hi everyone,
This isn't an OG question but as I was reviewing my index cards a thought occurred to me and I wanted to make sure about it.
Say for instance we're asked to find the Sum of all multiples of 4 between 0 and 100.
I know one method is to find the (average) * (number of multiples between 0-100) = total sum
But is the average (0+100)/2? OR is it (4+100)/2? It's the former, correct? Since 0 is a multiple of every number?
Furthermore, the number of multiples is ((100-0)/4)+1 right? I'm getting myself a little confused as this thought never occurred to me.
sum of integers questions
This topic has expert replies
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
It's hard to answer your question because people might interpret "multiples of 4 between 0 and 100" differently.gnod wrote:hi everyone,
This isn't an OG question but as I was reviewing my index cards a thought occurred to me and I wanted to make sure about it.
Say for instance we're asked to find the Sum of all multiples of 4 between 0 and 100.
I know one method is to find the (average) * (number of multiples between 0-100) = total sum
But is the average (0+100)/2? OR is it (4+100)/2? It's the former, correct? Since 0 is a multiple of every number?
Furthermore, the number of multiples is ((100-0)/4)+1 right? I'm getting myself a little confused as this thought never occurred to me.
If you mean the sum of the multiples of 4 from 0 from 100 inclusive, then the following is true:
The NUMBER of terms = ((100-0)/4) + 1 = 26
The SUM of the terms = [(0+100)/2][26] = 1300
Cheers,
Brent
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
If you're not sure about certain sums, you can always rewrite the sum as something more familiar and easier to analyze.
Take the sum 0 + 4 + 8 + 12 + 16 + ..... + 96 + 100
We can rewrite this as 4(0 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + .... + 24 + 25)
At this point, it's easy to see that there are 26 terms altogether.
The average of the values from 0 to 25 inclusive = (0 + 25)/2 = 12.5
So, the TOTAL SUM = (4)(26)(12.5) = 1300
Cheers,
Brent
Take the sum 0 + 4 + 8 + 12 + 16 + ..... + 96 + 100
We can rewrite this as 4(0 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + .... + 24 + 25)
At this point, it's easy to see that there are 26 terms altogether.
The average of the values from 0 to 25 inclusive = (0 + 25)/2 = 12.5
So, the TOTAL SUM = (4)(26)(12.5) = 1300
Cheers,
Brent
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
A super fast way to find 0 + 4 + 8 + 12 + 16 + ..... + 96 + 100 is to add the terms in PAIRS starting from the OUTSIDE and work our way in.
We get: (0 + 100) + (4 + 96) + (8 + 192) + (12 + 188) + ....
Notice that each pair of values add to 100.
How many pairs are we adding altogether?
Well, in an earlier post, we learned that there are 26 terms altogether. So, there are 13 PAIRS to add.
Since each pair of values add to 100, the TOTAL SUM = (13)(100) = 1300
Cheers,
Brent
We get: (0 + 100) + (4 + 96) + (8 + 192) + (12 + 188) + ....
Notice that each pair of values add to 100.
How many pairs are we adding altogether?
Well, in an earlier post, we learned that there are 26 terms altogether. So, there are 13 PAIRS to add.
Since each pair of values add to 100, the TOTAL SUM = (13)(100) = 1300
Cheers,
Brent
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi gnod,
In your original post, you showed that you understand the "algebra" approach to solving that sum. You'll get the same answer in either scenario, as long as you're paying attention to the details.
For the multiples of 4 from 0 to 100, inclusive, if you include the number 0, then you have 26 terms.
The average of the smallest and the biggest is (0 + 100)/2 = 50
50(26) = 1300
For the multiples of 4 from 4 to 100, inclusive, then you DON'T have the 0, so you have 25 terms.
The average of the smallest and the biggest is (4 + 100)/2 = 52
52(25) = 1300
So, either way you think about it, you should get the correct answer. You just have to make sure that you adjust your math according to the "terms" you're adding up.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
In your original post, you showed that you understand the "algebra" approach to solving that sum. You'll get the same answer in either scenario, as long as you're paying attention to the details.
For the multiples of 4 from 0 to 100, inclusive, if you include the number 0, then you have 26 terms.
The average of the smallest and the biggest is (0 + 100)/2 = 50
50(26) = 1300
For the multiples of 4 from 4 to 100, inclusive, then you DON'T have the 0, so you have 25 terms.
The average of the smallest and the biggest is (4 + 100)/2 = 52
52(25) = 1300
So, either way you think about it, you should get the correct answer. You just have to make sure that you adjust your math according to the "terms" you're adding up.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich