Hospital exec

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:44 am
Thanked: 9 times

Hospital exec

by avenus » Thu May 28, 2009 10:42 am
Hospital executive: At a recent conference on nonprofit management, several computer experts maintained that the most significant threat faced by large institutions such as universities and hospitals is unauthorized access to confidential data. In light of this testimony, we should make the protection of our clients’ confidentiality our highest priority.

The hospital executive’s argument is most vulnerable to which one of the following objections?

(A) The argument confuses the causes of a problem with the appropriate solutions to that problem.
(B) The argument relies on the testimony of experts whose expertise is not shown to be sufficiently broad to support their general claim.
(C) The argument assumes that a correlation between two phenomena is evidence that one is the cause of the other.
(D) The argument draws a general conclusion about a group based on data about an unrepresentative sample of that group.
(E) The argument infers that a property belonging to large institutions belongs to all institutions

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 159
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 8:41 pm
Thanked: 3 times

Re: Hospital exec

by ankit1383 » Thu May 28, 2009 4:33 pm
Was confused between A and C but will go for A

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 575
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:58 am
Location: India
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:710

by rahulg83 » Thu May 28, 2009 6:50 pm
IMO D is the appropriate choice here. Expert talk about large institutions and hospital exec draws conclusion about his hospital citing what the experts said in the conference.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 8:22 pm
Location: Indy
Thanked: 3 times

Re: Hospital exec

by amazonviper » Thu May 28, 2009 7:16 pm
avenus wrote:Hospital executive: At a recent conference on nonprofit management, several computer experts maintained that the most significant threat faced by large institutions such as universities and hospitals is unauthorized access to confidential data. In light of this testimony, we should make the protection of our clients’ confidentiality our highest priority.

The hospital executive’s argument is most vulnerable to which one of the following objections?

(A) The argument confuses the causes of a problem with the appropriate solutions to that problem.
(B) The argument relies on the testimony of experts whose expertise is not shown to be sufficiently broad to support their general claim.
(C) The argument assumes that a correlation between two phenomena is evidence that one is the cause of the other.
(D) The argument draws a general conclusion about a group based on data about an unrepresentative sample of that group.
(E) The argument infers that a property belonging to large institutions belongs to all institutions
IMO D . Please post the OA.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:43 pm
Location: India

by shalinisingh » Thu May 28, 2009 11:42 pm
m not able to decide between A and C .
definitely not D cos conference is for conference includes the data for large inst. such as unversities and hospitals

Dear avenus why dont u post OA with ur questions.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 116
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:56 am

by Musicolo » Fri May 29, 2009 1:34 am
I would go for A

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 180
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 3:46 pm
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:2 members

Re: Hospital exec

by doclkk » Fri May 29, 2009 6:50 am
avenus wrote:Hospital executive: At a recent conference on nonprofit management, several computer experts maintained that the most significant threat faced by large institutions such as universities and hospitals is unauthorized access to confidential data. In light of this testimony, we should make the protection of our clients’ confidentiality our highest priority.

The hospital executive’s argument is most vulnerable to which one of the following objections?

(A) The argument confuses the causes of a problem with the appropriate solutions to that problem.
(B) The argument relies on the testimony of experts whose expertise is not shown to be sufficiently broad to support their general claim.
(C) The argument assumes that a correlation between two phenomena is evidence that one is the cause of the other.
(D) The argument draws a general conclusion about a group based on data about an unrepresentative sample of that group.
(E) The argument infers that a property belonging to large institutions belongs to all institutions
A - Not great but leave it there
B - not true - no where stated
C - What's the cause ? Not stated
D - Not true whatsoever
E - Even if was true, doesn't matter.

Keep in mind that the only two arguments made is

1. Most significant threat = security.
2. Highest priority should be protection.

The assumption here is that since it is the most significant threat, therefore it should be the highest priority. There is a clear logic flaw there because just because something might be the greatest threat - it doesn't mean a hospital's highest priority should be to mitigate that threat.

Therefore - A.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:44 am
Thanked: 9 times

by avenus » Fri May 29, 2009 8:23 am
Hi there,

OA is B

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 4:03 am

by nicolette » Sun May 15, 2016 2:59 pm
I would go for A as well. It seems the best and safest among the rest