What is the ratio of y to x?
(1) y = 3x
(2) x = 11
Can we divide the equation in (1) by x to get the ratio as 3 even if we are not explicitly given that x!=0?
The OA is A. However, I marked C since we were not given that x is !=0.
Instructor, please clear this doubt so that I don't get confused in such an easy problem again !
DS question: Instructor, can you please clear this doubt?
This topic has expert replies
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Ian Stewart
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
- Location: Montreal
- Thanked: 1090 times
- Followed by:355 members
- GMAT Score:780
If this were a real GMAT question, they would tell you in advance that x and y are positive. As you've presented the question, I suppose the right answer ought to be C, because, as you point out, x and y could be zero using statement 1 alone, in which case the ratio would be undefined. You'd never need to worry about an exception like that on a real GMAT question however.jrikhraj wrote:What is the ratio of y to x?
(1) y = 3x
(2) x = 11
Can we divide the equation in (1) by x to get the ratio as 3 even if we are not explicitly given that x!=0?
The OA is A. However, I marked C since we were not given that x is !=0.
Instructor, please clear this doubt so that I don't get confused in such an easy problem again !
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
ianstewartgmat.com
ianstewartgmat.com
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 304
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:35 am
- Location: International Space Station
- Thanked: 11 times
- Followed by:3 members
Yes , Ian has rightly pointed out that on the actual GMAT, the question will mention whether x & y are positive. And , even if we are not explicitly given x! = 0 , if we assume x!=0 , then from the first statement we get a ratio which becomes undefined. So, following Ian's logic , the answer IMOC.
800. Arjun's-Bird-Eye
Thanks Ian and Aman
This was a question from one of Manhattan's practice GMAT tests so I assumed that it would be very similar to the real GMAT. Even I was very surprised to see that x>0 was not provided. Anyway, i would take it that my reasoning is correct.
Thanks for the quick reply !!
This was a question from one of Manhattan's practice GMAT tests so I assumed that it would be very similar to the real GMAT. Even I was very surprised to see that x>0 was not provided. Anyway, i would take it that my reasoning is correct.
Thanks for the quick reply !!