can neone explain me the following cr's..

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 1159
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:35 pm
Thanked: 56 times

can neone explain me the following cr's..

by raunekk » Wed Jun 04, 2008 10:51 am
24.Although all contemporary advertising tries to persuade, only a small portion of contemporary advertising can be considered morally reprehensible. It nevertheless follows that some attempts at persuasion can be regarded as morally reprehensible.
Which one of the following, in its logical features, most closely parallels the reasoning used in passage?

(A) None of the chemicals used for cleaning the Sistine Chapel will affect the original dyes. Hence, the colors used by Michelangelo will be fully restored.
(B) Not all operational tracking studies are conducted to illustrate exact corporate returns on investment. Hence, some of these studies are not reliable.
(C) A good manager always makes important decisions on the basis of adequate data, although of course some managers fail to do this. It follows that some managers are not good managers.
(D) There is a direct correlation between the number of times you repeat something and the degree to which you retain it. Therefore, repetition is always a critical factor in remembering.
(E) Some short poems are thematically pluralistic, since some sonnets are characterized by such pluralism, and all sonnets are short poems.


Can anyone pls give me d strategy for parallel reasonings..

thanks in advance

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 167
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:37 am
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:1 members

by pranavc » Fri Jun 06, 2008 12:45 pm
Is the answer C? If it is, let me know and I will explain the strategy.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 167
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:37 am
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:1 members

by pranavc » Fri Jun 06, 2008 12:50 pm
Sorry. I think the answer is E. If that is the case, please let me know and I will provide you with the strategy.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 5:44 am
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by loki.gmat » Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:21 am
assume following things -
persuade - X.
morally reprehensible - Y.

then the argument will look like this -
all contemporary advertising tries to X. small portion of contemporary advertising are Y. hence some advertising doing X can be considered as Y.

Option E, if read in the reverse order, resembles the above logic.


Thanks!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:44 am
Thanked: 26 times

by chidcguy » Sun Jun 08, 2008 4:42 pm
AFAIK, Parallel reasoning Q's are NOT tested on the GMAT.

Can some one confirm or deny this?

Thanks

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:22 am
chidcguy wrote:AFAIK, Parallel reasoning Q's are NOT tested on the GMAT.

Can some one confirm or deny this?

Thanks
they are vanishingly rare, but i wouldn't go so far as to say they don't exist.

if you are studying from lsat books (a very bad idea, unless you have absolutely exhausted every reputable source of gmat material), then you'll encounter this question type a lot; ergo, if you are studying from lsat books, you'll waste a lot of time.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 7:58 am

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 12:19 am
I'd say C but I'm afraid more because of my intuition than any logic.