OG 2013 PS 91
This topic has expert replies
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
A very fast solution is to see what happens when q = 1.if q is an odd number and the median of q consecutive integers is 120, what is the largest of these integers?
a) (q-1)/2 + 120
b) q/2 + 119
c) q/2 + 120
d) (q+119)/2
e) (q+120)/2
This means that there's only one integer in the set.
So, if the median of the set is 120, then the set is {120}, which means the greatest value in the set is 120
So the correct answer choice should yield 120 when q = 1.
a) (1-1)/2 + 120 = 120 PERFECT!
b) 1/2 + 119 = some non-integer
c) 1/2 + 120 = some non-integer
d) (1+119)/2 = 60
e) (1+120)/2 = some non-integer
Since only answer choice A yield the correct output, it is the answer.
Cheers,
Brent
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Here's another approach.if q is an odd number and the median of q consecutive integers is 120, what is the largest of these integers?
a) (q-1)/2 + 120
b) q/2 + 119
c) q/2 + 120
d) (q+119)/2
e) (q+120)/2
If q is odd, then the median of the q integers will be the middle number.
So, of the q integers, the MIDDLE number is 120
Of the remaining q-1 integers (not including 120), HALF of them are greater than 120 and HALF are less than 120.
In other words, (q-1)/2 of the integers are greater than 120.
So, to find the biggest number, we'll take the median (120) and add (q-1)/2 to get ... 120 + (q-1)/2
Answer = A
Cheers,
Brent
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi zeallous,
Brent's approach (that TESTs a Value) is a great way to answer this question; it's exactly how I would have approached this prompt.
This prompt is built around an interesting Number Property, which you could have used to answer the question without doing much math at all.
We're told that Q is an ODD number, we're dealing with CONSECUTIVE INTEGERS and we're asked for the LARGEST INTEGER..
Take a look at answer B. Since Q is ODD, will answer B EVER be an integer???
The answer is NO (we'd end up with a fraction, so B can't be the answer.
This same rule holds true for answer C and E. So, we've eliminated B, C and E.
Now look at D; we're taking (Q+119) and cutting it IN HALF. That math doesn't seem like it would produce the LARGEST INTEGER that we're looking for. Eliminate D.
The answer must be A. It would certainly give us an integer: (ODD - 1)/2 = INTEGER. Add THAT integer to 120 and you either get 120 or a bigger integer.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Brent's approach (that TESTs a Value) is a great way to answer this question; it's exactly how I would have approached this prompt.
This prompt is built around an interesting Number Property, which you could have used to answer the question without doing much math at all.
We're told that Q is an ODD number, we're dealing with CONSECUTIVE INTEGERS and we're asked for the LARGEST INTEGER..
Take a look at answer B. Since Q is ODD, will answer B EVER be an integer???
The answer is NO (we'd end up with a fraction, so B can't be the answer.
This same rule holds true for answer C and E. So, we've eliminated B, C and E.
Now look at D; we're taking (Q+119) and cutting it IN HALF. That math doesn't seem like it would produce the LARGEST INTEGER that we're looking for. Eliminate D.
The answer must be A. It would certainly give us an integer: (ODD - 1)/2 = INTEGER. Add THAT integer to 120 and you either get 120 or a bigger integer.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich