Last year Torville Toys sold 34,000 Quizmo Dolls, accounting for almost half of their total revenue, twice as much as 2005.
A.twice as much as 2005
B.twice as many as 2005
C.double what it was in 2005
D.double the figure for 2005
E.twice the number that was tallied in 2005
Please explain your selections. I have some doubt about the OA, and I will post the OA after some replies. Thanks.
A Grockit Q (comparison, modifiers ...): doubt about the OA
 sam2304
 Legendary Member
 Posts: 1239
 Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 6:25 am
 Thanked: 233 times
 Followed by:26 members
 GMAT Score:680
A  as much as usage is wrong here. We are having countable nouns and many should be used
B  wrong comparison, we are comparing 34000 dolls with 2005
C  awkward, something is missing
E  too wordy though it seems fine.
IMO D.
B  wrong comparison, we are comparing 34000 dolls with 2005
C  awkward, something is missing
E  too wordy though it seems fine.
IMO D.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/

 Legendary Member
 Posts: 784
 Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:51 am
 Thanked: 114 times
 Followed by:12 members
D  IMO "figure" could refer to either 34000 dolls or revenue"thulsy wrote:Last year Torville Toys sold 34,000 Quizmo Dolls, accounting for almost half of their total revenue, twice as much as 2005.
A.twice as much as 2005
B.twice as many as 2005
C.double what it was in 2005
D.double the figure for 2005
E.twice the number that was tallied in 2005
Please explain your selections. I have some doubt about the OA, and I will post the OA after some replies. Thanks.
C  IT does not have any referent than REVENUE
IMO C
 GMAT Kolaveri
 Master  Next Rank: 500 Posts
 Posts: 287
 Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 12:33 am
 Location: Pune,India
 Thanked: 60 times
 Followed by:6 members
Dolls are countable.thulsy wrote:Last year Torville Toys sold 34,000 Quizmo Dolls, accounting for almost half of their total revenue, twice as much as 2005.
A.twice as much as 2005
B.twice as many as 2005
C.double what it was in 2005
D.double the figure for 2005
E.twice the number that was tallied in 2005
A much is incorrect
B as many as year[2005] is incorrect
C it's antecedent is not clear.
D Correct
E wordy
Regards and Thanks,
Vinoth@GMAT Kolaveri
https://www.facebook.com/GmatKolaveri
https://gmatkolaveri.tumblr.com/
Click the thank you button if you like my reply
Vinoth@GMAT Kolaveri
https://www.facebook.com/GmatKolaveri
https://gmatkolaveri.tumblr.com/
Click the thank you button if you like my reply

 Senior  Next Rank: 100 Posts
 Posts: 92
 Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 8:06 am
 Thanked: 18 times
+1 for C
patanjali.purpose wrote:D  IMO "figure" could refer to either 34000 dolls or revenue"thulsy wrote:Last year Torville Toys sold 34,000 Quizmo Dolls, accounting for almost half of their total revenue, twice as much as 2005.
A.twice as much as 2005
B.twice as many as 2005
C.double what it was in 2005
D.double the figure for 2005
E.twice the number that was tallied in 2005
Please explain your selections. I have some doubt about the OA, and I will post the OA after some replies. Thanks.
C  IT does not have any referent than REVENUE
IMO C

 Senior  Next Rank: 100 Posts
 Posts: 42
 Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:02 am
 Thanked: 9 times
 Followed by:6 members
 GMAT Score:760
Thanks all for your reply. The OA is D, and here comes the official explanation:
If a quantity is countable, then the term "as many" should be used. "As much" is used when a quantity, such as an emotion or an attribute, cannot be counted. Since the Quizmo Dolls can be counted, "as many" is the proper term in this case.
Also, "as much as 2005" is improper. It should be "as many as in 2005" or "double the figure for 2005."
Last year Torville Toys sold 34,000 Quizmo Dolls, accounting for almost half of their total revenue, twice as much as 2005.
A. twice as much as 2005Choice A is not the correct answer. Since the number of dolls can be counted, the comparison should be "as many," rather than "as much." The prepositional phrase "as 2005" is also incorrect.
B.twice as many as 2005
Choice B is not the correct answer. "As many" is correct, but the prepositional phrase "as 2005" creates an illogical comparison.
C.double what it was in 2005
Choice C is not the correct answer. This sentence is wordy and awkward
D.double the figure for 2005
Choice D is the correct answer. The emphasis is placed on the number of dolls and "for 2005" is the correct structure of the comparison.
E.twice the number that was tallied in 2005
Choice E is not the correct answer. This is too wordy and awkward.

My query:
I chose A because I was stuck with the original meaning of the sentence. There are two quantities:
1. 34000 Quizmo Dolls (this is countable)
2. half of their total revenue (the ratio  half  is uncountable)
From the original sentence (Choice A), I think the underlined part serves as an appositive noun modifier, which modifies the nearest quantity ("half"). Therefore, I construe the intended meaning as
Last year sold 34,000, accounting for almost 1/2 of their total revenue
in 2005, sold unknown #, accounting for almost 1/4 of their total revenue
Per my above understanding, "as much as" is justified, because the ratio "half" is uncountable.
For the OAD, I doubt that "the figure" is ambiguous  it could refer to either 34,000 or "half". Also, if "double the figure for 2005" is a noun modifier modifying "34,000 Quizmo Dolls", I think it should be placed as close as possible to "34,000 Quizmo Dolls".
Can anyone shed light on this? Kindly correct me if I am wrong. Thanks.
If a quantity is countable, then the term "as many" should be used. "As much" is used when a quantity, such as an emotion or an attribute, cannot be counted. Since the Quizmo Dolls can be counted, "as many" is the proper term in this case.
Also, "as much as 2005" is improper. It should be "as many as in 2005" or "double the figure for 2005."
Last year Torville Toys sold 34,000 Quizmo Dolls, accounting for almost half of their total revenue, twice as much as 2005.
A. twice as much as 2005Choice A is not the correct answer. Since the number of dolls can be counted, the comparison should be "as many," rather than "as much." The prepositional phrase "as 2005" is also incorrect.
B.twice as many as 2005
Choice B is not the correct answer. "As many" is correct, but the prepositional phrase "as 2005" creates an illogical comparison.
C.double what it was in 2005
Choice C is not the correct answer. This sentence is wordy and awkward
D.double the figure for 2005
Choice D is the correct answer. The emphasis is placed on the number of dolls and "for 2005" is the correct structure of the comparison.
E.twice the number that was tallied in 2005
Choice E is not the correct answer. This is too wordy and awkward.

My query:
I chose A because I was stuck with the original meaning of the sentence. There are two quantities:
1. 34000 Quizmo Dolls (this is countable)
2. half of their total revenue (the ratio  half  is uncountable)
From the original sentence (Choice A), I think the underlined part serves as an appositive noun modifier, which modifies the nearest quantity ("half"). Therefore, I construe the intended meaning as
Last year sold 34,000, accounting for almost 1/2 of their total revenue
in 2005, sold unknown #, accounting for almost 1/4 of their total revenue
Per my above understanding, "as much as" is justified, because the ratio "half" is uncountable.
For the OAD, I doubt that "the figure" is ambiguous  it could refer to either 34,000 or "half". Also, if "double the figure for 2005" is a noun modifier modifying "34,000 Quizmo Dolls", I think it should be placed as close as possible to "34,000 Quizmo Dolls".
Can anyone shed light on this? Kindly correct me if I am wrong. Thanks.
thulsy wrote:Last year Torville Toys sold 34,000 Quizmo Dolls, accounting for almost half of their total revenue, twice as much as 2005.
A.twice as much as 2005
B.twice as many as 2005
C.double what it was in 2005
D.double the figure for 2005
E.twice the number that was tallied in 2005
Please explain your selections. I have some doubt about the OA, and I will post the OA after some replies. Thanks.