711. The Commerce Department announced that the economy grew during the second quarter at a 7.5 percent annual rate, while inflation eased when it might have been expected for it to rise.
(A) it might have been expected for it to rise
(B) it might have been expected to rise
(C) it might have been expected that it should rise
(D) its rise might have been expected
(E) there might have been an expectation it would rise
Hi,
I though the answer was A) but the correct answer is B). Why we do not need to specify "for it = infla"?
1000 cr 711
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 7:01 pm
- Thanked: 2 times
- Followed by:1 members
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 6:20 am
- Thanked: 2 times
'IT' must always follow a noun, not an action
eg: Frank says i took his cookies, but i didn't do it --> wrong
Frank says i took his cookies, btu i didn't take them. --> right
Same mistake in posting:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/viewtopic.php?t=2395
R
eg: Frank says i took his cookies, but i didn't do it --> wrong
Frank says i took his cookies, btu i didn't take them. --> right
Same mistake in posting:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/viewtopic.php?t=2395
R
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 559
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:29 am
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:2 members
711. The Commerce Department announced that the economy grew during the second quarter at a 7.5 percent annual rate, while inflation eased when it might have been expected for it to rise.
(A) it might have been expected for it to rise
(B) it might have been expected to rise
(C) it might have been expected that it should rise
(D) its rise might have been expected
(E) there might have been an expectation it would rise
A is clearly wrong...the use of the word "it" twice makes it redundant and wordy..
C suffers from the same problem
D uses passive voice unnecessarily
Between B & E, B is crisp and precise
(A) it might have been expected for it to rise
(B) it might have been expected to rise
(C) it might have been expected that it should rise
(D) its rise might have been expected
(E) there might have been an expectation it would rise
A is clearly wrong...the use of the word "it" twice makes it redundant and wordy..
C suffers from the same problem
D uses passive voice unnecessarily
Between B & E, B is crisp and precise
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
- Thanked: 15 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:690
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2018 3:08 am
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2018 3:08 am
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2018 9:58 pm
The same pronoun used twice in a sentence needs to have the same antecedent.
In choice (A), "it might have been expected for it to rise" - the two "it" refer to different antecedents (in fact the first 'it' is used as a placeholder and has no antecedent), and hence the answer choice is incorrect.
In choice (A), "it might have been expected for it to rise" - the two "it" refer to different antecedents (in fact the first 'it' is used as a placeholder and has no antecedent), and hence the answer choice is incorrect.