##### This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: 12 Jan 2007

### 1000scn

by vcbabu » Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:42 am
In 1981 children in the United States spent an average of slightly less than two and a half hours a week doing household chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week.
A. chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week
B. chores; by 1997 that figure had grown to nearly six hours a week
C. chores, whereas nearly six hours a week were spent in 1997
D. chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours a week in 1997
E. chores, that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 26
Joined: 22 Dec 2006
by venkb » Fri Jan 19, 2007 2:46 pm
i think the answer in D. compared with is correctly used.

In A and B since the two parts are not independent and cant be separated by colons.

C is passive. That is used to introduce essential modifiers hence E is incorrect.

Any other opinions?

Legendary Member
Posts: 2469
Joined: 20 Apr 2006
Location: BtG Underground
Thanked: 85 times
Followed by:14 members
by aim-wsc » Thu Feb 08, 2007 8:41 pm
I go with D too.

but are you sure that this problem belongs to 1000 SC doc?
would you tell us the number?

### GMAT/MBA Expert

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: 27 Dec 2006
Thanked: 639 times
Followed by:693 members
GMAT Score:780
by Stacey Koprince » Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:38 pm
Choice B does not violate semi-colon rules. "by 1997 that figure had grown to nearly six hours a week" is a complete sentence (subject-verb-object!). If you want to eliminate B, you'll have to find another reason.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 14
Joined: 07 Nov 2006
Thanked: 2 times
by jatros123 » Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:34 am

Simple reason all others get eliminated..Already stacey has explained why B is not wrong..but to add to it

The sentence doesnt account for comparison.

ok let me explain..
does the sentence mean that in 1981 the children spent 2n half hours less than 6 hours they spend now..

or does the sentence try to imply that in 1981 children used to spend 2 and half hours and now they spend 6 hours..

Hope this clarifies..

Do i sound right stacey.??

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: 30 Dec 2006
by Toast » Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:12 pm
If B is correct , then can anyone explain the "tense" why "spent" used in 1981 and "had grown" in 1997, 1981 is earlier than 1997, then tense should be changed opositely? I mean had +p.p in 1981 and past in 1997?

In 1981 children in the United States spent
by 1997 that figure had grown

thanks,

Legendary Member
Posts: 559
Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:2 members
by Cybermusings » Mon Apr 02, 2007 11:52 pm
I think it is B too

• Page 1 of 1