If mn ≠ 0, is m > n? (1) 1/m < 1/n (2) m^2 > n^2

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 157
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2016 5:34 am
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:4 members
If mn ≠ 0, is m > n?

(1) 1/m < 1/n
(2) m^2 > n^2

Source : Manhattan Prep
OA=E

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon May 22, 2017 7:48 am
Something weird occurred.
Last edited by Brent@GMATPrepNow on Mon May 22, 2017 7:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon May 22, 2017 7:49 am
hazelnut01 wrote:If mn ≠ 0, is m > n?

(1) 1/m < 1/n
(2) m² > n²
Target question: Is m > n?

Given: mn ≠ 0

Statement 1: 1/m < 1/n
This statement doesn't FEEL sufficient, so I'll TEST some values.
There are several values of m and n that satisfy statement 1. Here are two:
Case a: m = 2 and n = 1. In this case m > n
Case b: m = -3 and n = 1. In this case m < n
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Aside: For more on this idea of plugging in values when a statement doesn't feel sufficient, read my article: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/articles/dat ... lug-values

Statement 2: m² > n²
Before I start choosing numbers to test, I'll see if I can REUSE my numbers from statement 1.
Yes I can! Those same values satisfy the conditions in statement 2.
Case a: m = 2 and n = 1. In this case m > n
Case b: m = -3 and n = 1. In this case m < n
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
IMPORTANT: Notice that I was able to use the same counter-examples to show that each statement ALONE is not sufficient. So, the same counter-examples will satisfy the two statements COMBINED.
In other words,
Case a: m = 2 and n = 1. In this case m > n
Case b: m = -3 and n = 1. In this case m < n
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: E

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 1:13 am
Thanked: 5 times

by Bullzi » Fri May 26, 2017 11:49 pm
Hello,
Is there an algebraic way of solving this question? I didn't think of testing values, started with algebra, but got stuck midway not able to reach a logical conclusion

Thanks,
Bullzi

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2663
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:25 am
Location: Boston, MA
Thanked: 1153 times
Followed by:128 members
GMAT Score:770

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Sat May 27, 2017 7:51 am
Bullzi wrote:Hello,
Is there an algebraic way of solving this question? I didn't think of testing values, started with algebra, but got stuck midway not able to reach a logical conclusion

Thanks,
Bullzi
You can do algebra with some logical reasoning mixed in.

If we're given an inequality, and we take the reciprocal of both sides, the inequality sign will flip, provided that both sides are positive or both sides are negative. If other words, if A > B, and A and B are both positive (or both negative), then 1/A < 1/B. However, one side is positive and one side is negative, the inequality sign will not flip when we take the reciprocal. (This makes sense, as the reciprocal of a negative will remain negative.)

Using that property, here's one way to evaluate statement 1.
If m and n are both positive, or both negative, then when we take the reciprocal of 1/m > 1/n, we'll get m > n, or a YES to the original question. However, if m is negative and n is positive, the reciprocal would give us m < n, or a NO. Not sufficient.

Statement 2. If we take the square root of both sides of m² > n² , we'll get |m| > |n|. All this tells us is that the distance from m to 0 is greater than the distance from n to 0. But it doesn't tell us if we're dealing with positive or negative values. If m and n are positive, yes, m will be greater. But if m is negative and n is positive, then clearly m will be not be greater.

Together: Same problem. If m is negative and n is positive, then, m < n, and we get a NO. If both are positive, then m > n and we get a YES. Not sufficient. So the answer is E.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sat May 27, 2017 9:25 am
Bullzi wrote:Hello,
Is there an algebraic way of solving this question? I didn't think of testing values, started with algebra, but got stuck midway not able to reach a logical conclusion

Thanks,
Bullzi
Question stem, rephrased:
Is m-n > 0?

Statement 1: 1/m < 1/n
1/m - 1/n < 0
(n-m)/mn < 0
(m-n)/mn > 0.
Case 1: mn>0
Here, the inequality in blue will be satisfied only if m-n>0, with the result that the answer to the question stem is YES.
Case 2: mn<0
Here, the inequality in blue will be satisfied only if m-n<0, with the result that the answer to the question stem is NO.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: m² > n²
m² - n² > 0
(m+n)(m-n) > 0.
Case 1: m+n > 0
Here, the inequality in red will be satisfied only if m-n > 0, with the result that the answer to the question stem is YES.
Case 2: m+n<0
Here, the inequality in red will be satisfied only if m-n<0, with the result that the answer to the question stem is NO.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
(m-n)/mn > 0.
(m+n)(m-n) > 0.
Case 1: mn>0 and m+n>0
Here, the two colored inequalities will be satisfied only if m-n>0, with the result that the answer to the question stem is YES.
Case 2: mn<0 and m+n<0
Here, the two colored inequalities will be satisfied only if m-n<0, with the result that the answer to the question stem is NO.
INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3