Hi there,
Could you explain the concept of this DS in simplest way
During a sale, a clothing store sold each shirt at a price of $15 and each sweater at a price of $25.
Did the store sell more sweaters than shirts during the sale?
(1) The average (arithmetic mean) of the prices of all of the shirts and sweaters that the store
sold during the sales was$21.
(2) The total price of all of the shirts and sweaters that the store sold during the sale was $420.
DS - sweaters
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 12:09 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
- GMAT Score:700
set up equation.
Q asks you whether # Sweater > # Shirts.
W--#of sweater
T--#of Sgirts
stm1.
25W + 15T = 21 (W + T) SUF
stm2.
Not Suf
Q asks you whether # Sweater > # Shirts.
W--#of sweater
T--#of Sgirts
stm1.
25W + 15T = 21 (W + T) SUF
stm2.
Not Suf
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:30 am
- Thanked: 2 times
- GMAT Score:720
I have come up with a very easy way to do questions like these.
Basically, remember this as a rule: if you have the arithmetic means for X, Y and X&Y, you can a) know which of them has a higher weight, and b) their ratio. Plot the averages on a number line.
---X----(X&Y)---------Y
Basically, if (X+Y) is closer to X, X has a greater weight.
The ratio X:Y is Y-(X&Y):X-(X&Y)
[NOTE: The values are averages]
Basically, remember this as a rule: if you have the arithmetic means for X, Y and X&Y, you can a) know which of them has a higher weight, and b) their ratio. Plot the averages on a number line.
---X----(X&Y)---------Y
Basically, if (X+Y) is closer to X, X has a greater weight.
The ratio X:Y is Y-(X&Y):X-(X&Y)
[NOTE: The values are averages]
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 7:12 am
- Location: Secaucus, New Jersey
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:700
IMO D -
Stmt 1 -
Let number of shirts be X and and number of sweaters be Y
therefore, (15x + 25y)/(x+y) = 21
=>15x + 25y = 21x + 21y
=>4y = 6x
=>x/y = 4/6
=>x/y = 2/3
from the above eqn, we can clearly determine that y is greater than x.
Stmt 1 alone is sufficient.
Stmt 2 - is satisfied for the values 15 * 8 + 25 * 12
Hence both the stmts are individually sufficient.
Stmt 1 -
Let number of shirts be X and and number of sweaters be Y
therefore, (15x + 25y)/(x+y) = 21
=>15x + 25y = 21x + 21y
=>4y = 6x
=>x/y = 4/6
=>x/y = 2/3
from the above eqn, we can clearly determine that y is greater than x.
Stmt 1 alone is sufficient.
Stmt 2 - is satisfied for the values 15 * 8 + 25 * 12
Hence both the stmts are individually sufficient.
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:23 pm
No statement 2 is not sufficient. While 8 shirts and 12 sweaters works so does 13 shirts and 9 sweaters. You can find many values for shirts that leaves a multiple of 25 for sweaters and if you look at those number half sell more sweaters half sell more shirts so 2 is inconclusive. answer is A
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 7:12 am
- Location: Secaucus, New Jersey
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:700
Agree....my bad...i inferred the stmt 2 from the result obtained from stmt 1(2:3).
I change my IMO - A
I change my IMO - A