Scientists working on a number of separate projects made contributions to the invention of the radio, such as Nikola Tesla, who was one of the first to receive a patent in the United States for what was then called “wireless transmission of data.”
* radio, such as Nikola Tesla
* radio; including as Nikola Tesla
* radio, including Nikola Tesla
* radio; not least among them being Nikola Tesla
* radio; especially Nikola Tesla
(C) 2008 GMAT Club - [t]v01#37[/t]
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 829
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:09 pm
- Location: INDIA
- Thanked: 84 times
- Followed by:3 members
i think all options are wronglogitech wrote:Scientists working on a number of separate projects made contributions to the invention of the radio, such as Nikola Tesla, who was one of the first to receive a patent in the United States for what was then called “wireless transmission of data.”
* radio, such as Nikola Tesla
* radio; including as Nikola Tesla
* radio, including Nikola Tesla
* radio; not least among them being Nikola Tesla
* radio; especially Nikola Tesla
but still C looks some what better
Semi colon divides two independent clauses.
thus B,D,E do not contain an independent clause in their second part.
A and C . Use of such as is wrong in A
hence C,
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 829
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:09 pm
- Location: INDIA
- Thanked: 84 times
- Followed by:3 members
Radio such as Nicola ... nicola is not a form of radio ...logitech wrote:What is wrong with "such as" ?sudhir3127 wrote:
A and C . Use of such as is wrong in A
hence C,
- logitech
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
- Thanked: 237 times
- Followed by:25 members
- GMAT Score:730
Well so are you telling that INCLUDING Nicola does not refer to radios ?sudhir3127 wrote:Radio such as Nicola ... nicola is not a form of radio ...logitech wrote:What is wrong with "such as" ?sudhir3127 wrote:
A and C . Use of such as is wrong in A
hence C,
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 829
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:09 pm
- Location: INDIA
- Thanked: 84 times
- Followed by:3 members
As i earlier said .. all options look bad to me ..for me C is the best ..logitech wrote:Well so are you telling that INCLUDING Nicola does not refer to radios ?sudhir3127 wrote:Radio such as Nicola ... nicola is not a form of radio ...logitech wrote:What is wrong with "such as" ?sudhir3127 wrote:
A and C . Use of such as is wrong in A
hence C,
Actually it shud have been written as
scientists, including Nicola tesla,.............
but other options have bigger problems.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 940
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
- Thanked: 55 times
- Followed by:1 members
well, just to confirmlogitech wrote:Scientists working on a number of separate projects made contributions to the invention of the radio, such as Nikola Tesla, who was one of the first to receive a patent in the United States for what was then called “wireless transmission of data.”
* radio, such as Nikola Tesla
* radio; including as Nikola Tesla
* radio, including Nikola Tesla
* radio; not least among them being Nikola Tesla
* radio; especially Nikola Tesla
Is comma after Tesla present in the stem ?
I choose E
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 833
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:56 am
- Thanked: 13 times
iamcste wrote:well, just to confirmlogitech wrote:Scientists working on a number of separate projects made contributions to the invention of the radio, such as Nikola Tesla, who was one of the first to receive a patent in the United States for what was then called “wireless transmission of data.”
* radio, such as Nikola Tesla
* radio; including as Nikola Tesla
* radio, including Nikola Tesla
* radio; not least among them being Nikola Tesla
* radio; especially Nikola Tesla
Is comma after Tesla present in the stem ?
I choose E
E for me too
A - Such as is wrong.Tesla is scientist not radio.
B- Including as is wrong
C - Including tesla seems to modify radio
D - wordy
E - Two independent clauses, joined by semi colon is correct.
- karmayogi
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:19 pm
- Thanked: 27 times
- Followed by:1 members
To me all options are wrong, but in GMAT you don't have "None of these" option . So have to select something.
I was looking for something that will not modify 'radio' and E fits the bill.
IMO E
I was looking for something that will not modify 'radio' and E fits the bill.
IMO E
Each soul is potentially divine. The goal is to manifest this divine within.
--By Swami Vivekananda
--By Swami Vivekananda
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:35 pm
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:1 members
It can't be E.karmayogi wrote:To me all options are wrong, but in GMAT you don't have "None of these" option . So have to select something.
I was looking for something that will not modify 'radio' and E fits the bill.
IMO E
An independent clause must follow a semicolon. In addition, this type of clause is able to stand alone without any support:
"Especially Nikola Tesla, who was one of the first to receive a patent in the United States for what was then called “wireless transmission of data.”" This makes absolutely no sense because of the words "especially" and "who." EDIT: Actually, for this reason alone, it cannot be "B," "D" or "E."
Choice "C" makes the the info on Tesla a modifier of the original independent clause.
Last edited by brb588 on Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:07 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:13 pm
- Thanked: 33 times
- Followed by:4 members
All options look equally bad to me..
Nikola Tesla should be closer to "scientists" if u want to use 'such as' otherwise we will have a brand of radio called Nikola tesla....
E looks better than the rest but it has a long way to go.
Nikola Tesla should be closer to "scientists" if u want to use 'such as' otherwise we will have a brand of radio called Nikola tesla....
E looks better than the rest but it has a long way to go.