GMAT LSAT CR Investigators concluded that human failure

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 145
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:18 am
Location: United Kingdom
Thanked: 5 times
Investigators concluded that human failure was not responsible for the fatal airplane crash last August, and since that time new and more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems have been in effect. That accounts for the fact that reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased in frequency by 50 percent since last August.

Which one of the following is an assumption underlying the argument in the passage?

(A) Airplane travel is still relatively safe, despite the increase in reported mechanical problems.

(B) Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased dramatically since last August.

(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August.

(D) Airlines are less reluctant to report mechanical problems than they previously were.

(E) Mechanical problems in airplanes have become easier to detect since last August.
OA after discussions
GMAT PREP 2-630
MGMAT (2):630

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 5:32 am
Thanked: 1 times

Hi

by ashaydesai » Sat Jul 18, 2009 10:03 am
IMO D..Please post OA

Legendary Member
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pm
Thanked: 104 times
Followed by:1 members

by scoobydooby » Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:12 am
C for me

A. out of scope

B. weakens. gives an alternative cause

C. negate. leads us to B and weakens. if mechanical problems have gone up by 50%, then it weakens the conclusion that stringent rules have led to 50% increase in reports of mechanical problems.

D. out of scope

E. weakens. gives an alternative cause
Last edited by scoobydooby on Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:22 am, edited 1 time in total.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 224
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 2:44 pm
Location: Russia, Moscow
Thanked: 10 times
GMAT Score:730

by ranell » Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:21 am
(A) Airplane travel is still relatively safe, despite the increase in reported mechanical problems. – the fact that airplane is still safe is out of scope, it doesn’t explain the increased number of reports of mechanical problems

(B) Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased dramatically since last August. – according to the argument, the number of reports has increased dramatically, but not the actual mechanical problems (reports don’t mean actual mechanical problems as reports can be false)

(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August – CORRECT as the conclusion is the reports were increased by 50% which means already existing problems were reported rather than new problems.

(D) Airlines are less reluctant to report mechanical problems than they previously were. – how reluctant are airlines to report mechanical problems is not applicable to our case

(E) Mechanical problems in airplanes have become easier to detect since last August. – the fact that mechanical problems have become easier to detect is out of scope [/b]

Legendary Member
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:51 pm
Thanked: 12 times

by nervesofsteel » Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:50 pm
one more for C

If problems have not increased by 50 % then only the new laws were effective in bringing problems which were not reported earlier...

if problems have increased by 50 % then new law doesn't make sense as those problem would have been reported even in the absence of any law...

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 12:11 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by ashton_s_83 » Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:14 am
i would say (E)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:26 am

by khanshainur » Sun May 15, 2016 11:25 pm
I still feel E should be the answer