| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
sulabh Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
Joined: 07 Apr 2008 Posts: 189
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 1 times in 1 posts
GMAT Score: 750
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:24 am Post subject: will vs would |
|
|
If the corporate bureaucracy persists in its discriminatory hiring and job advancement practices, its chief executives will expose themselves to class-action litigation by the groups prejudiced thereby.
A. its chief executives will expose themselves
B. its chief executives would expose themselves
C. their chief executives will expose themselves
D. its chief executives themselves would become exposed
E. the chief executives will, by themselves, be exposed
(OA is A) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
loki.gmat Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
Joined: 24 May 2008 Posts: 177
Thanks given: 1 Thanked 4 times in 4 posts
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
we require a simple future tense here.
hence eliminate B n D.
corporate bureaucracy is singular. "their" in D is incorrect.
E is passive voice n hence incorrect.
A is active voice n hence IMO A.
Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stuart Kovinsky GMAT Instructor

Joined: 08 Jan 2008 Posts: 1226
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 203 times in 185 posts
Location: Toronto GMAT Score: 800
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
We only use "would" if the sentence is written in the subjunctive voice.
In the subjunctive, we describe situations contrary to reality, we don't simply say what WILL happen in the future.
Such sentences are always in the form:
"If X were to happen, then Y would happen."
The terms can also be reversed:
"Y would happen if X were to happen."
Some examples:
If I were rich, I would buy a golden bathtub.
The U.S. would be a better place to live if it were to adopt universal health care. _________________ Stuart Kovinsky, B.A. LL.B.
Academic Co-ordinator
Kaplan Test Prep & Admissions
Toronto Office
1-800-KAP-TEST
Learn more about me |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stacey Koprince GMAT Instructor

Joined: 27 Dec 2006 Posts: 1248
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 93 times in 83 posts
Location: Bay Area, California GMAT Score: 770
|
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
A poster sent me the below PM with a link to this problem:
| Quote: | When I was going through the SC questions in the forum, I came across these two questions which tests the subjunctive. So far any subjunctive sentences, I use would and was sticking to it. These two questions has OA which has "will" instead of "would". I am not sure where these questions came from. But want to double check with you as I don't want to confuce my understanding.
Below are the links for both the questions. I would highly appreciate, if you could provide your suggestions for these questions. |
As Stuart mentioned, above, we do use the subjunctive when we are trying to talk about something that is contrary to reality or won't actually happen. We use the future tense to talk about what will actually happen (or, at least, what we believe will actually happen).
So, let's say I bought a lottery ticket yesterday, and I didn't win anything. I might say, "If I had won the lottery yesterday, I would have quit my job and moved to Tahiti."
I'm using the subjunctive because I didn't actually win the lottery; therefore, I'm not actually quitting my job and moving to Tahiti - that's contrary to reality.
Let's say I plan to buy a lottery ticket tomorrow and I don't know yet whether I will win. I might say, "If I win the lottery tomorrow, I will quit my job and move to Tahiti."
In this case, I'm telling you what I actually plan to do, for real, if I do win the lottery. So I use future tense - this time, what I'm saying is not contrary to reality. I've described what I really will do if I win.
So, on a problem like the one above, the question we have to ask ourselves is whether the sentence is talking about something contrary to reality or whether it is "predicting the future" - or saying what is actually expected to happen if something else happens first. In this case, it's the latter situation - if the bureaucracy persists in discriminating, the CEOs will, in fact, expose themselves to litigation. Make sense? _________________ Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Corporate Development, Northern California
Manhattan GMAT
Contributor to Beat The GMAT!
Learn more about me |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
"GMAT" and other GMAC™ trademarks are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council™. The Graduate Management Admission Council™ does not endorse, nor is it affiliated in any way with the owner or any content on this website. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the author or those of the members of this website. Copyright © 2008 BTG Test Prep, LLC. Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group.
|
|