## percent

##### This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 659
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:12 am
Thanked: 32 times
Followed by:3 members

### percent

by Gurpinder » Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:55 pm
a stereo was marked down by 30% and sold for $84. what was the pre-sale price of the stereo? .3x=84 280 why is this wrong? "Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress." - Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher. Legendary Member Posts: 1460 Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:28 am Thanked: 135 times Followed by:7 members by selango » Sun Aug 15, 2010 9:02 pm x-0.3x=84 0.7x=84 x=120 --Anand-- Legendary Member Posts: 1255 Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:08 pm Location: St. Louis Thanked: 312 times Followed by:90 members by Tani » Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:14 pm If you are unsure of a percent problem, try working backward from your answer. If the stereo started at$280 and was marked down by 30%, that would be a reduction of $84 leaving a price of$196, not $84. I suspect you misread the problem. The stereo was marked down BY 30%, not TO 30%. Tani Wolff Legendary Member Posts: 659 Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:12 am Thanked: 32 times Followed by:3 members by Gurpinder » Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:04 pm Tani Wolff - Kaplan wrote:If you are unsure of a percent problem, try working backward from your answer. If the stereo started at$280 and was marked down by 30%, that would be a reduction of $84 leaving a price of$196, not $84. I suspect you misread the problem. The stereo was marked down BY 30%, not TO 30%. So Tani,$84 is the price after the 30% reduction right??
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:08 pm
Location: St. Louis
Thanked: 312 times
Followed by:90 members
by Tani » Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:28 pm
Correct
Tani Wolff

Legendary Member
Posts: 659
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:12 am
Thanked: 32 times
Followed by:3 members
by Gurpinder » Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:41 pm
Tani Wolff - Kaplan wrote:Correct

AHHHH I see what I was doing wrong. I took $84 to be 30% whereas 84$ is the 70% of the original price

so the equation would be .7x=84 > x=120

"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:08 pm
Location: St. Louis
Thanked: 312 times
Followed by:90 members
by Tani » Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:02 pm
Exactly!
Tani Wolff

### GMAT/MBA Expert

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 6800
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2015 10:56 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanked: 43 times
Followed by:29 members

### Re: percent

by [email protected] » Mon Mar 09, 2020 3:45 am
Gurpinder wrote:
Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:55 pm
a stereo was marked down by 30% and sold for \$84. what was the pre-sale price of the stereo?

.3x=84
280

why is this wrong?
Letting n = the presale price of the stereo, we can create the following equation:

0.7n = 84

n = 120

Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO
[email protected]

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2020 9:03 pm

### Re: percent

by Ignite » Sat Aug 01, 2020 9:30 pm
The stereo was marked down by 30%.

Let its original price be X.
So, 100% = X

If it's down by 30% then 70% of it is remaining.
So 70% of X is the price it got sold for.

Thus, 0.7X = 84
Or, X = 120

Thanks,
Ignite

• Page 1 of 1