By pressing a tiny amount of nitrogen between two diamonds to a pressure of 25 million pounds per square inch, scientists not only were able to transform the gas into a solid, but they also created a semiconductor similar to silicon.
(A) not only were able to transform the gas into a solid, but they also created
(B) not only were able to transform the gas into a solid but also creating
(C) were able not only to transform the gas into a solid but to create
(D) were able not only to transform the gas into a solid but also creating
(E) were not only able to transform the gas into a solid, but they were also able to create
[spoiler]OA: Will be posted later. Please discuss each answer choice in detail.[/spoiler]
By pressing a tiny amount of nitrogen between two diamonds
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 759
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:15 am
- Thanked: 85 times
- Followed by:3 members
imo [spoiler]С [/spoiler]is the only answer choice that is valid here
of course it tests ||-ism: to transform...and to create
i think that you confused that idiom not only ..but also, is not complete here, but they frequently omit also. and do not consider that mistake
of course it tests ||-ism: to transform...and to create
i think that you confused that idiom not only ..but also, is not complete here, but they frequently omit also. and do not consider that mistake
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
How is idiom not only but alsoincomplete in option E????clock60 wrote:imo [spoiler]С [/spoiler]is the only answer choice that is valid here
of course it tests ||-ism: to transform...and to create
i think that you confused that idiom not only ..but also, is not complete here, but they frequently omit also. and do not consider that mistake
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:22 am
- Followed by:1 members
I also selected E at first look... but i think this option is wrong in this context because after comma and but it creates an independent clause but here it should be dependent here as it says that it not only did something but also did something else.. so it is incorrect here to make the first something independent to something else...
Hope it helps.
Let me know if my reasoning is correct
Thanks
Gautam
Hope it helps.
Let me know if my reasoning is correct
Thanks
Gautam
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 759
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:15 am
- Thanked: 85 times
- Followed by:3 members
i don`t like E for two reasons.first is meaning
were not only able to transform the gas into a solid,changes the meaning
better version:were able not only to transform....is better
and the second it the second part of the idiom breaks the ||-ism
but they were also able to create :better version will be (as i think)
but also they were able to create..., as first part of the idiom: not only...is with out verb between
were not only able to transform the gas into a solid,changes the meaning
better version:were able not only to transform....is better
and the second it the second part of the idiom breaks the ||-ism
but they were also able to create :better version will be (as i think)
but also they were able to create..., as first part of the idiom: not only...is with out verb between
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1448
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 375 times
- Followed by:53 members
Hi,clock60 wrote:i don`t like E for two reasons.first is meaning
were not only able to transform the gas into a solid,changes the meaning
better version:were able not only to transform....is better
and the second it the second part of the idiom breaks the ||-ism
but they were also able to create :better version will be (as i think)
but also they were able to create..., as first part of the idiom: not only...is with out verb between
Your first point about meaning is incorrect.
Second point: I think even then E is wrong. That usage would mean:
scientists were able to transform the gas into a solid, and
scientists were they were able to create
This usage is not parallel as well.
Correct one would be:
were not only able to transform the gas into a solid, but also able to create..
Cheers!
Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:39 am
- Thanked: 14 times
- Followed by:5 members
Dear Mitch,aspirant2011 wrote:By pressing a tiny amount of nitrogen between two diamonds to a pressure of 25 million pounds per square inch, scientists not only were able to transform the gas into a solid, but they also created a semiconductor similar to silicon.
(A) not only were able to transform the gas into a solid, but they also created
(B) not only were able to transform the gas into a solid but also creating
(C) were able not only to transform the gas into a solid but to create
(D) were able not only to transform the gas into a solid but also creating
(E) were not only able to transform the gas into a solid, but they were also able to create
[spoiler]OA: Will be posted later. Please discuss each answer choice in detail.[/spoiler]
Why does choice A wrong?
In my understating, it will be incorrect because of meaning issue. In first part (not only part), the sentence talks about ABILITY but in the second part (but part), it talks about action done. Both are not parallel.
Am I correct in my analysis?
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
not only X but Y must serve to connect PARALLEL FORMS.Mo2men wrote:Dear Mitch,
Why does choice A wrong?
A: not only were...but they
Here, were (verb) and they (pronoun) are not parallel forms.
Eliminate A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:39 am
- Thanked: 14 times
- Followed by:5 members
Thanks MitchGMATGuruNY wrote:not only X but Y must serve to connect PARALLEL FORMS.Mo2men wrote:Dear Mitch,
Why does choice A wrong?
A: not only were...but they
Here, were (verb) and they (pronoun) are not parallel forms.
Eliminate A.
But how can 'not only....but also' connect two full independent clauses.
It seems to me that it can't happen because the subject is always the same in that construction.
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
When not only...but also serves to connect two clauses, not only will generally be followed by a helping verb such as does/do/did, has/have/had, or will.Mo2men wrote:Thanks MitchGMATGuruNY wrote:not only X but Y must serve to connect PARALLEL FORMS.Mo2men wrote:Dear Mitch,
Why does choice A wrong?
A: not only were...but they
Here, were (verb) and they (pronoun) are not parallel forms.
Eliminate A.
But how can 'not only....but also' connect two full independent clauses.
It seems to me that it can't happen because the subject is always the same in that construction.
Not only did John eat the most ice cream, but he also drank the greatest amount of soda.
Not only has Mary studied algebra, but she has also learned to play the clarinet.
Not only will the two brothers make up, but they will also promise never to fight again.
In each of these sentences:
The blue portion that follows not = complete clause with subject and verb.
The red portion that follows but = complete clause with subject and verb.
Option A in the SC above:
scientists not only...but they also
Here, not is PRECEDED by a subject (scientists), while but is FOLLOWED by a subject (they).
The result is a lack of parallelism.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3