MCGRAW-HILL Practice Cat- How do scores compare to real GMAT

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 4:07 pm
Hello,

So I've been taking Kaplan, Princeton Review and McGraw Hill practice CAT's and my highest scores are from McGraw Hill- I started out with a 540 and now I have taken at least 3 with a score of 620.

Kaplan CAT - 510

PR - Highest was 590

GmatPrep - 570

McGraw Hill - 620

Has anyone else used McGraw Hill? I don't use the book to study but I like their CATs better because they are closer to my GMATprep scores of 570 and since they are not internet based like PR CATs I usually don't have connectivity problems while taking them. I'm curious how everyone else's scores compare since I read little about McGraw Hill on the GMAT forums..[/i]

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 56
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:23 am
Location: Perth, WA, AUSTRALIA
Thanked: 2 times

by mousymouse » Sun Apr 12, 2009 11:46 am
mcgraw is generally scores higher. try some MGMAT and see what that gives u

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 4:07 pm

by ggsol » Sun Apr 12, 2009 12:58 pm
Thanks for the suggestion!

I'm going to this week, although from what I've read on the forums the math questions on the MG are much harder than the real GMAT, so I'm looking for the practice CAT that has the material that most closely resembles that of the real GMAT.

Ive taken all the PR and Gmatprep exams so I have exhausted all the ones that seem to give me constant scores.

My test is on 4/23 and I just want to get a score over 600, I don't want to waste time practicing questions that I may not even see on the real GMAT because the difficulty level is higher than my range of questions.