Difficult Math Question #1

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 354
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:20 pm
Thanked: 11 times
Followed by:5 members

by 800guy » Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:08 pm
banona wrote:I am sorry alpha_gmat and 800guy

you gave the same answer as in the word document of " tough math problems" and it's wrong. n is not 79. In fact, we should check the accuracy of the answers sometimes.

I got the same answer following the same path as you (amitamit2020)
In fact, I think n= 159 ( and the trick is that people try to have something like (n+1)*n at the end, so that it would be possible to guess one n is;
now, to verify, if you plug the value of n in the the sumof even numbers you will find that :
if n = 79
2+4+6+........+78 = 2*( 1+2+3+4+........38) = 2*(39/2)*38 =38 * 39

Now, if n= 159
2+4+6+........+158 = 2( 1+2+3+4+........79) = 2*(80/2)*79 = 79*80
yup, you're right--i do provide the "OA" that's listed in the diff math questions doc. i post these questions to promote discussion on these forums...

good catch on this one

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 7:46 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by banona » Wed Feb 14, 2007 8:16 pm
That' great 800guy,
You've reached your goal making us thinking and discussing around some problems,
we are waiting for your next question

Thanks

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2469
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:09 pm
Location: BtG Underground
Thanked: 85 times
Followed by:14 members

Re: get the formula

by aim-wsc » Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:05 pm
[quote="aim-wsc''] by now one can get the TREND the pattern...
add 79 & 80.
thats it.[/quote]
so mine was correct then :mrgreen:

btw 800guy is doing great job i must tell you about this 8)
his math question series helped many of our members.

thanks 800guy :)

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:27 pm
Location: Colombia Southamerica
Thanked: 1 times

by andes1 » Thu Jul 03, 2008 9:01 pm
thanks
LEARNING ENGLIS H

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:28 am

by ttwang56 » Sun Sep 21, 2008 6:07 pm
shouldn't n = 157?

if n = 159 then the way to check would be 158+2 = 160. 160 would be able to added up all the with 4+156, etc. 160 doesn't go into the 6320 (78*80) evenly. However, if n = 157, then 2+156= 158. 158 goes evenly into 6320 with a solution of 40.

why can't u solve it by factoring 80 to being 2 x 40 and multiplying the 2 to the 79?

don't know if i explained this clearly or not.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:13 pm
Location: INDIA
GMAT Score:710

by k_abhi19 » Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:20 pm
n=159 should be the answer... I used a very simple approach.... by taking few cases...... for eg n=3........ in this case the sum of all even nos is 2.. or 1*2 .... similarly for n=5.. sum of all even nos between 1 & 5 will be 6 or 2*3 .. n=2+3=5.... for n=7... sum of all even nos in between will be 12 or 3*4 where 3+4=7=n.... thus when sum of all even nos bettwen 1 & n where n is odd... is 79*80.. then n=79+80 or 159....

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 1:27 pm

by davy420 » Tue Sep 23, 2008 1:49 pm
80 + 79 = 159

Can this problem be solved this way?

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 7:11 am
GMAT Score:590

79*80

by Xins » Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:56 am
Answer n = 159.

I did scratch my head for a few minutes.

Heres what I found

Lets take n = 3 Sum of all even number from 1-3 = 2 = 2x1
Lets take n = 5 Sum of all even number from 1-3 = 6 = 2X3
Lets take n = 7 Sum of all even number from 1-3 = 12 = 4X3

I used the X pattern since the question stem says 79*80 i.e product of 2 consequtive numbers

All the above product needs to be represented in terms on n to get their n

2X1 = [ 2 -(2-1)/2] [ 2- (2+1)/2 ]
3x2 = [ 5 -(5-1)/2] [ 5- (5+1)/2 ]
4X2 = [ 7 -(7-1)/2] [ 7- (7+1)/2 ]

Hence 80 X 79 = [n- (n-1)/2] [n -(n+1)/2]

If you solve for n ; n = 159

Hope this helps

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 7:11 am
GMAT Score:590

79*80

by Xins » Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:59 am
Pardon the typo above. It should be 4X3

4X3 = [ 7 -(7-1)/2] [ 7- (7+1)/2 ]

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 7:11 am
GMAT Score:590

79*80

by Xins » Fri Oct 31, 2008 1:27 pm
I am on a roll of typos today ......

2X1 = [ 2 -(2-1)/2] [ 2- (2+1)/2 ] should be
2X1 = [ 3 -(3-1)/2] [ 3- (3+1)/2 ]

Sorry again.......But I hope you get the point.........

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 248
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 9:51 am
Thanked: 13 times

by earth@work » Sun Nov 02, 2008 6:53 pm
nice question 800guy

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 115
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 5:31 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by piyushdabomb » Sun Nov 02, 2008 8:50 pm
What difficulty level is this sort of question? approximation of 650?
-------------------
Sincerely,

Piyush A.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:31 pm

Was Confused for a sec as well

by gmatbedamned » Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:31 pm
Love the list of tougher questions!!

I think we have a confusion of variables by the folks giving 79 as the answer.

I assume they are using the equation Sum(n terms)= n/2 * (2a + (n-1)d) where a is the first term (2) and d is the common difference (2). The equation yields "79" as the answer. Which is right, there are 79 TERMS.

The confusion stems from the fact the original question refers to n as the last term wihich is odd, NOT the number of terms. After you get the n=79 terms from the equation, to find the largest even term = #of terms * common differnece: 79*2 = 158. But n is odd and must be greater than 158 and less than 160. So n =159.

I personally like the equation Sum(X Terms) = X(First+Last)/2. The first is 2 and the last is n-1 and the number of terms (X) is (n-1)/2. It is a messier caculation but more fun!

Anyway, my two cents...

Sorry for reposting a dead topic but I was confused and I thought others would be helped by the clarification.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:14 am

by jeffm » Sat Sep 26, 2009 7:51 am
Strictly speaking the problem could be looked at as "the sum of all consecutive even integers from 2 to (n-1), inclusive".

first even number= 2
last even number = n-1

Average of all the even #s from first to last =
[(n-1)+2]*1/2 =(n+1)/2
(i.e (first + last)/2)

Total number of even integers from first to last =
1/2*[(n-1) - 2] + 1
= (n-1)/2
(i.e (last -first)/2 + 1)

Sum = (Average) * (Total number of even integers from first to last)

=>
(n+1)/2 * (n-1)/2 =79*80
=> n ~ SR(4*79*80)
n ~SR(4*80*80)
n~160

This takes a minute to do.

Well, we all know n=158.993711...

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 7:19 am

by liciniudragos » Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:50 am
After some quick search in wikipedia This is what I found:

Sum of all even numbers up to n = N(N+1) where N is the number of consecutive even numbers

So: 79*80=N(N+1) therefore N=79 the last term of the sequence

the nth number value is expressed as n(N)=a+(N-1)*d where a = 1st term here 2 and d = increment here 2

n(79)=2+(79-1)*2 so n(79)=158 so the next odd number is 159

link: https://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_s ... en_numbers

q.e.d:)