Seems, I am unable to grasp the funda of dangling modifier.
Here is what I find in MGMAT book:
The patient's rare disease was treated using novel techniques developed at the medical school. (WRONG)
Correct:
The doctor treated the patient's rare disease by using novel techniques developed at the medical school. (Correct)
OR
The patient's rare disease was treated through the use of novel techniques developed at the medical school. (Correct)
Reasoning given there: "using novel techniques..." modifier is dangling, since the sentence contains no noun that is properly modified by "using novel techniques"...
I dont get it. is "disease" not acting as noun which is modified by "using novel techniques" ?
Dangling modifier confusion: Need clarity
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:10 pm
- Thanked: 2 times
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 9:58 am
- Thanked: 3 times
The explanation is right and you are also partially correct.
If you read the explanation carefully, no noun that is properly modified.
"Using" cannot modify "disease". Does not make sense. The disease is not using the techniques.
The doctor (a noun) uses the technique, which is not there in the first sentence. In the third sentence, "using" is removed that is why there is no "doctor". "Use of X" is used instead.
If you read the explanation carefully, no noun that is properly modified.
"Using" cannot modify "disease". Does not make sense. The disease is not using the techniques.
The doctor (a noun) uses the technique, which is not there in the first sentence. In the third sentence, "using" is removed that is why there is no "doctor". "Use of X" is used instead.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:2 members
Can you please explain the same a bit more....why doctor is not needed in 3rd sentence...svishal1123 wrote:The explanation is right and you are also partially correct.
If you read the explanation carefully, no noun that is properly modified.
"Using" cannot modify "disease". Does not make sense. The disease is not using the techniques.
The doctor (a noun) uses the technique, which is not there in the first sentence. In the third sentence, "using" is removed that is why there is no "doctor". "Use of X" is used instead.
I am able to understand why doctor is required in Ist....
But why it is not required in 3rd.....i am not able to understand.....
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:10 pm
- Thanked: 2 times
me too...still not able to get it...
I have two questions:
Ques 1.
Hi svishal1123,
you said: "Using" cannot modify "disease". Does not make sense. The disease is not using the techniques.
But how come "through the use of" can fit into?
Ques 2:
The doctor treated the patient's rare disease by using novel techniques developed at the medical school. (Correct)
I am not sure why its ok to introduce "doctor" in the sentence....further, my argument might sound weird, but just for argument sake, I can say that it was not treated by doctor but by some advanced Robot machine or something....
I have two questions:
Ques 1.
Hi svishal1123,
you said: "Using" cannot modify "disease". Does not make sense. The disease is not using the techniques.
But how come "through the use of" can fit into?
Ques 2:
The doctor treated the patient's rare disease by using novel techniques developed at the medical school. (Correct)
I am not sure why its ok to introduce "doctor" in the sentence....further, my argument might sound weird, but just for argument sake, I can say that it was not treated by doctor but by some advanced Robot machine or something....
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:2 members
I agree gmattarget740....shouldn't the phrase "by using"...placed next to doctor....gmattarget700 wrote: The doctor treated the patient's rare disease by using novel techniques developed at the medical school. (Correct)
I am not sure why its ok to introduce "doctor" in the sentence....further, my argument might sound weird, but just for argument sake, I can say that it was not treated by doctor but by some advanced Robot machine or something....
IMO Manhattan says that modifier should be placed next to the noun that it modifies....
Manhattan also give one example...
Wrong: Partha is happy to go to picnic, like her friends.
Correct: Partha, like her friends, is happy to go to picnic.
Experts please comment !!!
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:10 pm
- Thanked: 2 times
I would like to hear Experts comment on the need and validity of introducing "Doctor" in the sentence....
But assuming that its valid then, placement of "by using" is fine...because placing "by using..." next to "doctor" would make the sentence not that clear as we have it this way.
Also, I am still not sure how below is correct, per MGMAT:
"The patient's rare disease was treated through the use of novel techniques developed at the medical school."
replacing "by using" with "through the use of" makes it correct sentence!!! I do not get it....
Experts please help!!
goelmohit2002,
please do not raise my bar by renaming me as "gmattarget740"....700 itself is painful....just kiddin
But assuming that its valid then, placement of "by using" is fine...because placing "by using..." next to "doctor" would make the sentence not that clear as we have it this way.
Also, I am still not sure how below is correct, per MGMAT:
"The patient's rare disease was treated through the use of novel techniques developed at the medical school."
replacing "by using" with "through the use of" makes it correct sentence!!! I do not get it....
Experts please help!!
goelmohit2002,
please do not raise my bar by renaming me as "gmattarget740"....700 itself is painful....just kiddin
- gmat740
- MBA Student
- Posts: 1194
- Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:42 pm
- Location: Paris, France
- Thanked: 71 times
- Followed by:17 members
- GMAT Score:710
Well, I am not an expert, but here is my approach:
It might be difficult at the beginning about this scope shift, but this method is really very useful(especially doing CR's)
This is hilarious
Look at the bold part. We clearly need a doctor(Subject) to treat the disease.The patient's rare disease was treated using novel techniques developed at the medical school. (WRONG)
You don't need a subject(doctor) here as the sentence shifts the scope to "the use of novel techniques".The patient's rare disease was treated through the use of novel techniques developed at the medical school. (Correct)
It might be difficult at the beginning about this scope shift, but this method is really very useful(especially doing CR's)
goelmohit2002,
please do not raise my bar by renaming me as "gmattarget740"....700 itself is painful....just kiddin
This is hilarious
can you please explain how sentence shifts the scope to" the use of novel techniques"
gmat740 wrote:Well, I am not an expert, but here is my approach:
Look at the bold part. We clearly need a doctor(Subject) to treat the disease.The patient's rare disease was treated using novel techniques developed at the medical school. (WRONG)
You don't need a subject(doctor) here as the sentence shifts the scope to "the use of novel techniques".The patient's rare disease was treated through the use of novel techniques developed at the medical school. (Correct)
It might be difficult at the beginning about this scope shift, but this method is really very useful(especially doing CR's)
goelmohit2002,
please do not raise my bar by renaming me as "gmattarget740"....700 itself is painful....just kiddin
This is hilarious
- Brian@VeritasPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1031
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:23 pm
- Location: Malibu, CA
- Thanked: 716 times
- Followed by:255 members
- GMAT Score:750
Hey guys,
Great discussion. One of my favorite things about GMAT sentence correction is that so often the explanations are more "logical" than "grammatical". In that initial explanation, let's look at the word "using". Using is either a verb or a participial modifier...most important is that "using" has a root as an action. Can "the disease" logically "use" techniques to cure itself? Not at all...that's completely illogical.
The takeaway here? If you see a modifier that uses a verb, you have to make sure that the noun being modified could possibly "do" that verb. In the first example, the disease can't "use" anything, so it's inaccurate.
Now, to correct that replacing "using" - an active verb - with "through", which is not, now we don't have that logic problem. "Through" is inactive...it's more a preposition. There's nothing logically wrong with "through" because it doesn't require the disease to actively do anything - its action ("was treated") is now over. And "the use" is offered as a noun, so it doesn't have to have a subject.
As you practice with modifiers, try to notice how often they lend themselves to discussions of just illogical or inaccurate use, and I think you'll find that they're easier to assess that way. With logic as a guide, you can reason your way through most modifier errors without needing to break down unique grammar structures all that often.
Great discussion. One of my favorite things about GMAT sentence correction is that so often the explanations are more "logical" than "grammatical". In that initial explanation, let's look at the word "using". Using is either a verb or a participial modifier...most important is that "using" has a root as an action. Can "the disease" logically "use" techniques to cure itself? Not at all...that's completely illogical.
The takeaway here? If you see a modifier that uses a verb, you have to make sure that the noun being modified could possibly "do" that verb. In the first example, the disease can't "use" anything, so it's inaccurate.
Now, to correct that replacing "using" - an active verb - with "through", which is not, now we don't have that logic problem. "Through" is inactive...it's more a preposition. There's nothing logically wrong with "through" because it doesn't require the disease to actively do anything - its action ("was treated") is now over. And "the use" is offered as a noun, so it doesn't have to have a subject.
As you practice with modifiers, try to notice how often they lend themselves to discussions of just illogical or inaccurate use, and I think you'll find that they're easier to assess that way. With logic as a guide, you can reason your way through most modifier errors without needing to break down unique grammar structures all that often.
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep
Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep
Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.