Combatting widespread computer piracy

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:43 pm
Thanked: 1 times

Combatting widespread computer piracy

by pareekbharat86 » Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:00 am
While some propose to combat widespread illegal copying of computer programs by attempting to change people's attitudes toward pirating, others by suggesting reducing software prices to decrease the incentive for pirating, and still others by calling for the prosecution of those who copy software illegally.
(A) by suggesting reducing software prices to decrease the incentive for pirating, and still others by calling
(B) by suggesting the reduction of software prices to decrease the incentive for pirating, and still others call
(C) suggest the reduction of software prices for decreasing the incentive for pirating, and still others call
(D) suggest the reduction of software prices to decrease the incentive for pirating, and still others by calling
(E) suggest reducing software prices to decrease the incentive for pirating, and still others are calling

OA is E.

Source- GMAT Test Code 14
Thanks,
Bharat.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
Thanked: 448 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:650

by theCodeToGMAT » Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:47 am
{A} - INCORRECT; verb missing
{B} - INCORRECT; Verb Missing
{C} - INCORRECT; "suggest X to Y" idiom
{D} - INCORRECT; parallelism issue "the reduction of ... to decrease ...."
{E} - CORRECT
R A H U L

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:24 am
Thanked: 1 times

by kisna_428 » Tue Nov 05, 2013 8:55 am
Can anyone explain meaning issue between suggest x to y and suggest x for y ?
And also is parallelism is not missing in option E ?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
Thanked: 448 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:650

by theCodeToGMAT » Tue Nov 05, 2013 9:06 am
kisna_428 wrote:And also is parallelism is not missing in option E ?
(E) suggest reducing software prices to decrease the incentive for pirating, and still others are calling

X = reducing software prices
Y = decrease the incentive for pirating

Both X & Y are Simple Gerund Constructs

According to rule, simple gerunds should be parallel.
R A H U L

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
Thanked: 448 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:650

by theCodeToGMAT » Tue Nov 05, 2013 9:08 am
kisna_428 wrote:Can anyone explain meaning issue between suggest x to y and suggest x for y
It's an Idiom..

For example:

I suggested Brian to buy BMW.

We don't say: I suggested Brian for buying BMW.
R A H U L

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:24 am
Thanked: 1 times

by kisna_428 » Tue Nov 05, 2013 9:52 am
And also is parallelism is not missing in option E ?

Some propose.. Others suggest And still others calling ?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
Thanked: 448 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:650

by theCodeToGMAT » Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:04 am
kisna_428 wrote:And also is parallelism is not missing in option E ?

Some propose.. Others suggest And still others calling ?
"While some propose ..........., others suggest ........, " and still others are calling for the prosecution of those who copy software illegally.

In the above construct, the underlined parts is showing contrast.. the later italic part is merely adding more info.. don't try to make it parallel.. what we must take care is that contrast part is parallel.

For example:
While Tom studied for 3 months for GMAT, he couldn't do well, and he is now thinking for another try.
R A H U L

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Nov 05, 2013 11:18 am
kisna_428 wrote:Can anyone explain meaning issue between suggest x to y and suggest x for y ?
And also is parallelism is not missing in option E ?
Generally, to express WHY an ACTION is taken, we use a to-modifier rather than a for-modifier.
Incorrect: John drove to the store for buying milk.
Correct: John DROVE to the store TO BUY milk.
WHY did John DRIVE to the store?
TO BUY milk.

In the SC above, WHY would we be REDUCING software prices?
TO DECREASE the incentive for pirating.
The result is the construction found in the OA:
Other suggest REDUCING software prices TO DECREASE the incentive for pirating.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3