If r, s, and w are positive numbers such that x = 60r + 80s and r + s = 1, is x < 70 ?
(1) r > 0.5
(2) r > s
I got this question correct by plugging-in numbers, but wanted to learn ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES to answer this.
Also what do you think the question is trying to test here ?
My approach:
Start with statement 1 -> let r = 0.6 and s must therefore be 0.4. Plug this back into 60r + 80s = 68. This answers YES to the question "is x < 70?".
Test with r=0.5 and s=0.5, we can see that x=70. So can safely say that if r>0.5 then x<70
Statement 2:
If r > s, then r must be greater than 0.5 (since r + s = 1). We can use the same logic as in statement 1 here. SUFFICIENT.
Answer D.
Thanks in advance.
II
If r, s, and w are positive numbers such that x = 60r + 80s
This topic has expert replies
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Ian Stewart
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
- Location: Montreal
- Thanked: 1090 times
- Followed by:355 members
- GMAT Score:780
The equation just represents a weighted average. If r > 0.5, the value will be closer to 60 than to 80.
Think about the equation you'd set up to solve this problem: peanuts cost $60/pound, and cashews cost $80/pound. If a mixture is r% peanuts and s% cashews, what is the cost per pound of the mixture? If you ignore the 100s we need to introduce when dealing with percentages, you should get the same equation as in the question. Clearly if the mixture is more than half peanuts, it will cost less than $70/pound. Each statement tells us that.
Think about the equation you'd set up to solve this problem: peanuts cost $60/pound, and cashews cost $80/pound. If a mixture is r% peanuts and s% cashews, what is the cost per pound of the mixture? If you ignore the 100s we need to introduce when dealing with percentages, you should get the same equation as in the question. Clearly if the mixture is more than half peanuts, it will cost less than $70/pound. Each statement tells us that.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
ianstewartgmat.com
ianstewartgmat.com
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:33 am
- Thanked: 2 times
Not sure if I am incorrect in assuming r to be 0.9 and s to be 0.1. In this case x>72. So, why is the official Answer D. Should it not be E?. Can someone explain?
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Ian Stewart
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
- Location: Montreal
- Thanked: 1090 times
- Followed by:355 members
- GMAT Score:780
You might have made a small arithmetic mistake. If r = 0.9 and s = 0.1, then:ramyaravindran wrote:Not sure if I am incorrect in assuming r to be 0.9 and s to be 0.1. In this case x>72. So, why is the official Answer D. Should it not be E?. Can someone explain?
x = 60r + 80s = 60*0.9 + 80*0.1 = 54 + 8 = 62
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:33 am
- Thanked: 2 times
- II
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 400
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 1:35 pm
- Location: London, UK
- Thanked: 19 times
- GMAT Score:680
Also note: one of the most effective ways of solving GMAT inequality problems is to focus on the EXTREME VALUES of a given inequality. This is particularly helpful when solving problems that involve multiple inequalities.
Here we can plug-in extreme values for the r and s inequalities. We know that r must be greater than 0.5 and s must be less than 0.5:
- 60 * (greater than 0.5) = greater than 30
- 80 * (less than 0.5) = less than 40
- So (greater than 30) + (less than 40) = less than 70.
Here we can plug-in extreme values for the r and s inequalities. We know that r must be greater than 0.5 and s must be less than 0.5:
- 60 * (greater than 0.5) = greater than 30
- 80 * (less than 0.5) = less than 40
- So (greater than 30) + (less than 40) = less than 70.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 9:14 am
- Location: Pune, India
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:2 members
w = 60r + 80s
w = 60r + 60s + 20s
r + s = 1
60r + 60s = 60
Hence, w = 60 + 20s.. Is w < 70 => Is 60 + 2s < 70 => 2s < 10 => Is s < 0.5 ?
Statement 1 -> r > 0.5 => s < 0.5 -> Ans to question is sufficient
Statement 2 -> r > s => Sufficient !!
w = 60r + 60s + 20s
r + s = 1
60r + 60s = 60
Hence, w = 60 + 20s.. Is w < 70 => Is 60 + 2s < 70 => 2s < 10 => Is s < 0.5 ?
Statement 1 -> r > 0.5 => s < 0.5 -> Ans to question is sufficient
Statement 2 -> r > s => Sufficient !!
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Given: r, s, and w are positive numbers such that w = 60r + 80s and r + s = 1
Target question: w < 70
STRATEGY: Always be on the lookout for opportunities to rephrase the target question. In many cases, a little work up front will make analyzing the statements much easier.
Since we're told that r + s = 1, we might recognize that we can manipulate the equation w = 60r + 80s to take advantage of this information.
We can write: w = (60r + 60s) + 20s
Then factor the first part to get: w = 60(r + s) + 20s
Substitute to get: w = 60(1) + 20s
In other words: w = 60 + 20s, which means the target question becomes: Is 60 + 20s < 70?
We can make things even easier by subtracting 60 from both sides to get: Is 20s < 10?
And we can divide both sides by 20 to get: Is s < 0.5?
REPHRASED target question Is s < 0.5?
Aside: Here’s a video with tips on rephrasing the target question: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... cy?id=1100
Statement 1: r > 0.5
We already know that r + s = 1
So, for example, if r = 0.5, then s = 0.5
Similarly, if r > 0.5, we can be certain that s < 0.5
In other words, the answer to the REPHRASED target question is YES, s is less than 0.5
Statement 1 is SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: r > s
If r + s = 1, we can subtract s from both sides to get: r = 1 - s
Now take statement 2 and replace r with 1 - s to get: 1 - s > s
From here, we can add s do both sides of the inequality to get: 1 > 2s
Divide both sides by 2 to get: 0.5 > s
Once again, the answer to the REPHRASED target question is YES, s is less than 0.5
Statement 2 is SUFFICIENT
Answer: D