when x
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2016 5:34 am
- Thanked: 2 times
- Followed by:4 members
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi ziyuenlau,
This question can be solved by TESTing THE ANSWERS. I'm going to offer a few hints so that you can retry this question on your own:
[spoiler]
1) It's worth noting that the the "-8" in the calculation can be ignored (since it would have the same 'math effect' on all 5 calculations)
2) Answers D and E can be rewritten as 9 and 11, respectively.
3) Graphing this out would form a parabola (we know this because the prompt states that there IS a 'greatest' value, so all of the others on both "sides" would be smaller). Thus, if you TEST an answer and then find the two adjacent answers lead to smaller totals, then you can stop working.
[/spoiler]
Final Answer: D
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
This question can be solved by TESTing THE ANSWERS. I'm going to offer a few hints so that you can retry this question on your own:
[spoiler]
1) It's worth noting that the the "-8" in the calculation can be ignored (since it would have the same 'math effect' on all 5 calculations)
2) Answers D and E can be rewritten as 9 and 11, respectively.
3) Graphing this out would form a parabola (we know this because the prompt states that there IS a 'greatest' value, so all of the others on both "sides" would be smaller). Thus, if you TEST an answer and then find the two adjacent answers lead to smaller totals, then you can stop working.
[/spoiler]
Final Answer: D
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich