Federal Authorities.

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 4:36 am

Federal Authorities.

by sumittaneja009 » Thu Nov 27, 2008 8:42 am
Federal authorities involved in the investigation have found the local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent, and are suspicious of strangers.

(A) the local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent, and are
(B) local witnesses to be difficult to locate, reticent, and are
(C) that local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent, and
(D) local witnesses are difficult to locate and reticent, and they are
(E) that local witnesses are difficult to locate and reticent, and they are



OA is C

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 4:34 am
Location: Pittsburgh
Thanked: 9 times

by Tryingmybest » Thu Nov 27, 2008 8:53 am
IMO C

"X have found that" is the right usage.
A, B , D are eliminated .

E that local witnesses are difficult to locate and reticent, and they are
they is innecessary and could refer to witnesses or authorities . So no clear referent.

C is left

Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
Thanked: 55 times
Followed by:1 members

Re: Federal Authorities.

by iamcste » Thu Nov 27, 2008 9:12 am
sumittaneja009 wrote:Federal authorities involved in the investigation have found the local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent, and are suspicious of strangers.

(A) the local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent, and are
(B) local witnesses to be difficult to locate, reticent, and are
(C) that local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent, and
(D) local witnesses are difficult to locate and reticent, and they are
(E) that local witnesses are difficult to locate and reticent, and they are



OA is C

Sentence started with a clause must be introduced by "that"

Left are C and E

In C , 3 items are parallel while E breaks them into 2 parts and changes the meaning introducing pronoun errors

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 12:04 pm

by realanoop » Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:43 am
doesnt make sense

lets see the actions in parallel for option C

difficult to locate...
difficult to reticent...
difficult to suspicious of strangers (?!?!?!)

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:42 am
Thanked: 1 times

by moadhia » Thu Feb 12, 2009 8:46 pm
realanoop wrote:doesnt make sense

lets see the actions in parallel for option C

difficult to locate...
difficult to reticent...
difficult to suspicious of strangers (?!?!?!)
precisely , I don't understand that as well... how come the three parts are parallel...

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 11:14 am

by DiverJ » Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:29 pm
Difficult to locate is one characteristic.

It's not the following: difficult to this, difficult to that, and difficult to the last thing.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 6:10 pm
Thanked: 2 times

The parallelism starts after "are"

by chintudave » Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:12 am
(C) that local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent, and

The parallel construct starts after the word "are",

that the local witnesses are .... difficult to locate
that the local witnesses are .... reticent
and that the local witnesses are .... suspicious of strangers

All three ("difficult to locate", "reticent" & "suspicious of strangers") modify local witnesses!

Dave

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:32 am
Thanked: 16 times

Re: The parallelism starts after "are"

by x2suresh » Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:17 am
chintudave wrote:(C) that local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent, and

The parallel construct starts after the word "are",

that the local witnesses are .... difficult to locate
that the local witnesses are .... reticent
and that the local witnesses are .... suspicious of strangers

All three ("difficult to locate", "reticent" & "suspicious of strangers") modify local witnesses!

Dave
Agree with you..

It should be C

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:18 pm

by hintel » Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:18 am
Sorry to ask this again, could anyone clarify this ?

How can this be a parallelism.

Difficult to locate, reticent, and suspicious of strangers

some are adjectives and some of them are with nouns ?

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 435
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:15 am
Thanked: 32 times
Followed by:1 members

by eaakbari » Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:29 am
Since parallelism is only preserved by the pronoun that, only Option C & E are viable.

And between E & C, since the 'they' in E does not have a clear antecedent, we can eliminate that too.

This leaves us with C and I understand why that is the apt choice.


But my doubt regarding C is , should it not end with an 'are'

....that local witnesses ..... suspicious of strangers.. - ?!?!?!

....that local witnesses ..... ARE suspicious of strangers.. - This makes sense

Could someone clarify?
Whether you think you can or can't, you're right.
- Henry Ford

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 7:14 pm
Location: India
Thanked: 47 times
Followed by:6 members

by The Iceman » Fri Nov 30, 2012 5:01 am
eaakbari wrote: But my doubt regarding C is , should it not end with an 'are'

....that local witnesses ..... suspicious of strangers.. - ?!?!?!

....that local witnesses ..... ARE suspicious of strangers.. - This makes sense

Could someone clarify?
No C should not end with an 'are'.

Please understand that the following items are completely parallel:
'difficult to locate', 'reticent', and 'suspicious of strangers'

So we can either use 'are' at the beginning of the first item in the list or use 'are' before each item in the list.

Try flipping the position of these items to see through what i am suggesting.

Let's say we have "that local witnesses are reticent, difficult to locate, and suspicious of strangers".

I hope you get the drift....

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2018 3:08 am

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2018 9:58 pm

Sentence correction

by Gitika_Lakhotia » Thu Oct 04, 2018 3:33 am
Federal authorities involved in the investigation have found the local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent, and are suspicious of strangers.

(A) the local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent, and are- 'Are' in the end is not required. It creates a parallelism error. Also missing 'that' in the beginning
(B) local witnesses to be difficult to locate, reticent, and are - 'Are' in the end is not required. It creates a parallelism error. also missing 'that' in the beginning
(C) that local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent, and
(D) local witnesses are difficult to locate and reticent, and they are - missing 'that' in the beginning. Also, the meaning changes because of the change when 'locate and reticent' are clubbed together as one thing. Basically, now the sentences means that the local witnesses are difficult to locate and difficult to reticent. This makes no sense.
(E) that local witnesses are difficult to locate and reticent, and they are- changes meaning as described in (D)