a, b, c > 2

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

a, b, c > 2

by sanju09 » Wed Apr 22, 2009 2:20 am
If n = a^4 × b^3 × c^7, where the three distinct prime numbers a, b, c > 2; what is the number of perfect squares which are factors of n?
A. 48
B. 24
C. 18
D. 12
E. 9



OA B
Last edited by sanju09 on Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:13 pm
Thanked: 10 times

by moutar » Wed Apr 22, 2009 10:45 am
Let the perfect square be denoted: S=a^x+b^y+c^z. x y and z must all be even for S to be a perfect square.

Possible values of x are 0, 2, 4 (Total 3)
Possible values of y are 0, 2 (Total 2)
Possible values of z are 0, 2, 4, 6 (total 4)

So total possible factors = 3*2*4 = 24

I actually disagree with this answer. What is there to say that a, b and c are different? If a, b and c all equaled 3. Then n = 3^14 and would be divisible by 8 perfect squares (powers of 3: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14).

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

by sanju09 » Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:29 am
Good!!
Only one problem: Why take the perfect square as a^x + b^y + c^z?
Your objection is honoured and the question is given the necessary repair.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 229
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 6:56 am
Thanked: 8 times
GMAT Score:700

by Uri » Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:06 am
i have arrived at a solution, perhaps without thinking too much mathematically and surprisingly the answer is correct.

this problem is similar to "how many factors does a number have?" but the twist is that we have to consider taking only upto the greatest possible even degree for any prime factor and then consider that a pair of any prime factor makes 1 unit.

from a^4 we get 2 units, from b^3 we get 1 unit and from c^7 we get 3 units.

So, the solution becomes (2+1)*(1+1)*(3+1)=24

User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:42 pm
Location: Paris, France
Thanked: 71 times
Followed by:17 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmat740 » Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:53 am
from a^4 we get 2 units, from b^3 we get 1 unit and from c^7 we get 3 units.
Can you please explain

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 682
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:40 am
Thanked: 32 times
Followed by:1 members

Re: a, b, c > 2

by Vemuri » Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:51 am
The question is asking what are the number of perfect squares which are factors of n. The perfect squares are a^2, a^2, b^2, c^2, c^2, c^2. But, the list also should have combinations of these factors, such as a^2*b^2, a^2*c^2, ....etc
I am not sure I understand the question properly. Is it asking for number of distinct perfect square factors?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 180
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 3:46 pm
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:2 members

Re: a, b, c > 2

by doclkk » Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:47 am
Vemuri wrote:The question is asking what are the number of perfect squares which are factors of n. The perfect squares are a^2, a^2, b^2, c^2, c^2, c^2. But, the list also should have combinations of these factors, such as a^2*b^2, a^2*c^2, ....etc
I am not sure I understand the question properly. Is it asking for number of distinct perfect square factors?
Does this mean that if the question read

If n = a^8 × b^6 × c^14, where the three distinct prime numbers a, b, c > 2; what is the number of perfect squares which are factors of n?

5X4X8 = 160

A - 4 units
B - 3 Units
C - 7 Units

(A+1 )* (B+1) * (C+1) = 160?

If yes, thanks so much - you're great. If no, please explain your units theory - its simple and sizzling and sexy for time constraints.