Is the number of workers required to create w1 widgets at r1

This topic has expert replies
Moderator
Posts: 7187
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
Followed by:23 members

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

Is the number of workers required to create w1 widgets at r1 widgets per minute less than the number of workers required to create w2 widgets at r2 widgets per minute?

(1) w1 is 20 less than w2.
(2) r1 is 20 less than r2.

OA E

Source: Princeton Review

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1449
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 2:16 pm
Thanked: 59 times
Followed by:33 members

by fskilnik@GMATH » Mon Nov 12, 2018 7:33 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

During a certain production time, is the number of workers required to create w1 widgets at the rate of r1 widgets per minute per worker less than the number of workers required to create w2 widgets at the rate of r2 widgets per minute per worker?

(1) w1 is 20 less than w2.
(2) r1 is 20 less than r2.
Excellent opportunity for UNITS CONTROL, one of the most powerful tools of our method!

$$N \ge 1\,\,{\mathop{\rm int}} \,\,{\rm{workers}}\,\,\,\,\,\, \to \,\,\,\,\,{w_1}\,\,{\rm{widgets}}\,\,\,\left( {{{1\,\,{\rm{minute}}} \over {N \cdot {r_1}\,\,{\rm{widgets}}}}} \right)\,\,\,\,\, = \,\,\,\,{{{w_1}\,\,} \over {N \cdot {r_1}\,\,}}\,\,\,{\rm{minutes}}$$
$$M \ge 1\,\,{\mathop{\rm int}} \,\,{\rm{workers}}\,\,\,\,\,\, \to \,\,\,\,\,{w_2}\,\,{\rm{widgets}}\,\,\,\left( {{{1\,\,{\rm{minute}}} \over {M \cdot {r_2}\,\,{\rm{widgets}}}}} \right)\,\,\,\,\, = \,\,\,\,{{{w_2}\,\,} \over {M \cdot {r_2}\,\,}}\,\,\,{\rm{minutes}}$$
$${{{w_1}\,\,} \over {N \cdot {r_1}\,\,}} = {{{w_2}\,\,} \over {M \cdot {r_2}\,\,}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\mathop \Leftrightarrow \limits^{{\rm{all}}\,\, \ne \,\,0} \,\,\,\,\,\,\,{N \over M} = {{{w_1} \cdot {r_2}} \over {{w_2} \cdot {r_1}}}$$
$$N\,\,\mathop < \limits^? \,\,M\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\mathop \Leftrightarrow \limits^{M\, > \,0} \,\,\,\,\,\,\,{N \over M}\,\,\mathop < \limits^? \,\,1\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \Leftrightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\,{{{w_1} \cdot {r_2}} \over {{w_2} \cdot {r_1}}}\,\,\mathop < \limits^? \,\,1\,\,\,$$

Let´s BIFURCATE both statement together at once, so that we are sure the correct answer is (E):

$$\left( {1 + 2} \right)\,\,\,\left\{ \matrix{
\,{w_2} = {w_1} + 20 \hfill \cr
\,\,{r_2} = {r_1} + 20 \hfill \cr} \right.\,\,\,\,\,$$
$$\left\{ \matrix{
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {{w_1},{w_2},{r_1},{r_2}} \right) = \left( {10,30,10,30} \right)\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{NO}}} \right\rangle \,\, \hfill \cr
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {{w_1},{w_2},{r_1},{r_2}} \right) = \left( {1,21,10,30} \right)\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\, \hfill \cr} \right.$$


This solution follows the notations and rationale taught in the GMATH method.

Regards,
Fabio.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br