Discrepancy between SC 1000 and Kaplan 800

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 8:26 am
Location: Garden Grove, CA, USA
Hi,

I cam across the following problem in Kaplan 800:

Proponents of the theory of spontaneous generation argued that simple living organisms sprang to life not through a recognizable reproductive process but came to life independently from non living matter.
a.sprang to life not through a recognizable reproductive process but came to life
b.did not spring to life through a recognizable reproductive process and came to life
c.did not spring to life through a recognizable reproductive process but came to life
d.sprang to life not through a recognizable reproductive process but
e.did not spring to life through a recognizable system of reproduction but had come to life

OA: D

It looks similar to problem 847 of 1000 SCs which is:

847. The voluminous personal papers of Thomas Alva Edison reveal that his inventions typically sprang to life not in a flash of inspiration but evolved slowly from previous works.
(A) sprang to life not in a flash of inspiration but evolved slowly
(B) sprang to life not in a flash of inspiration but were slowly evolved
(C) did not spring to life in a flash of inspiration but evolved slowly
(D) did not spring to life in a flash of inspiration but had slowly evolved
(E) did not spring to life in a flash of inspiration but they were slowly evolved

OA: C

Can someone please help me figure out which one is better?

PS: Please apologize i dont know how to put spoiler in the text while posting.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 183
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:13 pm
Location: Greater NYC
Thanked: 14 times

by prinit » Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:46 am
pankaj.chandna28 wrote:Hi,

I cam across the following problem in Kaplan 800:

Proponents of the theory of spontaneous generation argued that simple living organisms sprang to life not through a recognizable reproductive process but came to life independently from non living matter.
a.sprang to life not through a recognizable reproductive process but came to life
b.did not spring to life through a recognizable reproductive process and came to life
c.did not spring to life through a recognizable reproductive process but came to life
d.sprang to life not through a recognizable reproductive process but
e.did not spring to life through a recognizable system of reproduction but had come to life

[spoiler]OA: D[/spoiler]

It looks similar to problem 847 of 1000 SCs which is:

847. The voluminous personal papers of Thomas Alva Edison reveal that his inventions typically sprang to life not in a flash of inspiration but evolved slowly from previous works.
(A) sprang to life not in a flash of inspiration but evolved slowly
(B) sprang to life not in a flash of inspiration but were slowly evolved
(C) did not spring to life in a flash of inspiration but evolved slowly
(D) did not spring to life in a flash of inspiration but had slowly evolved
(E) did not spring to life in a flash of inspiration but they were slowly evolved

[spoiler]OA: C[/spoiler]

Can someone please help me figure out which one is better?

PS: Please apologize i dont know how to put spoiler in the text while posting.

how to put spoiler -> select the text and click on spoiler button :)
Good question ...I could not figure out a valid reason here ...we need a Kaplan expert here....
I'm here to BTG :)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 167
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 12:04 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by subgeeth » Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:34 pm
Let me try
both are testing for the same idiom Not X but Y where X !! Y


First Sprang and Came imply one and the same

Sprang to or came to life not X but Y

here X and Y are process

where X =through a recognizable reproductive process
Y=independently from non living matter

For the II
A) sprang to life not in a flash of inspiration but evolved slowly
Sprang to life not X but
X=not in a flash of inspiration
Y=evolved slowly this

They are not parallel
since Y is a verb and X does not have verb so C

I may be wrong..can any one confirm