Admissions likelihood to Ph.D. program w/3.7 MBA GPA/650GMAT

Share tips as you apply, write essays, interview...
This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 10:49 pm
GMAT Score:550
What are my chances of being accepted to an AACSB accredited Ph.D. program in marketing?

650 GMAT (goal)
3.7 MBA GPA
3.2 Undergrad GPA

Also, is there any thing i can do to increase the likelihood of being accepted?

Thanks,

Jason

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 566
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:01 am
Location: Philadelphia
Thanked: 31 times
GMAT Score:640

by AleksandrM » Sat Dec 27, 2008 3:07 pm
One of the most important parts of applying for a PhD program is the research proposal. You have to show a wide knowledge of the area you would like to study, as well as a specialized understanding of the relationships between what you want to focus on and the value of such research. Being able to explicate it, and show how your research interests would be of value to a particular school, as well as why that specific school is the best for what you would like to do, is key.

Otherwise, you will want to score in the 700 range, if you want to go to a top research university. Otherwise, a 670 to 690 will be OK.

PhD programs are certainly interested in recruiting candidates that are well rounded. However, they are far more interested in how well you understand your research proposal and what it entails. You will want to exhibit a high level of maturity - the type of maturity necessary to successfully complete 4 years of intensive study, examinations, all of which will come down to a written and an oral defense of your dissertation.

If you have had previous research experience or have published work, that's great. However, it is not a necessary part of the application, as each PhD program will provide you with at least 3 or so classes in which you will learn how to conduct research and analyze your data and results.

Hope that this helps.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 11:46 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:750

by possible_phd » Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:41 am
As a current PhD applicant who's spoken with a number of faculty, doctoral students, and recent graduates, I'm going to have to disagree with AleksandrM.
You have to show a wide knowledge of the area you would like to study, as well as a specialized understanding of the relationships between what you want to focus on and the value of such research.
That could not be more incorrect. The faculty certainly do not expect you to have a wide base of knowledge BEFORE you get your PhD, nor do they expect you to have "a specialized understanding" of the intricacies of research topics. If you had all that, why would you even need a PhD, and why in the heck would it take 4-5 years to complete?

The most important thing is NOT having a well-defined research proposal. As a matter of fact, having a research idea that is too well-defined can very well work against you. Not only do most people tend to study something completely different than they thought they would when they entered the program, but being too specific also exposes you to danger on a number of levels.

First, you run the risk of showing your ignorance. Let's be honest -- most applicants are not going to be able to have a high quality research proposal complete with methodology formulated at the time they apply. Not only are they unfamiliar with the breadth and depth of the literature, they are also not yet trained to be researchers! Coming to the plate with an idea and presenting it as certainty makes you look too cocky and unaware of your current ignorance.

Second, you run the risk of being a poor match! If there is no faculty member there who is interested in your extremely specific research proposal, nobody will want to work with you.

Your best bet is to mention specific topics that interest you and why. For example, you're interested in consumer choice models because you've always wondered how much impact SKU proliferation has on consumer purchase behavior and you like Bayesian statistics; or you're interested in the role of self-image as it relates to consumer perception of brand authenticity because of something you learned in a psychology class. Then, if you want to take a little bit of a risk, mention specific faculty at the program and their research that broadly relates to your interests.

In the end, your SOP and LORs have the biggest impact on your candidacy. GMAT/GRE scores largely serve as screening mechanisms up front and as differentiators again later in the process when choosing among short-listed candidates.

Your best bet to gain admission to a top PhD program is to score in the 720+ range, have a 3.50+ undergrad GPA and/or VERY high graduate GPA (3.8+), very strong LORs from well-known faculty, and a very well-written SOP that clearly addresses why you're interested in doing research and why you're well-suited for a career in academia.

If you, for any reason, mention that you are primarily interested in teaching or that you are interested in returning to work in industry, you will not be admitted anywhere, even if you have an 800 GMAT and a 4.0 from Harvard.

From one aspiring marketing PhD to another, best of luck!

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 566
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:01 am
Location: Philadelphia
Thanked: 31 times
GMAT Score:640

by AleksandrM » Sat Jan 03, 2009 6:33 am